What's likely to have happened here is that the CPS were not expecting a guilty plea today as, even in the face of irrefutable evidence of guilt, it's uncommon for guilty pleas to be entered at a first appearance in the Magistrates Court.
From what you've said, it doesn't appear that the Court have ordered any reports, probation or otherwise, nor have they imposed any conditions of bail that place any restriction on him.
As it appears he's entered guilty pleas to all 3 charges and sentence has been deferred to a later date, he'll keep his licence in the interim and is free to drive whenever and wherever he chooses.
VS can suspect all they want as to why no conditions have been applied to his further remand on bail pending sentence but, effectively, he's been rewarded for being a good boy and 'fessing up thus saving the hard-pressed justice service money time and sparing you the ordeal of giving evidence againt him.
It should be noted that defendants who plead guity and throw themselves on the mecy of the Court are usually thrown a slim volume rather than a weighty tome that might knock some sense into them acts as deterrent as well as due punishment for their crimes.
As for VS's assurance that 'his probation will still cover him 'harrassing/assaulting' me further', as he hasn't been sentenced he is not on probation although, of course, his counsel will have had a word in his shell-like on the advisability of behaving in an exemplary manner until sentence has been passed.
The next hearing is a done deal in that sentence(s) will be handed down. In the absence of a trial, it's likely the CPS will allocate the case to inexperienced junior counsel who may not take issue with, or raise spirited objection to, any of the defence's heartwrenching violins pleas in mitigation.
When you made your statement to the police were you asked, or have you been asked at any time since by the police or VS, if you wanted to make a 'victim personal statement'?
Unless you have been invited to meet with the relevant CPS lawyer prior to the sentencing hearing, it would seem probable that this is the only way your voice can/will be heard in Court.
I mentioned earlier that it's not unusual for security gaps, as it were, to be left in victims' fences and I trust that your solicitor will make ex parte application for a non-molestation Order or similar injunction as a matter of urgency.
With regard to possible contact from him/ILs, maintain the line that you cannot enter into any conversation until such time as the criminal Court proceedings are at an end.
With regard to him making application for contact with the dc, I would anticipate that he may do so sometime shortly after the end of the current proceedings as I have no doubt that your ex-ILs will be anxious to sweep everything under the carpet see the dc during the festive season.
Please do not be under any illusion that this is the 1st time he's EVER accepted responsibility for ANYTHING.
No doubt the word 'sorry' will be overused feature in his pleas for mitigation; he'll claim to be sorry for what he's done but in reality he'll only be sorry for himself.
He's pleaded guilty as a matter of expediency as he will have been advised this is likely to attract consideraby lighter penalties than would have been incurred had he contested the evidence against him and been found guilty.
Regardless of whatever plea is entered, the harsh fact is the punishment that is meted out to violent offenders is rarely commeasurate with the punishment they have inflicted on their victims.