Sex question - fairly extreme

[gymsleepandfreedom]

Right, so apologies in advance for the nature of this question but I was discussing it with a friend and it got me thinking...

Would you let your DP/DH erm.... ejaculate in your face? I think it's quite demeaning, she didn't, I wanted a wider opinion.

at cybilliberty

Yep I do. It's hardly extreme...

Puffin

Can't anyone tell me why it's demeaning? If you're with your lover...surely his spunk is a part of him....shouldn't people be able to enjoy ALL that sex involves?

Is it demeaning to a man to get vaginal secretions on his face?

No stings eyes and terrible to get out of your hair.

Over boobs is better, easier to wash.

I'm not sure why some people think it's demeaning - it's normal to us.
I wouldn't let him wee all over me though - and you could say that's part of him - ( not that he's ever asked )

Seejane: I agree with you as it's something I really enjoy but then some people enjoy scat while I personally find that disgusting. So I suppose there will always be some sexual practices that people enjoy that others find a turn off.

I suspect people think that it's demaning because it's a "porn" thing. But then so is oral sex, missionary and other "normal" things.

So do the people who find it demeaning find sex in general demeaning?

Nurseblade when i opened this thread i was expecting something scat related!

that i consider extreme.

err...i also thought it was part of 'normal' sex..well not for everyone but fairly commonplace...have done it a lot with one nighters and in long term relationships! love it!

I just think of that song " I'm the scat man"

if it's your bag and you like it,it's not demeaning.

I've seen some pretty hardcore Victorian erotic images and they were taking part in all these acts (and worse),lets not blame it personal pleasing erotic acts and behaviour on modern day porn eh?

I would hazard a guess that most women have had sperm on another part of their body rather than just in their vagina's.

Prevalence in porn films has made it quite mainstream, I think it would have been considered extreme in the 70s when I came of age. I think a lot of men want to do it as they've seen it in porn.

It's not a safe sex activity, several STDs can infect the eye including the very common chlamydia so should not be risked in anything but a very secure, monogomous relationship

As I said, if its what makes both of you happy, then fine, but it just really wouldnt turn me on.

His spit is part of him, but I wouldnt like it if he spat on my face either.

Everyone finds different things a turn on, or a turn off, and each to their own.

I do say it is down to porn. I never met a man who wanted to cum on my face throughout my dating in teens and twenties. Since coming back "on the scene" in later life, it's not been an uncommon request.

From my experience,my dh ends up with alot of my 'personal fluid' on his face.

He's never complained about being degraded though.

Each to their own.

No not there but maybe elsewhere.....

Porn fuelled along with most men under the age of 25 thinking all women are shaven.

Is it the act of ejaculation that makes it a demeaning act?

well otherwise he would just be waving his willy around over her nose.. which would just look a bit daft..

I wished I hadnt looked up scat yuk that is extreme.

Its happened to me before,with no warning
wasnt very nice and then whilst spluttering i realise he'd whipped out his phone..
Lurvly

surely having a face stuck in your vagina/clit looks equally ridiculous?

amiheartless...I hope you dumped that particulat disrespectful fucker forthwith ?

unless you are happy for your cum-filled face to be others wank fodder ?

double yuk