Thanks for your posts AbanicoDos - they have certainly helped me. I've also just had a similar experience to yours with my apparently very well qualified psychodynamic psychotherapist. It is good to know that its not just me!
I've just sent the terminating email to her now. Even before reading your thread, I was really beginning to feel that our therapist/patient dynamic felt pretty dysfunctional and well. There's always some excuse or that she didn't mean it like that, or whatever.
To top it off, she couldn't call my husband an 'abuser' [I'm suffering from EA] because she wasn't in the room when it happened, and for all she knows, I could be over-reacting. FFS!!! In the incident in question, I felt physically threatened (during a heated argument, my husband started getting aggressive and was punching his fist into the other hand again and again, and when burst into tears saying he was frightening me, claimed it was my fault for provoking him - classy).
I mentioned that I've just read Lundy Bancroft's book 'Why does he do that?' and she's never heard of Lundy Bandcroft. And she asked if there was a chapter on the type of women who go for abusive men. Why should there be a chapter for the type of woman? I was under the impression that while there may be risk factors (e.g. having been abused in childhood etc) that abuse cut through all sectors of society/types of people.
And anyway, abuse is always the fault of the perpetrator, not the victim- so what point would there be? There would be a fine line between finding commonality in victims and then victim blaming.