@Soverytiredofeverythinggoingon me too.
I have discovered today that it's ablist NOT to refer to Aspergers/Autism as a disability*. If I consider my husband disabled then that's good, but I'm to treat him as if he's not. So his less than socially appropriate behaviours are to be overlooked, because he's disabled. When he gets overwhelmed and hurts our children (emotionally) then denies it, I'm supposed to treat him as I would anybody else..but keep in mind he's disabled. If anybody else behaved like that with my children they'd be shown the door, but because I know he has Aspergers, I make allowances (so terribly ablist of me) and try to get help. That's not good either because it shows I'm not accepting his uniqueness.
I feel like this is an Emperor's New Clothes situation: I know he has Aspergers, the kids know there's something different, according to popular MN opinion I'm supposed to acknowledge his disability but we're all supposed to completely pretend and respond as though it's not there.
Doesn't make sense.
*I rarely use the term "disabled" about anybody, because I find that word "othering", which to me smacks of a ablism! And