I have not heard of the "filter" concept which Merry mentioned, but I do believe in the idea of "temperament" (personalities) and how our brains are wired (learned from when we are young). There can be a little bit of difference in communication style due to culture and how we are brought up. I personally do believe this. I also believe that regardless of this difference anyway, two people can still exist and be together also.
However I was a bit slow, sometimes not realising he was speaking to me or not understanding things he was saying (and to be fair, he mumbles) so at one point he said: "what is wrong with you?" Now this sentence really sets me off, I particularly hates this sentence for no reason but I just said that I was very tires and felt like a zombie...before I would start a fight just because he used that sentence to talk to me.
To me, he is saying that you are not focused on him when he tries to initiate the communication. When you did not receive in exactly what he tried to communicate, he got frustrated and said "what is wrong with you". He also wore his rose-tinted glasses and judged you against his standard. Hence his negative comment of "what is wrong with you" to let you know that the problem is not on his side but it must be you. I can understand and appreciate why you wrote that this sets you off. Because I guess what he said must be very "accusative" from your side. i.e. you did something wrong according to him, (Even though you are unaware of what he is judging you against. Since you do not know the rules to this standard.)
Later on we were talking about a particular restaurant we were next to and he said if I had been there. I said yes I have. Than I said not that one but another branch. He than started to tell me how I don't answers the questions properly and how I send mixed messages because he asked that particular branch not another one and than I say YES but after few seconds I say NO...so we started discussing our communication issues and I just established that I assumed that by there he meant that particular restaurant and I understood the whole restaurant chain etc, so I am not sure here if this is me or him who is "in the wrong"...
Well, to me, it is clear that you both "think on different wavelengths". You know, in a situation like what you guys encountered, even if you do not understand what he means or you did not catch him, try to figure it out by responding back to him. Do one of the followings;
1- Either ask him to repeat it again "Sorry, I did not hear you correctly."
2- Or if you are not sure what he meant, change what you thought in your mind, in the form of a question e.g. "Did you mean the chain ?"
Some people literally uses speech to communicate with one another, but others put more emphasis on body languages first. They can see your body language first over your speech, and then changes what they say accordingly to how they think it will be received. A lot of non-communication or communication failure happens when two people uses a different method.
The video is about different personalities. Even so, we can overcome our own personalities to see beyond ourselves and find a more rounded way to communicate. This video is a great demonstration of non-verbal communication. I was watching this last night. This is a tactile interaction. The guy wanted to "bond" or feel closer to the girl, so he made sure that his body language is exactly like hers. (Does your partner ever do this with you? Sit close to you, or mimic your actions too? And did you ever realised his body language when he does this?)
Another very complex interaction, but then they are both professionals and "get" each other. Their verbal communication is very complex, but very entertaining.
When Julia mentioned that David has only 1 child only, and he reaffirmed this, he then also said something negative, to see if she did mean it as a negative thing, and this caught her out. Hence she laughed. Meaning, she did cheekily said something, whether intentional or not as negative.
They are both not very tactile people, BUT, they do show "appreciation" by repeating information which shows the other person in a good light. So Julia told the public that he gave her flowers every year. You can tell how happy this made him and he smiled. They are using their voices, as well as their body language too to show one another that they are happy about things. Then later David did apologise very directly, and you can see when he apologised and told the excuse, he did look remorseful. He also "exaggerated" (maybe to give more empathy and emphasis as well) that she is only one of the few celebrities that he cares about in this industry. (Note: Both of these celebrities have done an interview for the past 10 or so years, so this is a true reflection of their working relationship.) Then you can tell Julia teased him, and when David was insulted, she then apologised too by saying "sorry". If you noticed, they were also facing one another as well when they are talking.
That is how a proper communication should be:
Person A - B - A - B - A - B - A - B etc.
Happy-upset-joke-laugh-confusion-clarify etc etc...
(=Positive-negative-positive-negative etc)