@forfucksakenett
Okay
*@TheShadowyFeminist* I think that if you had read my posts you would know that I really do not revel in the distress of women. What a really shitty accusation.
I'm not suggesting this like it's some great idea I've had and want to try out. I'm mentioning it because, from what I can gather, since 2005 transwomen have been able to change the sex marker on their legal documents and have been accessing women only spaces as legal women.
I can't fathom you out at all - your wilful ignorance over how males being included in female wards just seems deliberately obtuse & to keep asking 'would you exclude
this male' when the entire point of female only is to exclude males irrespective of any claimed gender ID because
women need & are entitled to female only provision
especially when vulnerable in hospital.
How many more scenarios can you conjure up before it sinks in? How many more ways can you imply everyone except you is a 'transphobic bigot'? Or is the point to keep needling, as you've done in earlier threads, & put people off posting here?
It's not women's responsibility to accommodate males who feel distress because they're male & don't want to be. Doesn't matter what reason you come up with - passport being changed, you are blind to anyone's sex in any situation, they really feel like they are women, the law creates a legal fiction, they've had cosmetic surgery or taken synthetic hormones - none of these reasons change the fact when women are vulnerable, in hospital, male patients should be nowhere near women's wards & as cruel as you seem to think it is that women should be allowed to maintain their privacy & dignity especially when vulnerable & ill in hospital, your overwhelming concern for males of a variety of gender IDs does come across as revelling in women's distress.