Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Any Americans on here? What is the feeling in America regarding trump?

394 replies

FedUpWithDilemmas · 17/01/2026 17:46

I've only seen one person talking out against him regarding Greenland. I know this can't be representative to reality. But I wonder what the media is controlling

What's going on in America?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
YourGoldSquid · 18/01/2026 08:40

lowboneslife · 18/01/2026 08:32

What do you mean, ‘what is the media controlling’. As I understand it, the MSM is overwhelmingly democrat with only Fox representing right wing views.

Immigration was a huge issue in the election so presumably a lot of Americans support what Trump is doing.

Trump ( and whoever his successor is, if the republicans put up a candidate associated with Trump) will be judged on how well he is seen to do domestically and how well his policies serve working class people and families.

Sure. Again, no argument from me.

But the press talks about this as if Trump has absolute power. He simply doesn't. I mean, I expect the SC to rule against him on tariffs. Again, this is the responsibility of the Senate, not the President.

What Trump is doing is exercising Executive authority to see how far he can push it. He does this avoid pre-emptive intervention by the courts/congress. It is just normal politics.

But if we want to be honest about where the actual problem lies, we have to look at the Senate and House. Since the 1970s they have been willing to cede authority to the Executive. They need to start taking that power back.

YourGoldSquid · 18/01/2026 08:44

MikeRafone · 18/01/2026 08:09

Trump is doing to well in Venezuela, no takers in the oil world for putting infrastructure into Venezuela for more than 1% of the oil to come out, to risky and unstable for companies to go in

You know the Brits supported this UN resolution right?

Taking out Maduro has been the policy of many western governments for a very long time. To say Trump acted crazily here just isn't true. He enforced UN policy. And again, weakened Russia.

This is a great example of the press simply lying. The Maduro policy has been the world position for years. So to suggest Trump is somehow an autocrat in this specific situation just isn't true. He's actually enforcing NATO and UN policy.

GeneralPeter · 18/01/2026 08:45

Typo above. 40% approve, 56% disapprove, per the Economist poll tracker.

VanCleefArpels · 18/01/2026 08:54

mids2019 · 18/01/2026 07:09

I really think here it is time for Denmark to step down here and seek Greenland for the sake of the greater geopolitical picture in a world where power counts. If Trump is determined to get Greenland and all the signals point that way then in reality he will get it. We in the UK are poised to suffer some economic harm as tariffs are placed on us and we have to ask for UK citizens is getting involved in this colonial power play over an arctic land mass really in our best jnterests? Surely our best interest lies in ensuring the US remains a steadfast economic and military ally by acquiesing on this issue although it is painful.

In reality we are just setting up ourselves for humiliation as Europeans by potentially watching US troops land in Greenland, bloodlesly taking the taking the Island, and have to face the fact that the US is still the backbone of western security so NATO will stand and we go back to the status quo.

Would you say the same thing if, say, the Orkneys or the Isle of Wight was found to have rare earth that the leader of a supposedly friendly nation fancies taking? Did you think that Argentina could just nick the Falkland Islands? Do you think China should just walk into Taiwan because they fancy it? I cannot fathom how you think what you have said is in any way reasonable. It’s batshit.

And it’s not just an “Arctic land mass”. It’s home to Greenlanders who have seemingly been perfectly happy being part of Denmark for generations. Do they not count?

Weefreetiffany · 18/01/2026 08:57

mids2019 · 18/01/2026 07:09

I really think here it is time for Denmark to step down here and seek Greenland for the sake of the greater geopolitical picture in a world where power counts. If Trump is determined to get Greenland and all the signals point that way then in reality he will get it. We in the UK are poised to suffer some economic harm as tariffs are placed on us and we have to ask for UK citizens is getting involved in this colonial power play over an arctic land mass really in our best jnterests? Surely our best interest lies in ensuring the US remains a steadfast economic and military ally by acquiesing on this issue although it is painful.

In reality we are just setting up ourselves for humiliation as Europeans by potentially watching US troops land in Greenland, bloodlesly taking the taking the Island, and have to face the fact that the US is still the backbone of western security so NATO will stand and we go back to the status quo.

Oh you again. Got your arse handed to you with these opinions on the other thread so you’re trying a different thread. Europe will strongly oppose any aggression to our sovereign territory by Putin’s puppet Trump. We don’t have to trade with America. We can sell our dollars and you would be worse off so start treating us like friends and allies and you won’t have any problems.

Fulmine · 18/01/2026 08:59

I wonder how much support there is in the army, whose leaders must be concerned about how thinly Trump intends to stretch them. How much appetite do they actually have to go and kill Greenlanders and their defenders? I know they have to follow orders, but could we reach a point where they simply say no and effectively take over?

