Further on
The name of this thread is inappropriate, it is misleading and does not represent at all the real contents of thread.
The content is potentially discriminatory and stigmatising.
The new title should be:
Breakdown in relationship with someone with Asperger's? Support group here!
This thread does nothing to support the relationship, it provides no support for those who are married (as in the title) and want to maintain and improve the relationship, it offers little on how to make it work, how to improve communication, how to avoid pitfalls. (this is recognised at the bottom pf page 20 I'm going to take a break from this thread because the traits and issues I want to talk about feel minor in compared to the recent posts, and tbh I feel uncomfortable posting about ASD...)
Shockingly it offers no insight into, does not use ASD knowledge to unpick how the condition affects a relationship. Even when a trace of an insight into ASD appears on page 16, it is negated by an embittered confrontational blame passed as ‘advice’ (ChangerOfNameAspieThread Sat 26-Jan-19 15:46:29).
As said by AutisticHedgehog Sun 20-Jan-19 01:03:38 ..there is a real lack of understanding about autism on this thread
The resources referenced in the OP are controversial and unhelpful to inform the broader topic about partners and marriage with people with ASC. There are some links to other resources, but no discussion and reference to broader perspective from reliable sources of information and advice. There is nothing in the thread to actually understand and analyse the dynamics of the relationship with someone with ASD, as purported in the OP.
There is a recognition of reflecting a particular problem, but not enough to analyse it as stated in the OP:
QueenieInFrance Sat 19-Jan-19 16:55:19
Not all people with autism are struggling in their relationship I don't think.
Its a particular mix that I think is particularly hard to make workable.
In fact there is notable absence of perspectives on the dynamics, which ought to encompass both partners. Absent is reflection on posters own passive-aggressiveness, difficulties with assertiveness, empathy and communication.
The thread is filled with examples of posters failing to establish and maintain real communication with their ASD partner from the onset, failure to actually empathize and understand their ASD partner, failure of being assertive and establish boundaries and balance in their relationship. Many posters admit having difficulties with assertiveness, self-esteem, with history of upbringing in an abusive relationship of their parents, history of being previously in abusive relationships, even of BPD. These factors would invariably contribute to the dynamic of the relationship. Poor communication, inability to assert own needs and balance the relationship would lead to breakdown with a NT partner as well. It takes two to tango and posters need to take their part of responsibility for the relationship failure, but nothing of sort is happening in this thread. Instead ASD is used as lightening road, creating prejudice.
Instead it contains off the cuff advice to posters who are just starting a relationship to not even try and to walk away from ASD partners (like on page 4). We wouldn't advocate to not ever cross the road because of risk of being hit by a car, but that is what is channelled on this thread. Somehow posters' specific dysfunctional relationships should be taken as the wisdom on the subject of ASD partners in general. This is irresponsible and creates prejudice for people with ASD, that they don't deserve to have a partner and should be left in isolation...
Posters don’t have recognised qualifications in Psychology/Psychiatry/ASD to analyse the issues, and show regrettable absence of awareness about ASD and its’s central issues of theory of mind and problems with emotional understanding, yet they make sweeping generalisations that introduce confusion if not conflation of ASD with anti-social personality disorder, abuse and narcissism. This is dangerous.
ASD is used to apportion blame but not to actually understand the dynamic of interactions and seek positive improvements. i.e. many posts on page 7, 8, 9 The post [ChangerOfNameAspieThread Tue 15-Jan-19 08:58:14] does more harm than good with failing to discuss the impairment in theory of mind and emotional understanding and instead side tracking on ‘remorse’. The post [ChangerOfNameAspieThread Wed 16-Jan-19 06:50:57] lead to confusion with psychopathy. Far from ‘stopping confusing [ASD] behaviour’ with abuse [TimeIhadaNameChange Tue 15-Jan-19 10:03:11], these posts do add to the confusion and create dangerous new myths and prejudices.
Further, the thread OP even attempts to limit the expression of views that could balance the discourse and provide alternative perspectives and narratives by issuing warning to :
(ASD partners welcome to lurk or pop in, but please don't argue with other posters and tell them they are wrong.) and aggressively attacking contributions in the thread (page 8 and 9, [ThisWayDown Sat 19-Jan-19 21:54:47])
This is preposterous if the implication of the thread is the isolation and prejudice against partnering with people with a disability.
Posters have their right for validation and support in exiting their failed relationships, but it should not be allowed to be portrayed as the advice on the relationship with partners with ASD in general because of its inaccurate and prejudicial nature in relation to a protected characteristic.
The thread title should be changed.
There should also be some comment qualifying the scope and validity of theories proposed (e.g. on page 7) and advice given.
This thread seem helpful to those in late stages of relationship breakdown, but imo it does more harm than good for those seeking to understand the relationship with partners with ASD and seeking support to maintain and further the relationship and marriage. It completely misses the pivotal really helpful insight to achieve these aims. Potentially it creates prejudices and barriers for autistic people to enter relationships, including for autistic children of the very posters, as Seline on page 8 highlighted.