Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Relationships

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you need help urgently or expert advice, please see our domestic violence webguide and/or relationships webguide. Many Mumsnetters experiencing domestic abuse have found this thread helpful: Listen up, everybody

Has anyone found ChatGPT too sympathetic towards an ex?

253 replies

Asq · 14/06/2026 15:49

I have started using chat GPT to go over my relationship with my ex as certain things still bother me a lot and I never had anyone to talk to about it at the time. I have started using chat GPT to write down how I felt and go over situations I felt were wrong, but it often seems to “side” with him, I don’t know if that’s the correct term but it often seems to sympathise a lot with him. Is this normal? I have even said to it a few times that I felt like it was siding with him. I don’t want to say what the things are as the great reason for chat GPT is it doesn’t judge me for things, but is this anyone else’s experience?

OP posts:
Asq · 14/06/2026 16:58

Freddiesfortune · 14/06/2026 16:56

Op I think aside from the fact a therapist would be better than this - I echo other pp above who said .. try Claude.
It’s more useful for what want to use AI for. Chat GOT is quite “HR” oriented - I’ve tested lots of discussion points around difficult subjects like sexual assault and it has reduced descriptions to “flirtation adjacent behaviour” or “boundary crossing” and then uses the sort of phrases you are seeing eg IF you are recounting honestly then you should consider calling the police.. that kind of thing.
I’ve directly asked why it does that: apparently it errs on caution if discussing a “real” person. Ask it the same question saying this is hypothetical first - you will get a different answer. Try it - open a new chat and ask your first question again specifically saying this is hypothetical.
It is not meant to be a replacement for real therapy.. for a very good reason.. but it might help you decide on strategies to cope or move on if you directly asked it.

Oh that makes sense as I think it said something similar to me when I asked why it kept siding with my ex. And yes the constant IF that did happen, IF that was said. I will try the other one I hadn’t heard of that one thanks.

OP posts:
Asq · 14/06/2026 16:59

Confuserr · 14/06/2026 16:56

Well I'm guessing you don't want to get him back given that you say he behaved very badly.

So yes, try to think about him less. I know you can't flick a switch, believe me I'm not saying it's easy, but one thing which certainly won't help you stop thinking about him is to ruminate over events which are in the past and relive them by typing them out looking for "answers".

Sounds like your human friends have been there for you but now think you need to stop going over old ground. I would take their advice over that of a robot (or indeed, strangers on mumsnet)

Quite difficult when you have children with the person which serves as a constant reminder every day.

OP posts:
sonjadog · 14/06/2026 17:00

ChatGPT is generating text based on patterns it learned from training data. You are treating like it has a brain, and is making judgement calls on what you are writing. It doesn't understand what you are writing on a human level, it is creating sentences that seem appropriate in the circumstance. So no, it isn't bias towards him, it is using patterns it has gathered as a basis to create words. If you want to be more sympathetic/ use a specific tone then tell it, and it will create text based on those preferences.

Ucloud · 14/06/2026 17:00

Asq · 14/06/2026 16:56

Won’t be giving that information I am not here to be judged and ripped apart.

Ok what is abundantly clear is that you are very unhappy. Honestly, please invest in a therapist. ChatGPT is not telling you what you want to hear so you assume that it’s being “too sympathetic”.

We are maybe telling you things you don’t want to hear like ChatGPT and again you are on the defensive and think we are wrong

Confuserr · 14/06/2026 17:04

Asq · 14/06/2026 16:59

Quite difficult when you have children with the person which serves as a constant reminder every day.

That's even more reason to work on moving forward with your life and not dwelling on old grievances until you get the "right" answer which you want to hear.

He's not just your ex who you want to hear slated by friends/robots, he's now someone you have to work on coparenting together as best you can. I don't see the benefit of going over things which upset you at the time and trying to decide "who was right". It doesn't matter, you broke up, noone has to "win" the argument now.

And please don't put private information about your children into AI, even if it's too late to stop putting your own secrets in.

Asq · 14/06/2026 17:08

I don’t want him slated. I just don’t want it to try to justify cheating and other stuff. I don’t want it to slate him.

