Hmm. I'm of two minds.
I've got two dates lined up in the next week. The Venezuelan, seems intelligent, attractive, although we haven't mailed often enough for there to be a spark - it's taken forever to get mutual free time to meet.
and another one, I'm meant to drive an hour or so one evening next week. I'd planned both to be coffee, but I could get the train to the second one, and have some alcohol.
Now I know this whole concept of a quick meeting for coffee before risking the wine/beer/champagne and food thing is a good idea - it stops the issue of beer goggles, it means you don't have the awkwardness of spending two hours with someone you realise you don't like after 10 minutes.
But it's a bit businesslike, isn't it? Does it reduce the possibility of a spark when there's no letting down of your guard? When I met the psychotherapist we had a drink for an hour or so in a starbucks. Starbucks isn't the most romantic place in the world - did that reduce the likelihood of long lingering glances? If we'd gone somewhere to have a beer or wine - just one or two - would that have maybe meant we would have been more flirty, more keen and not had the barriers up so much?
Should I plan just a little booze for a 'first meeting' - enough to take my barriers down and let my ready wit and charm come forth, instead of guaranteeing they stay up and possibly not fancying her as much as I could if I met her in a bar?