Exactly. If the police are prepared to go as far as fitting up and innocent man in such a high profile case then it would certainly not be beyond their abilities to tamper with the 'evidence' to make it fit. Are people really saying that the police are clever, cunning and corrupt enough to do that but too dim to get their ducks in a row on the most fundamental details? They are hardly going to take a case to court on the basis of a car journey that google maps says is virtually impossible in the timeline. And yet people keep insisting this is the case.
Also since it was revealed that the weapon was a hammer, I've seen lots of 'oh, so not a wooden stick/baton after all then?' As if those witness reports were outright lies. Is there really not a scenario in which they can imagine that a hammer, especially when held by the business end, could look very much like the 12 inch wooden pole or stick is was described as, from CCTV?? Are these people thick or just wilfully obtuse?
I don't understand what is driving this reluctance to believe the police have a credible suspect in custody, from activists on the further side of the right. I mean if it turns out Kerry held far left wing ideologies and we are told his motive was a hatred of Reform then that plays into the hands of the right quite nicely anyway, so why try to suggest it was someone/something else entirely?
I can see why people on the more 'progressive' side of the left might be highly motivated to steer people away from that idea though, and to suggest that some 'far right terrorist' did it.
But given the target was big in Reform and big on Brexit and big on traditional, conservative Christian values, that makes no sense at all.