"www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2011/nov/10/truth-lap-dancer-clubs "
Have read this and it is highly anecdotal. One of the only proper surveys (the only one I can find) on this is the below:
www.sociology.leeds.ac.uk/assets/files/research/events/PreliminaryMediaAug2010.pdf
Among the conclusions:
"Education: All of the dancers had some education and had finished school with some qualifications. 87% had completed at least Further Education, while 25% had completed an undergraduate degree. Just over one third of dancers were students. 31% of dancers were currently in some form of education, making students a significant proportion of dancers. 3.8% were taking further education courses, 13.9% were using dancing to help fund an undergraduate degree and 6.3% for a postgraduate degree
Job satisfaction amongst dancers was strikingly high. Asked to score their job satisfaction from 0 to 10 with 10 being the highest, a significant proportion (84.4%) rated their satisfaction above five and only 5.3% rated their satisfaction
Respect: Dancers were also asked how respected they felt within the workplace. This time, the majority (59.2%) were neutral, stating that they neither felt respected nor disrespected. Despite this neutrality, significantly more dancers said that they felt Respected or Very Respected (33.8%) than Disrespected or Very Disrespected (7%).at less than five."
In the interests of balance, it is far from all rosy and Leeds University published their comments on all the positive comments received in the media here:
www.sociology.leeds.ac.uk/about/news/lap-dancers-degrees.php
The chief negative commentary is below:
"Dancers told Dr Teela Sanders and Kate Hardy about unsafe working conditions, lack of insurance, inconsistency of income and fines or high fees in some clubs. The reports also tended to disguise the profound variations between the standards and management in different clubs. Researchers found some clubs were well run but others were significantly more dangerous or exploitative.
This important research was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and involved a survey of 300 dancers, and interviews with workers, industry management and regulators. "
Of course this was a survey of 300 dancers (better than anecdote, though) and maybe, to some extent, they were self selected. However as a reputable survey by two academics and peer reviewed, I assume they attempted to balance for this.
The reality is that, whist some in the industry may be exploited, in reputable clubs, the majority are clearly not.