People forget that lots of people don’t have ‘careers’ with a career path that they are keeping an eye on. Instead, they have jobs they dislike, which pay little and have no career path. Often these jobs won’t cover childcare and if you leave, you could get another anytime.
People also forget that lots of people have no financial planning but live hand-to-mouth, whether there are 2 incomes or 1 or only benefits. And huge proportions of the population don’t tend to marry anymore. There is no financial security if they break up, but for many, there is no particular financial security within the relationship either.
So much of this advice could be totally irelevant. It assumes Op is looking to ensure maximum household income and to protect a longer term future career.
I think this thread shows how much of MN is a bubble, assuming middle class values…..that maximising income rather than minimising work is the key, that marriage is the norm, and that having clear financial goals is the norm. It assumes people want a career not a job and that buying rather than renting is the goal and norm, and that £60k is okay but much more should be strived for.
Loads of people aren’t interested in work unless they need every penny to survive. Op might see the boyfriends £60k and think it means she doesn’t need to do her tedious job anymore and they will still be able to afford the rent on their place and go out. It’s about the short term, not about building up a savings pile so they can afford to buy, or about ensuring financial independence in case this relationship breaks down.
But then, Op did ask the Q, so thought us going into this.