Fulmine · 18/01/2026 09:01

We in the UK are poised to suffer some economic harm

Are we? Remember we've been here before, but TACO.

Weefreetiffany · 18/01/2026 09:02

Also America wouldn’t give Europe Hawai’i, so why should we give you Greenland?

this is proof, more than ever, that Putin is using Trump to destabilise western alliances and we won’t let it happen. The best thing that could happen is for Americans to impeach Trump and get someone with America’s best interests in office.

TemporarilyCantDoMyself · 18/01/2026 09:03

mids2019 · 18/01/2026 07:09

I really think here it is time for Denmark to step down here and seek Greenland for the sake of the greater geopolitical picture in a world where power counts. If Trump is determined to get Greenland and all the signals point that way then in reality he will get it. We in the UK are poised to suffer some economic harm as tariffs are placed on us and we have to ask for UK citizens is getting involved in this colonial power play over an arctic land mass really in our best jnterests? Surely our best interest lies in ensuring the US remains a steadfast economic and military ally by acquiesing on this issue although it is painful.

In reality we are just setting up ourselves for humiliation as Europeans by potentially watching US troops land in Greenland, bloodlesly taking the taking the Island, and have to face the fact that the US is still the backbone of western security so NATO will stand and we go back to the status quo.

You've written an appeasement manifesto there.
Heard of WW2? Peace in our time? Worked out well, did it? Righty-ho.

Anxietyspiral · 18/01/2026 09:04

YourGoldSquid · 18/01/2026 08:37

The media, unfortunately, presents it this way.

Checks and balances are happening. They just don't get press. And it isn't just Democrats. Republicans hold the constitution almost as a sacred text. They are loyal to this document, not the President.

Are there MAGA extremists who would follow Trump into authoritarianism? Sure. But they do not represent the majority of Americans or even conservatives.

In the States, conservatives oppose federal power all the time. The feds own most of the land in several states. This is nonsense and conservative Republicans lead the charge against the federal overreach.

So are Republicans "silent" on Trump? Yes. But this isn't surprising. Political parties like to resolve their problems internally. And many of us are lobbying Senators and congresspeople to do their jobs and introduce legislation to curb Presidential power.

A similar thing happened in 2006. Americans were not comfortable with W's power grabs. So they voted for democrats to control the House. This was a clear check on Presidential power.

For some reason, there is an impression that the US president can behave with impunity. This simply isn't true. In MN, for example, the governor controls the National Guard. And this Guard is meant to preserve State power over federal influence. So will MN guard troops be deployed to oppose federal authority? Probably. And that's the way the system is supposed to work.

Also, sorry to ramble. But another important point is that the US military is not a united force. The Army, Navy, Marines, etc. are separate entities with their own chiefs and generals. So let's say Trump somehow convinces the Army that they should become loyal to him. Do we really think the Marines, AF, and Navy would tolerate this? Absolutely not. Consolidating the support of all US armed forces would be absurdly difficult by design. Rivalry between these branches is encouraged. They are meant to oppose each other if necessary. US soldiers pledge allegiance to the constitution, not a President.

Thank you for this post as this is something I have wondered about.

So how has Trump been able to send Ice Agents to arrest citizens without the National Guard reacting? How did Venezuela happen? Surely Trump must have had to get the backing/permission from other politicians, military officials, etc? It does seem like he wakes up and acts out whatever mad plot he dreamed up the night before.

MikeRafone · 18/01/2026 09:07

YourGoldSquid · 18/01/2026 08:44

You know the Brits supported this UN resolution right?

Taking out Maduro has been the policy of many western governments for a very long time. To say Trump acted crazily here just isn't true. He enforced UN policy. And again, weakened Russia.

This is a great example of the press simply lying. The Maduro policy has been the world position for years. So to suggest Trump is somehow an autocrat in this specific situation just isn't true. He's actually enforcing NATO and UN policy.

Trump took Venezuela for oil, the rest of the excuses are faff

so now Trump has Venezuela to solve his problem for oil - how is he going to get it out?

YellowPixie · 18/01/2026 09:17

There are midterm elections this November - how is that likely to change things? If there are more Democrats in Wshington government than at present, will that constrain him a bit, which is why he's pushing hard now for the more extreme stuff?

I am not American, I do have some very close friends who live in one of the reddest states and they are both socially and economically conservative, they would never vote democrat. They do not support Trump.

YourGoldSquid · 18/01/2026 09:19

Anxietyspiral · 18/01/2026 09:04

Thank you for this post as this is something I have wondered about.

So how has Trump been able to send Ice Agents to arrest citizens without the National Guard reacting? How did Venezuela happen? Surely Trump must have had to get the backing/permission from other politicians, military officials, etc? It does seem like he wakes up and acts out whatever mad plot he dreamed up the night before.

