Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Anyone else think Starmer leaving just creates more turmoil?

132 replies

CambridgeCats · 09/02/2026 15:22

Not impressed by the communications and mishaps but honestly don’t understand how anyone (other than those who just want a general election / Reform etc) would think that his stepping down is going to help anyone?! The country doesn’t need more turmoil!!!! Ffs!

I appreciate there have been mishaps but why do they think anyone else would do better, especially in foreign policy where he has been the adult in the room. There are no clear standout candidates lining up- all are problematic. Why waste this massive majority?! A new leader would then really have to call a GE, and then they would lose possibly to Reform!

BE CAREFUL WHAT YOU WISH FOR!!

OP posts:
Lynxforthewild · 09/02/2026 16:52

kirinm · 09/02/2026 16:50

I actually found the whole spectacle the last few days so awful to watch that I wrote to my Labour Mp and complained about her colleagues behaviour. Andy Burnham started this and I just don’t know why any of them think getting rid of Starmer is the right thing to do.

I don’t have a labour mp - I would love to fo something like this, and to support Starmer, not sure if that’s possible though

EasternStandard · 09/02/2026 16:54

WonderingWanda · 09/02/2026 16:50

People vote for what they are told by the media and social media and it has become painfully apparent (Brexit, Trump, Reform, Russia, Epstein) that people will be easily influenced and are being manipulated on a massive scale in both the UK and the USA. I'm not 100% sure I trust any of what I hear and see any more.

What is clear to me is that Starmer is the least self serving and most steady of any of the alternatives right now and to get rid of him would be like watching the UK in a slow car crash until we end up with Reform in charge and then living like people in the USA right now.

I see. Only pro Labour then. Anyway for all these posts people will vote as they like and Labour could do badly. Labour on mn will keep going on in this way but at some point votes could get them out.

Zonder · 09/02/2026 16:54

LadyFriend · 09/02/2026 15:35

I would rather he was left alone to get on with the job. There is no one better anyway. Maybe if we stopped changing leaders every five minutes things could actually get done.

This.

Plus the vote on GB news breakfast last week thought he could survive!

WonderingWanda · 09/02/2026 16:55

EasternStandard · 09/02/2026 16:54

I see. Only pro Labour then. Anyway for all these posts people will vote as they like and Labour could do badly. Labour on mn will keep going on in this way but at some point votes could get them out.

Just very anti reform actually

EasternStandard · 09/02/2026 16:56

WonderingWanda · 09/02/2026 16:55

Just very anti reform actually

There’s other parties. Not everyone has to vote as you do. And it’s looking likely many won’t in May.

bigboykitty · 09/02/2026 16:58

MsWilmottsGhost · 09/02/2026 15:32

I'm very disappointed. I hoped we would have some stability once the parade of interchangable Tories was over.

Starmer seemed to be developing a good reputation internationally, and TBH I'd rather keep him than the UK completely lose what little credibility it has left after the Brexit fiasco.

I don't want another procession of weak leaders, and there's no one better waiting in the wings.

Now is not the time. There's too much shite globally, we need to stop bickering and stick together.

I'm not convinced that the baying for Starmers blood isn't being stoked by overseas bad actors who want to weaken the UK further..

Overseas influence is the very reason he became PM in the first place. And we all know who chose the list of Labour candidates for the general election in 2024. And we know who orchestrated the downfall of the previous Labour leader. So...

Dgll · 09/02/2026 16:58

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 09/02/2026 16:29

How do you know he’ll lose the next election?

For the same reason@ his own party think he will lose the next election. According to the polls, he is competing with Liz Truss for the least popular prime minister of all time.

The economy isn't doing well which tends to get any party voted out as no one wants to get poorer.

Lynxforthewild · 09/02/2026 16:59

SpringingUpAgain · 09/02/2026 16:52

I want him to stay. We need some stability in our leadership. Whilst I don't agree with all the decisions Labour have made I feel like he is a professional, qualified adult who is respected on the world stage. I think he handles Trump very well, not sucking up like Reform or the Conservatives, but quietly holding his own. He doesn’t come across as hugely charismatic but I want a PM I feel confident in, not a clown.

Edited

I feel the same way. Starmer is a serious man which is what is needed after the Johnson and Truss embarrassments. You don’t need to be entertained by a PM. I prefer serious in a serious job!

I don’t believe the so called hate for Starmer, again a press line I think. I think he has and is being very badly let down by his trusted advisors and some fellow Labour people, Burnham included as what he did just stoked the fire

Greedybilly · 09/02/2026 16:59

@DenizenOfAisleOfShameyou can't honestly be comparing Starmer to Truss or Johnson. He's not perfect by any means but he's not comparable.
Tory jokers as usual.

Greedybilly · 09/02/2026 17:04

The right wing press/social media/BBC have so much to answer for in this country. Comparing him to Truss or Johnson is ridiculous.
Why isn't the focus on the vile, powerful white men who did something very, very wrong??

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · 09/02/2026 17:04

Greedybilly · 09/02/2026 16:59

@DenizenOfAisleOfShameyou can't honestly be comparing Starmer to Truss or Johnson. He's not perfect by any means but he's not comparable.
Tory jokers as usual.

Really? Not comparable? He’s worse.

