Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Relationships

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you need help urgently or expert advice, please see our domestic violence webguide and/or relationships webguide. Many Mumsnetters experiencing domestic abuse have found this thread helpful: Listen up, everybody

Would you date a man...

109 replies

PrettyLittIeThing · 01/04/2018 11:21

That doesn't work? (Just wondering.)

OP posts:
Fidgety31 · 01/04/2018 11:21

Not if that’s his lifestyle choice no

FrancisUnderwood · 01/04/2018 11:22

who doesn't work?

Adversecamber22 · 01/04/2018 11:23

It would depend, I have been made redundant in the past and was lucky enough to get another job straight away. That situation is understandable, short term u employment fine.

If it was someone long term unemployed then I wouldn't have been interested. I would also understand that it would have put potential partners off of me as well.

Angelf1sh · 01/04/2018 11:25

Depends. If they’re a PhD student - yes. If they volunteer instead of paid work - yes. If they’re a stay at home dad - yes. If they sit around watching tv all day doing nothing else- no.

stitchglitched · 01/04/2018 11:26

Depends- retired, main carer for someone/ young kids, made redundant and job hunting etc I'd consider it. Single man with no other responsibilities who just choses not to work absolutely not.

PrettyLittIeThing · 01/04/2018 11:26

Yes who doesn't work. Grin

As a lifestyle choice.

OP posts:
HerBigChance · 01/04/2018 11:29

No. Not if that's his choice and he's not seriously looking after being made redundant etc. I don't expect a man to support me, but I do expect him to support himself. I've been 'understanding' about all this in my twenties and would never bother again.

SemiConsciousRobot · 01/04/2018 11:32

How is your hypothetical man supporting this lifestyle choice?

If he had made enough money to support himself without working, e.g. by setting up a business, then I don't see a problem with it. There are plenty of worthwhile and fulfilling things to do with your time other than work if you don't need to. If, on the other hand, he was choosing to live off handouts from other taxpayers then no.

Adversecamber22 · 01/04/2018 11:33

As a lifestyle choice absolutely no way.

PrettyLittIeThing · 01/04/2018 11:37

On benefits but with no intention of working.

OP posts:
Purplerain101 · 01/04/2018 11:37

Definitely not. They don’t have to be wealthy by any means, but i’d Find the laziness and lack of ambition a huge turn off. The only times it’s acceptable to not work at all when under retirement age are things like certain disabilities, being a carer (which is probably a lot harder than most full time jobs) or being made redundant etc (although in that instance I would expect them to be trying to find something else). Even if I met someone who was wealthy enough to not work i’d be turned off if they weren’t doing anything productive at all with their time such as studying or volunteering

stitchglitched · 01/04/2018 11:38

Does he have health issues/ main care of any kids? What is he able to claim without any intention of working?

SemiConsciousRobot · 01/04/2018 11:42

Nope. If you're describing it as a "lifestyle choice" then he's clearly not disabled and is capable of work. Why would you even consider dating someone so lazy and with no sense of shame for expecting to live off everyone else? Hardly attractive qualities! Confused

PrettyLittIeThing · 01/04/2018 11:46

No kids to look after and yes capable of working. We are talking about jsa (pretty easy to claim with no intention of actually working since this is how he has got by for years according to him.)

OP posts:
HerBigChance · 01/04/2018 11:47

I tend to agree that even being very wealthy means someone should be doing something creative or productive with their time. The fact that this man isn't remotely bothered about describing it as a 'lifestyle choice' suggests to me he'd be uncaring in so many other aspects of life too.

Purplerain101 · 01/04/2018 11:48

Why are you interested in him? If he has zero physical/mental health issues then he’s just a lazy so and so

stitchglitched · 01/04/2018 11:48

Then no, he sounds lazy and useless.

PrettyLittIeThing · 01/04/2018 11:50

No I'm not interested I turned him down. (Known him a while but just a friends.) he thinks it's wrong that I turned him down for this reason and said that it's not put any women off before so I wondered how many women would actually date an unemployed man who had no intentions of working.

OP posts:
mzcracker · 01/04/2018 11:51

Not in that situation no. I would assume he was lazy and that laziness and lack of effort or ambition would extend to every area of his life including a relationships.

Littlechocola · 01/04/2018 11:52

No. I want someone with ambition and drive not someone who wants to do nothing by choice. If he had a reason for not working it would be different but as a lifestyle choice no.

m0vinf0rward · 01/04/2018 11:52

I'd shop him. Can't stand useless, lazy people who take the piss.

Littlechocola · 01/04/2018 11:52

His attitude stinks.

mzcracker · 01/04/2018 11:52

Posted too soon. I was also going to add that benefits don't pay much as far as I know jsa is about £80 pw for a single person? Open to being corrected here, but you would end up subsidising all trips, days out etc.

AaronPurrSir · 01/04/2018 11:54

Cocklodger in the making.

SemiConsciousRobot · 01/04/2018 11:54

Probably only a certain type of woman who has similar "values" to him, OP. I can't imagine any of the women I know having any interest in such a loser.

Swipe left for the next trending thread