But in my gut I just don't feel sure she should be labeled an abuser and have her kids taken off her.
who said she should have her kids removed?
She is an abuser because she abuses her husband. On three occasion.
I think her husband needs to leave her. But I think since she is the abuser, she should be the one to leave. At least until she gets some help. This is the third time it's happened and she hasn't got any help yet.
Eastenders isn't normal life. No one live like they do on Eastenders, it's a fictional TV programme.
The point is saying 'I hate myself for doing this but it's only been three times/ it's not as bad when women do it/ his behaviours drives me to it/it's my hormones' is typical abuser behaviour and it's not taking responsibility.
It doesn't matter how much damaged someone does when they abuse a partner. The point is that she is asserting power over him, because she knows she can hit him and he won't hit her back. Wether she damages him or not isn't the point.
Hitting someone you know can't fight back is bullying behaviour.
Do you think a man physically a using his wife isn't that bad unless he bruises or hurts her? If he shoves her, or gives a slap but not hard enough to leave a mark, is that ok?