@Regularsizedrudy Not going to bother with a decent reply to this one! 🙈
@OrionNebula appreciate the challenge, always good to hear both sides.
Hep B - of course, though I'm basing this on my own risk and that of my child. I don't have Hep B, would be happy to test for it beforehand, and also don't plan on putting my newborn on any dodgy surfaces! So I judge my own risk to be minimal.
Polio - agree of course that vaccines have helped to keep numbers down. Having said that, cases had already fallen by 55% by 1953 and that was before the vaccine rollout. NHS website states polio symptoms as: "Most people who get polio do not have symptoms.Some people get mild, flu-like symptoms". Again, low risk though of course there are rare exceptions, as there are to all diseases.
Measles - here's one of the studies. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23575988/
Again, mostly based on hypothesis. Unfortunately, that's all that it ever can be based on.. to prove causation based on vaccine exposure alone is near impossible.. which I suppose is why it will always be such a controversial subject.
Aluminium - so WHO says aluminium study is flawed due to being based on population average hypothesis, but is also unable to prove otherwise. That's why vaccine studies (both for and against) can and will always be challenged!
Re. ingested v injected aluminium, a newborn's body is so tiny and even less equipped to remove the toxin. It's hard to prove at which levels it becomes dangerous, but it has never been rigourously evaluated.
@MissConductUS sorry to hear you were one of the rarer cases, and I do see that there is always a risk.
On another personal note, as a child I had a serious reaction to first (and only) MMR vaccine (seizures), which probably makes me more risk averse when it comes to vaccination.