Why do you make the distinction? They are all exploitative of women. Why does your DP want to go to these places at all?
Whenever these threads arise, female posters with partners who go to these clubs, assign the men into two categories. The ones who go for the sexual thrill and the ones who insist that they only go because their mates want to, despite the fact that they are paying four times the price of a drink.
I'm sure the latter group of posters would rather think of their partners as weak and stupid, rather than misogynistic, but what does that say about those men and how they have been infantilised by their female partners?
The posters in the first group who are at least honest and admit that their partners are going for the sexual thrill, defend this by claiming that they are totally secure in their relationships and that their partners have an entirely different view of the lapdancers than they have of their female relatives. In doing so, they admit that the men divide women into two camps; the sort of women it's okay to leer at and "normal" women where that behaviour is unacceptable.
Why is it ever acceptable to say that some women are more equal than others?
This argument is the same as it is for prostitution. All the while people are prepared to pay for a woman's sexuality and not her individual skills, talents and humanity, we will never have an equal society.