OP posts:
Asq · 14/06/2026 17:08

It knows I have children, that doesn’t bother me.

OP posts:
Jellycatspyjamas · 14/06/2026 17:11

You’re looking for a human response from a machine. It’s not sympathetic to him, because AI doesn’t have feelings - it’s literally creating patterns based on what you tell it. It’s maybe not the tool to use if you can’t separate out an AI machine feeding you stuff from an emotion based response you might get from a person. In short, it’s not real and therefore can’t sympathise, empathise or judge, or give any other emotion based response.

sonjadog · 14/06/2026 17:14

Asq · 14/06/2026 17:08

I don’t want him slated. I just don’t want it to try to justify cheating and other stuff. I don’t want it to slate him.

Then write a prompt before you start the conversation telling it not to do this and saying what kind of responses you want it to give. You can shape the response it will give you through giving it a prompt. Your prompt can both include what you want in a response but also what you don't want. If it doesn't do what you want, then you need to work on your prompts so that it can generate the text you are looking for.

Asq · 14/06/2026 17:19

Yes I will do that.

OP posts:
Sugarnspicenallthingsnaice · 14/06/2026 17:27

Asq · 14/06/2026 17:08

I don’t want him slated. I just don’t want it to try to justify cheating and other stuff. I don’t want it to slate him.

Just to be clear here... you're talking to a machine about your feelings but you're not happy with the advice it's giving you, so you're now on the internet asking strangers for advice on how to get the machine to give you the advice you want?

Respectfully, I think it's time to snap the fuck out of this. Go outside, enjoy the sunshine, give your kids a cuddle, spend time with people you love doing things you love. Make a happy life for yourself and your children.

Asq · 14/06/2026 17:29

Sugarnspicenallthingsnaice · 14/06/2026 17:27

Just to be clear here... you're talking to a machine about your feelings but you're not happy with the advice it's giving you, so you're now on the internet asking strangers for advice on how to get the machine to give you the advice you want?

Respectfully, I think it's time to snap the fuck out of this. Go outside, enjoy the sunshine, give your kids a cuddle, spend time with people you love doing things you love. Make a happy life for yourself and your children.

It almost feels sorry for him, this man was abusive to me (won’t be going into details) if you wouldn’t be questioning why it seems to feel sorry for him then I don’t know 🤷‍♀️

OP posts:
Sugarnspicenallthingsnaice · 14/06/2026 17:32

Asq · 14/06/2026 17:29

It almost feels sorry for him, this man was abusive to me (won’t be going into details) if you wouldn’t be questioning why it seems to feel sorry for him then I don’t know 🤷‍♀️

I'm more worried about you and why you are doing this to yourself. I don't think trying to understand AI so you can manipulate the answers it gives you is in any way helpful to you.

Asq · 14/06/2026 17:38

No need to worry about me, I will tell it to be less sympathetic it’s helped a lot and I think I did myself no favours telling it to begin with

OP posts:
wetbugsthissummer · 14/06/2026 17:38

concertinacornflake · 14/06/2026 16:00

This is so unwise. ChatGPT is just a massive sentence generator, it isn't thinking, it has no understanding, it can't help you.

You would be much better off just writing in a diary and thinking this through yourself, if you can't access real therapy.

I disagree. I find it really helpful. It structures my thoughts, reframes my perspective and challenges unhelpful thinking as well as offering simple practical tips. It also remembers what I said at previous ‘sessions’ which makes it better than at least one human counsellor I have had.

It’s brilliant at helping me in crisis situations. It says all the things a good therapist would, without me fearing judgement and without crap advice and I don’t need to pay it or wait for an appointment. It’s there when I need it, in the moment.

I’ve tried a lot of therapists, some have been actively damaging. Chat gpt has been better than all but two, and only one of those two would I chose in preference to chat gpt.

I suspect it will reduce the demand on human therapists, leaving therapy for those with more complex or long term needs.

wetbugsthissummer · 14/06/2026 17:46

Asq · 14/06/2026 16:55

Thinking about it more maybe it’s my own fault, I originally told it that I liked that it was sympathetic towards him as everyone else saw him as some kind of monster so it was refreshing to hear someone actually not just paint him as the devil so maybe it’s picked up on that so has started to be even more sympathetic towards him?