Venezuala is consistent with UN policy. They were sending oil to Russia. So I'm not too concerned about this. Maduro sent enough opiods to kill thousands of Americans. I see this in my own city with addicts spread on the streets. I don't really worry about Venezuala.

ICE is a different story. Deploying State national guards is a significant escalation. It hasn't really been done since the Civil War. No State Governor wants to start a civil war. And this is a real risk if you have State and Fed troops shooting at each other.

But there is a lot of rumbling in the Republican party. The way this policy is being enforced is crazy. What we want is for State and Feds to work together. But Trumps antagonism has made this difficult. And to be fair, the antagonism of Walz and the mayor of Minneapolis.

What America needs is a real come to Jesus moment. We need to re-learn that we have more in common that we realize and that it is the upper class that wants to distract us by making us enemies.

If you actually look at Trump policies, they mirror Democratic policy during the Bush years. Negotiating on drug prices? Yup. Trump supports that. A ban on private equity purchase of residential properties? Democrats used to support this. But not anymore.

The flip of party policy has been interesting to watch. There is definitely a populist element that has influence in the modern GOP. Broadly, I think this is a good thing. For too long, Republicans have favored corporate interests over family interests. No longer. And as hard it is to admit, this 100% due to Trump.

Republicans are now open to gay marriage? 100% trump.

Trump has basically transformed the GOP into 2006 democrats. It is crazy.

20thCenturyFecks · 18/01/2026 09:21

logicisall · 17/01/2026 22:32

About 17% of Americans approve of the U.S. efforts to acquire Greenland in the context of current political debate — according to a 2026 Reuters/Ipsos national poll.

A CNN/SSRS poll found about 25% of Americans favor the U.S. attempting to take control of Greenland

Older polls (from 2025) showed somewhat higher support — around 28–31% in favor of seeking ownership of Greenland

I think that Brits living in the US are less likely to be Trump supporters, so it will be interesting to hear from Americans who continue support him today.

Those percentages are scary!

Barleycat · 18/01/2026 09:23

mids2019 · 18/01/2026 07:09

I really think here it is time for Denmark to step down here and seek Greenland for the sake of the greater geopolitical picture in a world where power counts. If Trump is determined to get Greenland and all the signals point that way then in reality he will get it. We in the UK are poised to suffer some economic harm as tariffs are placed on us and we have to ask for UK citizens is getting involved in this colonial power play over an arctic land mass really in our best jnterests? Surely our best interest lies in ensuring the US remains a steadfast economic and military ally by acquiesing on this issue although it is painful.

In reality we are just setting up ourselves for humiliation as Europeans by potentially watching US troops land in Greenland, bloodlesly taking the taking the Island, and have to face the fact that the US is still the backbone of western security so NATO will stand and we go back to the status quo.

Yeah just give the fascist dictator what he wants cos thats worked so well in the past. Ffs. The man is a threat to all of us and anyone who cant see that is an idiot.

YourGoldSquid · 18/01/2026 09:24

YellowPixie · 18/01/2026 09:17

There are midterm elections this November - how is that likely to change things? If there are more Democrats in Wshington government than at present, will that constrain him a bit, which is why he's pushing hard now for the more extreme stuff?

I am not American, I do have some very close friends who live in one of the reddest states and they are both socially and economically conservative, they would never vote democrat. They do not support Trump.

If Democrats win the House, Trump is a lame duck. He can't do anything. None of his legislation will pass and the Democrats (stupidly) will try another impeachment.

The President's party usually loses House seats in midterms. It isn't realistic to expect the Senate to switch to Dem control. But the House is another matter. Repubs have a very very slim majority.

My expectation is that Americans will vote for Democrats to check Trump's executive authority. I would honestly be suprised in dems don't control the House come January. Regular Americans don't like how these policies are being enforced. And for Noem to suggest that Americans should be prepared to show citizenship papers? She needs to be impeached and removed. Most Americans do agree with this. Even if they may support the underlying policy of enforcing immigration law.

Teanbiscuits33 · 18/01/2026 09:25

YellowPixie · 18/01/2026 09:17

There are midterm elections this November - how is that likely to change things? If there are more Democrats in Wshington government than at present, will that constrain him a bit, which is why he's pushing hard now for the more extreme stuff?

I am not American, I do have some very close friends who live in one of the reddest states and they are both socially and economically conservative, they would never vote democrat. They do not support Trump.

Trump doesn’t actually want the midterms to go ahead, he floated the idea of cancelling them and then said something along the lines of ‘’but I won’t suggest it because the fake news will call me a dictator’’. It’s clearly something he’s considered!

Dragonasaurus · 18/01/2026 09:25

YourGoldSquid · 18/01/2026 07:54

This an example of sensible policy approached in the most absurd way.

