Let me ask you this. If every time a person wanted to cheat on their partner, the person they were interest in cheating with declined to do it with them, would that person be able to cheat?
Again, not blaming my husband for my own actions. That goes back to reasons vs. justifications— “these needs were unmet, which influenced my decision to take immoral actions” vs “these needs were not met so it was morally correct to cheat (with the insinuation that it’s the fault of DH that the needs weren’t met, and therefore the fault of DH that the cheating happened)” Do you see the difference?
Yes, I am saying that AP should have stayed away from me and/or not continued to interact with me when he realized it was more than platonic, because I am married and he knew that. I would also never get involved with a married person again, even if I was single, because that’s morally wrong.
I used the phrase “additional blame” because a lot of people seem to think of blame as some solid, inseparable thing that gets placed on one individual involved in an affair, like it’s “100%” or nothing. It’s more like a thing that can be divided as many times as is necessary without ever diminishing in mass/quantity, with no quantifiable total percentage…
So a person who is committed to monogamy with a partner is in control of themselves and is primarily responsible for any infidelity that they commit. That’s one dollop of blame on the cheater (I like to think of it like a gooey black blob from a little tub that you paste onto someone’s forehead).
Then there’s the AP, who knew the cheater was committed to someone else, who also in control of themselves, who still decided to be actively complicit in the other person’s infidelity, which harms the cheater’s partner. Divide the dollop of blame we put on the cheater, and put some on the AP (though maybe it’s a smaller amount.) But the original dollop on the cheater doesn’t get any smaller because it has unlimited mass…hence, “additional blame.”
None goes on the cheater’s partner, of course regardless of the reasons for the cheater’s actions
does that make any sense? Or am I wasting my time again?