Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Relationships

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you need help urgently or expert advice, please see our domestic violence webguide and/or relationships webguide. Many Mumsnetters experiencing domestic abuse have found this thread helpful: Listen up, everybody

Photo posted of children without my consent

437 replies

OneCalmReader · 01/09/2025 15:32

Hi,
I recently posted about my Narcissistic MIL. She had got angry about me not posting a photograph of her hijacking my two DDs first look at my wedding. She ruined part of my day by sabotaging a first look between my DDs and she can’t seem to understand why I am upset about it and she decided to call me horrible names and say things to belittle me.
Well, yesterday she changed her profile photo on Facebook to the photo I never wanted to post. It wasn’t supposed to happen and she had access to it from a private album of our wedding photos. Where do I stand with this? I have reported it to Facebook for violating my privacy as I haven’t given her consent to post an image of myself and my children, but I haven’t heard anything back yet. I’m just not sure how to take further action.

OP posts:
VickyEadieofThigh · 01/09/2025 16:39

FloralAllTheWay · 01/09/2025 16:37

What a lovely way with words you have. No, beautiful shots of the Mother and Father enjoying their child being born rather than just the Dad taking photos on his camera phone. A professional photographer. Luckily my Dh is an incredible photographer, but many people are not.

Are you saying that some couples engage a photographer to be present whilst their child is being born?

Moveoverdarlin · 01/09/2025 16:39

Jesus Christ. Sounds like the sort of things 12 year olds fall out over.

Heronwatcher · 01/09/2025 16:40

I can not understand people who plaster images of themselves left, right and centre on every internet site possible and then go crazy when someone else puts one up. Especially when you appear to have given the person access.

I think you need to get out of your own head here- you aren’t an influencer, a brand, a celebrity or a model at work. Your MIL is a member of your family. You need to at least try to maintain a civil relationship with her and she’s not broken any laws here. If you must, ask her to change the pic, but I’d probably ignore it and wait for her to change it anyway. And stop all this first look bollocks and obsessing over Facebook, it’s a waste of time and is setting your DD a poor example.

MrsVinceVega · 01/09/2025 16:40

FloralAllTheWay · 01/09/2025 16:37

What a lovely way with words you have. No, beautiful shots of the Mother and Father enjoying their child being born rather than just the Dad taking photos on his camera phone. A professional photographer. Luckily my Dh is an incredible photographer, but many people are not.

Wtaf?

rainbowstardrops · 01/09/2025 16:41

viques · 01/09/2025 16:33

Hands up who thought a wedding was about two people declaring their love for each other and making promises and vows?

✋🏻

What a load of Instagram worthy bollocks.

PruthePrune · 01/09/2025 16:42

Why don't you just admit that you don't like your MIL instead of causing drama over a photograph?

netflixfan · 01/09/2025 16:42

Just forget the whole thing. But your husband needs to have a strong word with his mum about not putting pics of his kids on the internet for safety reasons.

LIZS · 01/09/2025 16:43

I would think there are bigger issues to fall out over than a single photo. If you allowed her access to an album it ceased to be private. Does your dh think it such a big deal?

viques · 01/09/2025 16:44

Mirabai · 01/09/2025 16:34

This sounds quite bizarre.

First look at births? How does that work? Up your vag?

I think it is an ultrasound of the woman’s ovary and Fallopian tube as the egg exits merged with a tasteful shot of the man’s perfectly groomed testicles , sort of misty and soft focus.

2chocolateoranges · 01/09/2025 16:44

Wow, Mumsnet is full of nasty people judging the OP.
Many brides have first looks, (even I did and I got married in 2000) many brides have content creators. It’s the joy of weddings now

get your dh to tell her to take the photo down now, block her on all social media and do not allow her access to any of your photos.

keep reporting it to Facebook.

roseymoira · 01/09/2025 16:45

This can’t be real

RimTimTagiDim · 01/09/2025 16:45

OneCalmReader · 01/09/2025 15:46

my eldest daughter wanted my content creator and photographer to capture a first look of me as a bride. My MIL rudely walked into the room with them, going against my wishes. So I decided I didn’t want the photos and videos posted because she went against my wishes. She can’t respect this

And you're old enough to get married?

ThesebeautifulthingsthatIvegot · 01/09/2025 16:46

ThejoyofNC · 01/09/2025 16:21

I couldn't help but try and find out what a wedding content creator charges. This one is £695 for HALF a day. Next time I see a thread of someone struggling for money I'm suggesting this, all you need is an iPhone.

www.weddingcontentcreator.co.uk/services

"Wedding photography is an art and it can take between 6-8 weeks to receive your beautiful photos. With our service, you can relive a taste of your special day within 24 hours."

AKA. what we do is not an art

Growlybear83 · 01/09/2025 16:47

FloralAllTheWay · 01/09/2025 16:37

What a lovely way with words you have. No, beautiful shots of the Mother and Father enjoying their child being born rather than just the Dad taking photos on his camera phone. A professional photographer. Luckily my Dh is an incredible photographer, but many people are not.

Are you seriously suggesting that people want photos of their children actually being born rather than a couple nice snaps once the baby has been cleaned and wrapped up? I can’t think of many more gruesome things quite honestly. The first photo that was taken of my husband holding our daughter a few minutes after she had been born is really precious but if a stranger had been in the room taking photos of her being pulled from my vag with a giant sink plunger I would have made sure he/she suffered just as much pain as I was in!

TorroFerney · 01/09/2025 16:47

FloralAllTheWay · 01/09/2025 16:27

First look has been a normal thing in US weddings for years. Usually it is the Father of the bride first in the room where the bride got ready so the Mum is there. Separately the groom also has a first look at his bride and they then have a private moment before the wedding starts and everyone sees the dress. In OP's case she has daughters and they wanted a first look.