US control of Greenland isn't a new idea. American military presence would be a huge problem of Russian and China. Also, the world runs on rare earth minerals. Would we rather these be controlled by Russia and China or the Americans? All we hear these days is how Russia wants to invade Europe. US sovereignty over Greenland would significantly diminish their world power.

Greenland becoming part of the US isn't a crazy idea. It has almost happened before. We've purchased Alaska and Louisiana. This stuff happens all the time.

Trump is a moron his approach to this. We've bought territory before. And I'm confident that if we negotiated in good faith, made certain promises to Greenland, etc, we could make it a good deal for all involved.

But to impose tariffs and invoke the military? Absolute nonsense.

Yeah, looking at how the US is treating its citizens inMinnesota, the Greenlandic people would surely find the offer irresistible 🙄

Trump is demonstrating over and over again that he is no ally to Europe (or Canada). So why is the US taking `Greenland better than Russia or China?

VanCleefArpels · 18/01/2026 09:26

Fulmine · 18/01/2026 08:59

I wonder how much support there is in the army, whose leaders must be concerned about how thinly Trump intends to stretch them. How much appetite do they actually have to go and kill Greenlanders and their defenders? I know they have to follow orders, but could we reach a point where they simply say no and effectively take over?

They only have to follow LAWFUL orders. There’s some chats in military circles that the taking out of civilian boats off Venezuela was stretching the law to its extremes, yet the top brass was clearly happy to comply with orders. Will be very interesting to see how far that goes but I don’t hold out any hope.

2021x · 18/01/2026 09:29

I have swapped the News for Netflix fo the moment. So much bullshit comes out of Trumps mouth that its just easier to pay attention to what he is actually doing, rather than what he says he is going to do. The appointment of Mark Carney and Tony Blair may look interesting but I am more interested if it actually has any teeth.

I would imagine the Republicans will get very tired with the instability that the Trump administration and are already making plans to roll him, but the question is will he actually go?

YourGoldSquid · 18/01/2026 09:31

Barleycat · 18/01/2026 09:23

Yeah just give the fascist dictator what he wants cos thats worked so well in the past. Ffs. The man is a threat to all of us and anyone who cant see that is an idiot.

Sure. But he's gone in 2 years. And Americans usually float back and forth. I fully expect a democrat President come 2029.

The press likes to scare people implying that Trump has more power than he actually has. He can't cancel elections. He can't send the army against US citizens.

I fully understand that we look crazy to Europeans, but this is why we own guns. If the feds want State authority, they will need to fight for it. And yes, there is that trope that "350 million semi-auto pistols and riles can oppose the US military." I think American and British troops who served in Iraq would agree that a bunch of shitty AK-47s and IEDs can be a real problem when trying to capture territory.

In the end, this is all your fault. :). We embrace the John Lockian right of revolution. And our philosophy is that the government won't be afraid of citizens unless they are armed. Again, I know this sounds nuts. But is is the American ethos.

This is why Trump will ultimately fail. Tyrants fall and individual Americans are pretty sensitive about the exercise of federal power.

VanCleefArpels · 18/01/2026 09:31

@YourGoldSquid so are we to believe that despite “opportunity” China and Russia have only just become a threat to Greenland (and therefore USA) since Trump became POTUS? Don’t be silly.

Teanbiscuits33 · 18/01/2026 09:31

Even if the mid terms went ahead, I wouldn’t be very confident there would be no interference. Musk has said he helped him win the presidency, and I’d bet my life Russia had something to do with it also. They are colluding together after all.

YourGoldSquid · 18/01/2026 09:33

VanCleefArpels · 18/01/2026 09:31

@YourGoldSquid so are we to believe that despite “opportunity” China and Russia have only just become a threat to Greenland (and therefore USA) since Trump became POTUS? Don’t be silly.

Of course not.

But we need to think 50 years out. If we really think Russia is a threat to Europe, we should neutralize their influence. Greenland (whether American or not) will play a huge role in this.

It isn't crazy to think about this as a potential opportunity for NATO and the US. But the way it is being done is absurd and embarrassing.

20thCenturyFecks · 18/01/2026 09:33

mids2019 · 18/01/2026 07:46

I agree Trump is a bit of a dick but he is not hitler. This is about narcissism and mineral rights.

I just feel if Trump is determined to get Greenland should this be a hill we did on in support of Denmark and it's sovreignty of an arctic territory where historically the native people have not been treated well. (I don't remember swarms of European nations coming to our aid during the Falkands war as well.)

we are too intertwined with the U.S. to make support of the Danes a priority and as a sovereign state is it up to the Danes to defend their territory? Maybe it is time for the Danes to make the deal because what other alternative is there?

The Falklands? Good grief.

These alternative pov are disturbingly mind boggling.