@Pearldrops04 I think the answer is probably both that the nhs stats under-state it and that it comes up more commonly on mn than is necessarily representative of the pregnant population as a whole because it’s a safe space for people to talk about what they’re going through.
I don’t know, but I would be pretty confident the nhs stats are based on number of pregnancies that they are notified of which end in mc - so a mc that happens before the mum is referred to her midwife unit or has her booking in probably isn’t included in the numbers. If that makes sense? I think there are quite a lot of early mcs which might not be recorded anywhere.
The other thing I’ve noticed is that a lot of people on the ttc board test really early. That’s not a criticism at all - I get it!! But I think, as a result, there’s a greater awareness of very early mcs which might be missed otherwise.
Appreciating that anecdotal evidence has very little weight… of the 9 sisters/v close friends of mine that have children/have been pregnant, 4 have had mcs and only 1 of the 9 did a test before a missed period. Between them they’ve had 17 pregnancies go to full term and 9 mcs (one friend had an awful experience with recurring mcs).
So, basically, I think it’s somewhere in the middle.
I do think mn has so many benefits (this thread and the lovely people on it being one example!) but I definitely have an increased awareness of risks having spent some time on the ttc board. I really don’t know whether that’s a good thing or a bad thing…