There are some very beautiful co-ordinated photographs of things like first looks and the same when people give birth too. Judge all you want but most people only imagine getting married once. I had 2 photographers for my wedding, one for me and one for Dh to capture getting ready as well as different angles at the church.

The MIL in this case has posted images of children without their Mother's consent.

Edited

Thank you for the explanation. I’m in awe of anyone who thinks they are so lovely that they get someone in to look at them in a white frock like it’s a special thing. What are they going to say? You look shit. No they’ll plaster on a smile and ooh and aah whatever they think. How do you do it with a straight face or not with the thought at the back of your mind that they are just bulshitting you? Your husband/wife I can understand but little kids just like party frocks so they are an easy audience. You could be dressed in a Disney outfit for all they care.

I would love to have so much confidence, well it’s not confidence is it - be so self absorbed rather than self effacing.

PinkFlloyd · 01/09/2025 16:47

I read your original OP. Why on earth would you post (even privately) on FB if you didn't want your MIL to get access? In the grand scheme of things, it seems so trivial a thing to let eat you up to this extent.
Private is private, FB is not, surely you knew that and the 'first look' compared to the celrbration of a marriage, really isn't something to be this upset about. A different perspective (and counselling) might help.
I was very fortunate to see one af my adult DC marry (I have a life limiting condition). I feel beyond blessed to have lived to see such a precious day.

Letsgoroundagainnow · 01/09/2025 16:48

FloralAllTheWay · 01/09/2025 16:27

First look has been a normal thing in US weddings for years. Usually it is the Father of the bride first in the room where the bride got ready so the Mum is there. Separately the groom also has a first look at his bride and they then have a private moment before the wedding starts and everyone sees the dress. In OP's case she has daughters and they wanted a first look.

There are some very beautiful co-ordinated photographs of things like first looks and the same when people give birth too. Judge all you want but most people only imagine getting married once. I had 2 photographers for my wedding, one for me and one for Dh to capture getting ready as well as different angles at the church.

The MIL in this case has posted images of children without their Mother's consent.

Edited

But we don’t know it’s without their fathers consent.

All the rest of your post is batshit Americanised nonsense!

The daughters would know nothing about first looks, this was put in their heads by OP no doubt.

Barrenfieldoffucks · 01/09/2025 16:48

OneCalmReader · 01/09/2025 15:57

I’m not sure why people are triggered about having a content creator at my wedding or the fact my 11 year old wanted to record a first look. That’s not the point I’m trying to get at. My MIL went against my wishes.

What, by entering the room? Get over yourself.

Heronwatcher · 01/09/2025 16:48

FloralAllTheWay · 01/09/2025 16:37

What a lovely way with words you have. No, beautiful shots of the Mother and Father enjoying their child being born rather than just the Dad taking photos on his camera phone. A professional photographer. Luckily my Dh is an incredible photographer, but many people are not.

This is a ridiculous idea. Mother either having had a long labour or heavily anaesthetised, father quite possibly traumatised, medical staff trying to do their job and see to the newborn/ mum, baby looking pretty dodgy in most cases and someone thinks a photographer is a sensible addition. Does the NHS even allow this? If I was a midwife/ doctor I’d tell them to get lost. And what if something goes wrong? Far better to do a nice shoot at home once everyone’s recovered a bit and the baby looks less like a shrivelled cucumber.

AiryFairyLights · 01/09/2025 16:49

Dartmoorcheffy · 01/09/2025 16:09

Oh sweetheart, im most certainly not triggered and I bet your mother in law thinks your a bit of a dick too. Get a grip for God's sakes.

Comment of the entire thread - although there’s been loads of great ones 😂😂😂😂
The whole thing sounds batshit crazy to me 😂😂

Letsgoroundagainnow · 01/09/2025 16:49

2chocolateoranges · 01/09/2025 16:44

Wow, Mumsnet is full of nasty people judging the OP.
Many brides have first looks, (even I did and I got married in 2000) many brides have content creators. It’s the joy of weddings now

get your dh to tell her to take the photo down now, block her on all social media and do not allow her access to any of your photos.

keep reporting it to Facebook.

She blocked her last week…..

According to her previous post.

Mirabai · 01/09/2025 16:50

FloralAllTheWay · 01/09/2025 16:37

What a lovely way with words you have. No, beautiful shots of the Mother and Father enjoying their child being born rather than just the Dad taking photos on his camera phone. A professional photographer. Luckily my Dh is an incredible photographer, but many people are not.

That’s so weird.

How many birthing units allow professional photographers?

Mirabai · 01/09/2025 16:51

Heronwatcher · 01/09/2025 16:48

This is a ridiculous idea. Mother either having had a long labour or heavily anaesthetised, father quite possibly traumatised, medical staff trying to do their job and see to the newborn/ mum, baby looking pretty dodgy in most cases and someone thinks a photographer is a sensible addition. Does the NHS even allow this? If I was a midwife/ doctor I’d tell them to get lost. And what if something goes wrong? Far better to do a nice shoot at home once everyone’s recovered a bit and the baby looks less like a shrivelled cucumber.

Snap.

silkypyjamas · 01/09/2025 16:51

I would never share or post a photo of a bride before she has put her own photos online.. I thought that was rule #1 for anyone with an ounce of common sense and decency. Same with newborns and 'firsts' for any person. I'm not particularly bothered with SM myself but I just wouldn't do it.

Boomer55 · 01/09/2025 16:51

yeesh · 01/09/2025 15:57

🤣🤣🤣

Not sure whst a first look is 🤷‍♀️ but FB won’t get involved in family squabbles. Unfriend her if it bothers you.

Swipe left for the next trending thread