As far as the Bethlem is concerned, it seems to me that you've got them bang to rights and they'll have no alternative but to come out with their hands up make you an offer which you will be best advised to refuse until you've wrung the pips out out them there's a proposal on the table that truly reflects the harm done to your ds and, by default, yourself by his ill-fated stay in the Bill Yule and, if they fail to comply, no doubt the prospect of a Court hearing with attendant publicity will concentrate their minds.
The various legal processes are likely to take some considerable period of time, but as you've got a solicitor on the case you can afford to put that particular matter on your back burner while you concentrate on more immediate concerns relating to your ds's current placement and longer term future.
For this, we need to go back to page 17 and focus on why it was deemed necessary for your ds to be sectioned.
You've said that, as far as you're aware, the 'tipping point' for the medics in Woking was the discovery of your ds's 'hit list'; the diary in which he recorded his thoughts and/or desires to harm certain other persons.
As it's not uncommon for the turbulence of adolescence to give rise to sometimes violent fantasies that may be written down but aren't acted out, it seems to me that you may wish to obtain a second opinion as to your ds's alleged psychosis by an acknowledged expert in the field of Asperger's.
Obviously, it would be advisable to allow time for your ds to settle after the uncertainty and disruption of the past few months but, again it seems to me, it would be in his best interests for any second opinion to be obtained either before his current 6 month section 3 is reviewed in May or, if renewed, before November as thereafter reviews will be held on an annual basis.
To this end, after you have had opportunity to visit your ds, I would suggest that you ask your solicitor to liaise with your ds's lawyer and ask him/her to ascertain their client's views although, of course, it may be that your visit will serve to put your mind at rest with regard to provision for his current and future care and treatment, and with regard to contact arrangements for yourself and for your ds's family members.
Please don't get the impression from the above that I've put the Bethlem on my own back burner as I fully intend to continue to dig up as much as possible in support of your case against that incompetent bunch of fuckers institution and, of course, the fact that your ds was the victim of an attempted abduction while he was on the lam able to leave a secure unit without let or hindrance and roam around at will has yet to be fully addressed.
I sincerely hope you'll stay on this thread for a while longer as continuity is key to gaining the necessary overview that will reveal where shortcomings in your/your ds's experience of adolescent mental health services have occured and will give indication of what steps can be taken to ensure more positive outcomes for you both.
FTR should you not be able to obtain satisfaction in law, if your constituency MP does not have a special interest or experience in the field of mental health, you may find it expedient to put your case before an MP who sits on a relevant Parliamentary committee.
.