Holy shit! I think my family are playing this out but I couldn't see it, until now.
Narc parent is persecutor, narc sibling reluctantly enables them whilst feeling victimised. I'm supposed to pander to narc parent too and pretend like everything is fine just like they're doing, making me the rescuer I guess.
Or is narc sibling the rescuer because they're happier to do the enabling than I am? I certainly feel like a victim but both of them act like I've no right to be one.
Narc sibling was the GC and I'm the SG, if that makes any difference. It's so darned complicated working it all out. I feel as if I'd like to though, to help understand what I've been experiencing lately and get some insight into what comes next.
One time I was unwell and couldn't do the required enabling. Narc sibling, for whatever reason, snapped and said something pretty unforgivable to me (although they have history for doing that so it didn't have the impact it might have done) and I was at that particular moment in time done with the lot of them for that particular time period. That had more of an impact on them than it would have done if I'd reacted that way on any other day, because that particular day was Christmas Day and I refused to see them until after NY. Meaning narc parent didn't get what they wanted.
The second I'd reacted, narc parent flipped the scenario, making themselves the victim (narc parent has always liked to act the victim) and narc sibling the persecutor. Even though narc parent was the one who started it all with their demanding narcissim in the first place!
So I was definitely left as the rescuer in this new scenario and I refused to do it. Even though narc parent must have made narc siblings life hell, because narc sibling doubled down with a manipulative nicey-nicey act, to try to coerce and cajole me into the rescuer role. I knew at the time their apologies weren't sincere and were as a result of experiencing the consequences of their actions, in the form of a tantrum from narc parent. I stood firm, because if I was in their presence the only words I was going to speak would be in anger (justifiably) and after what had just happened, for once I felt I owed neither of them anying. I also didn't want to be accused of starting a row.
I guess that would have meant they could flip the scenario again, if I'd complied then exploded. They could have branded me the persecutor. Leaving the rescuer to comfort the victim, whilst scapegoating me again for reacting to the way I'd been treated?
Things have never been the same since, now I think about it. So I have a question for you all -
What happens when two narcs both see themselves as the victim and the other as the persecutor (I think?), but both see me as the problem because I resist the role of rescuer and barely comply? Their triangle doesn't work, so what now? I can see no obvious third party to be manoeuvred into the role of rescuer, I think it may still be me, as unsatisfactory as they're finding me to be.
So does that mean they've flipped it again and I'm the persecutor now, in their eyes? Even though all I'm doing is minding my own business and living my life. Do they have to make me into the persecutor just so they can keep their triangle going, they can't survive without it?
Well done if you understood all that, it feels incredibly complicated!