ThisDandyWriter · 09/02/2026 17:09

Livingonbananabread · 09/02/2026 15:36

Totally agree with you OP. I find it completely mindboggling that anyone could think it would be a good idea to allow Starmer to be toppled by this, when literally nobody thinks he did anything other than make a poor call on an appointment (when he was clearly holding his nose and appointing someone who could stand up to Trump)

WTAF? I don’t think he did literally nothing? He appointed a paedophile into one of the top diplomatic roles.knowingly.

but I agree that there is no one better.

what a low bar-no one better in the Labour Party to run the country then someone who advocates for a paedophile.

Cyclebabble · 09/02/2026 17:11

If Starmer leaves then the Labour Party will inevitably move to the Left. Public services will not improve and taxes will rise. Small businesses and innovation will struggle and yet again those of us with the broadest shoulders will be asked to pay ever more. This will not end well.

Greedybilly · 09/02/2026 17:12

@DenizenOfAisleOfShamewe'll have to agree to differ on that😁
Jeez even the Daily Star ( right wing tory loving comic) took the piss out of them. Can't add much to that.

InWithPeaceOutWithStress · 09/02/2026 17:12

ThisDandyWriter · 09/02/2026 17:09

WTAF? I don’t think he did literally nothing? He appointed a paedophile into one of the top diplomatic roles.knowingly.

but I agree that there is no one better.

what a low bar-no one better in the Labour Party to run the country then someone who advocates for a paedophile.

Mandelson was a pedophile? What on earth have you been reading?! There’s no evidence at all for that.

JoyOfSpecs · 09/02/2026 17:14

ThisDandyWriter · 09/02/2026 17:09

WTAF? I don’t think he did literally nothing? He appointed a paedophile into one of the top diplomatic roles.knowingly.

but I agree that there is no one better.

what a low bar-no one better in the Labour Party to run the country then someone who advocates for a paedophile.

Peter Mandelson a paedophile?

Livingonbananabread · 09/02/2026 17:15

@ThisDandyWriter what are you talking about? No one has suggested Mandelson is a paedophile. He was friends with Epstein, accepted money from him, enjoyed the lifestyle benefits of friendship with him, and shared information with him. All appalling, but there’s been no indication he was involved sexually with anyone procured or trafficked by JE.

BeanQuisine · 09/02/2026 17:15

Yes, spinning the leadership revolving door won't improve the situation. It will just increase the chaos and undermine whatever stability has been achieved since the end of the Tory nightmare.

Those who genuinely believe that Starmer is "way out of his depth" really need to ponder the alternatives, and ask why they think they'd be any better.

Myoldbear · 09/02/2026 17:16

ThisDandyWriter · 09/02/2026 17:09

WTAF? I don’t think he did literally nothing? He appointed a paedophile into one of the top diplomatic roles.knowingly.

but I agree that there is no one better.

what a low bar-no one better in the Labour Party to run the country then someone who advocates for a paedophile.

Wow!
Rubbish!

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 09/02/2026 17:23

ThisDandyWriter · 09/02/2026 17:09

WTAF? I don’t think he did literally nothing? He appointed a paedophile into one of the top diplomatic roles.knowingly.

but I agree that there is no one better.

what a low bar-no one better in the Labour Party to run the country then someone who advocates for a paedophile.

l despair at the level of intelligence in this country.

HowDoYouSolveAProblemLikeMyRear · 09/02/2026 17:23

I'd be very glad to see his aims for assisted suicide, abortion, and home-education fall by the wayside.

But I agree that the country needs stable government and leadership, especially in an unstable world.

A PP described him as "the grown up in the room". Angels Rayner seems the exact opposite and I dread the thought of her being PM. She'd be a poor leader for the country, and would make a Reform Government almost guaranteed.

HappyFace2025 · 09/02/2026 17:24

ThisDandyWriter · 09/02/2026 17:09

WTAF? I don’t think he did literally nothing? He appointed a paedophile into one of the top diplomatic roles.knowingly.

but I agree that there is no one better.

what a low bar-no one better in the Labour Party to run the country then someone who advocates for a paedophile.

Please provide the evidence that Mandelson has been convicted as a paedophile.

HappyFace2025 · 09/02/2026 17:25

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 09/02/2026 17:23

l despair at the level of intelligence in this country.

Me too. As evidenced by many on this thread.

CrackersMalackers · 09/02/2026 17:25

ThisDandyWriter · 09/02/2026 17:09

WTAF? I don’t think he did literally nothing? He appointed a paedophile into one of the top diplomatic roles.knowingly.

but I agree that there is no one better.

what a low bar-no one better in the Labour Party to run the country then someone who advocates for a paedophile.

If I was Peter Mandelson I would be feeling quite litigious reading this.... No evidence at all he ever abused anyone underage, he is a gay man and not implicated in any if the sex trafficking of young girls.

Quite slanderous really

HappyFace2025 · 09/02/2026 17:28

ThisDandyWriter · 09/02/2026 17:09

WTAF? I don’t think he did literally nothing? He appointed a paedophile into one of the top diplomatic roles.knowingly.

but I agree that there is no one better.

what a low bar-no one better in the Labour Party to run the country then someone who advocates for a paedophile.

Reported