I don't know quite how this connects but it was striking to me when looking at the Times university rankings list that came out last week that, which ever Scottish university you looked at, the average tariff was significantly higher than it was for the other UK universities surrounding them.
So for eg Glasgow and Ed are ranked 12 and 13 respectively, with entry requirements of 206 & 191 Ucas points. The universities immediately above and below them require 158 & 148. Its even more pronounced further down the rankings - Stirling is joint 53rd and requires 171, vs Chichester (also joint 53rd) which needs 126 and Lincoln (54th) which needs 120.
I know the rankings are flawed and that other rankings would throw up a different order - I was just so struck by the far higher entry requirements for Scottish universities than those required by other universities in a similar bracket.
Looking at it another way, if you ordered the Times list by UCAS entry points required, the list would go:
St Andrews 208
Glasgow, Cambridge 206
Strathclyde 203
Imperial, Oxford 200
Edinburgh 191
Aberdeen 185
Durham 183
LSE 182
Dundee, UCL179
I'm trying to think through whether and how this connects to this thread discussion. Does it reflect both Scottish unis being able to ask for higher grades because there is higher demand from Scottish students (ie no tuition fees) and more constraints on places because of the lower income from fees?
Interested in others thoughts.