It is absolutely doing that. You told it to when you said that.

Sodthesystem · 14/06/2026 17:50

No but then I only ever use it to workshop song writing and I often wonder if its blowing smoke up my arse regarding how 'brilliant' they are. I've thought about telling it it doesn't need to do that but who am i kidding, I like the praise really. Maybe you could just tell it to stop taking his side!

Asq · 14/06/2026 17:54

wetbugsthissummer · 14/06/2026 17:46

It is absolutely doing that. You told it to when you said that.

Yeah my mistake, I’ve realised since I wrote it down that I’ve obviously told it I liked it 🤦🏻‍♀️

OP posts:
ShhhhhItsASurprise · 14/06/2026 17:54

It’s a TEXT PREDICTION machine. It has zero intelligence. It doesn’t think.

concertinacornflake · 14/06/2026 17:59

wetbugsthissummer · 14/06/2026 17:38

I disagree. I find it really helpful. It structures my thoughts, reframes my perspective and challenges unhelpful thinking as well as offering simple practical tips. It also remembers what I said at previous ‘sessions’ which makes it better than at least one human counsellor I have had.

It’s brilliant at helping me in crisis situations. It says all the things a good therapist would, without me fearing judgement and without crap advice and I don’t need to pay it or wait for an appointment. It’s there when I need it, in the moment.

I’ve tried a lot of therapists, some have been actively damaging. Chat gpt has been better than all but two, and only one of those two would I chose in preference to chat gpt.

I suspect it will reduce the demand on human therapists, leaving therapy for those with more complex or long term needs.

It says all the things a good therapist would

It isn't just about the words, which are utterly meaningless from a machine. Therapy is a human-human dialogue. It's just empty drivel from a machine.

BobbieTables · 14/06/2026 18:01

AmberSpy · 14/06/2026 15:52

Gently, this is why using AI to deal with difficult subjects is a bad idea. It's not 'thinking' or 'reasoning' in response to what you're saying to it, it's essentially just a very sophisticated word-predictor. It can't respond to you in the way a human would, it doesn't have your best interests at heart, it has no intrinsic motivation to 'help' you or to take your side over your ex's.

This

BasilParsley · 14/06/2026 18:03

In my experience ChatGPT and other AI tools will ALWAYS initially give a fuzzy sort of comment somewhere in its answer about someone however nasty the person you've told it about was.

E.g. "OK, he's a serial axe murderer but he loved his children so that's good"

Simply because one quote amongst a gazillion awful ones about him chopping his victims into bits was found where one of the axe murderer's kids said "but he was such a good Dad"

Justanopinionnothingmore · 14/06/2026 18:04

Asq · 14/06/2026 15:59

See this is why I don’t talk to people, as soon as you say ex it’s shut up and don’t talk about it, well I need to process some of the stuff that happened that I’m still not over

Don't let some nobbers on here stop you posting or interacting with humans. I only tend to get frustrated if kids are being involved in their parent's stupid choices of partner and are caught up in it but we all make mistakes and at least he is an ex now so you did what was needed to be done.

Asq · 14/06/2026 18:06

Justanopinionnothingmore · 14/06/2026 18:04

Don't let some nobbers on here stop you posting or interacting with humans. I only tend to get frustrated if kids are being involved in their parent's stupid choices of partner and are caught up in it but we all make mistakes and at least he is an ex now so you did what was needed to be done.

Edited

No I definitely won’t post about it on here again people on here have been vile to me at least chat gpt doesn’t judge

OP posts:
SadiraOfTyr · 14/06/2026 18:11

As someone who works in AI, mostly for codegen and SRE use cases, I think it’s frankly insane that people are using it for the use cases described here. It’s a fancy text completion engine, nothing more. It doesn’t think, it doesn’t understand, it doesn’t have empathy. It just takes the conversation you have had so far and prints out the most likely next response based on its training data. Well, until you exceed its context window and it starts to forget earlier parts of the conversation.

Sam Altman and his ilk have really pulled a number on people haven’t they?