Fucking hell, silver talk about drip-feeding! 
Assuming you're genuine, this only changes things on a small legal technicality - it's sexual assault, not rape, but it's still just as serious.
Some people on this thread could do with looking at the MN 'we believe you' Rape Myth Busting page, particularly this:
MYTH: Rape can't take place in an ongoing relationship
Previous consent to sex does not imply ongoing consent, and sex without consent is rape.
REALITY: Previous consent to sex does not imply ongoing consent, and sex without consent is rape. It makes no difference whether the aggressor is a woman's husband or partner, or a complete stranger - 22% of rapes are committed by partners or ex-partners.
It's irrelevant whether or not a person is in a relationship with someone or has had sex with them previously. Lord Judge, Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, told a court to approach rape within a relationship, including marriage, as "no less serious than rape by a stranger".
Consent must be given every time two people engage in sexual contact. Sex without consent is rape.
BUSTED! By Mumsnetter Mme Lindor