Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Reform to scrap human rights, surely people won't vote for that

180 replies

FarFutures · 08/09/2025 17:46

Putting the immigration issues to one side for a moment, as I believe all parties are trying to come up with ways of addressing it.
Here’s what Reform UK’s own policy documents and recent reporting reveal about their stance on the Equality Act:
Reform UK’s Position on the Equality Act
According to Reform UK’s 2024 “Contract” (their equivalent of a manifesto):

  • They intend to scrap the Equality Act 2010 entirely.
  • They specifically criticize it for enforcing "positive action" and claim it has lowered standards and reduced economic productivity.
  • They also vow to eliminate Diversity, Equality and Inclusion (DE&I) rules.
  • Furthermore, Reform proposes to leave the European Convention on Human Rights and introduce a new British Bill of Rights.
Other legal commentary confirms the vagueness of their pledge: they want to replace the Equality Act but provide no details on what, if anything, would take its place. What This Means Reform UK’s Pledge Implications Scrap Equality Act 2010 Dismantling legal protections against discrimination based on characteristics like gender, race, disability, religion, sex, and age. End DE&I rules Remove institutional policies aimed at promoting workplace inclusivity and protecting historically marginalized groups. No official replacement proposed Creates legal uncertainty and could leave many without recourse against discrimination. What Others Are Saying On discussion forums like the National Autistic Society’s community board, Reform’s deputy leader Richard Tice has been quoted saying: “We must fire all these EDI woke jobs and scrap the 2010 Equality Act which is so damaging to growth and productivity.” Bottom Line Reform UK is explicitly planning to scrap the Equality Act. Their publicly declared platform not only advocates repealing it, but also cutting tied-in equality measures like DE&I frameworks—with no clear replacement. This represents a radical restructuring of the UK’s equalities legal framework.

Is this not a reason not to vote Reform, if you have any disabled family members, or care about equality and human rights in general, it's terrifying to me.
How is this not talked about more.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
LarkspurLane · 09/09/2025 08:15

piscofrisco · 09/09/2025 07:41

They will. Because they have been sold the idea that the Human Rights are what enables immigrants to come and remain in this country. They don’t understand that that’s not correct and in fact they will be a bit screwed without Human Rights that also apply to them.

This sums it all up exactly in a concise post.

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 09/09/2025 08:21

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 09/09/2025 08:08

The ECHR is not perfect by any means, but it was debated and drafted over a long period of time by some of the brightest and best minds from each of the founding member states.

Can it be improved upon? Yes, certainly.

By whatever Farage and his thick acolytes scribble on the back of a fag packet? Certainly not.

We are all far better protected by having the rights enshrined in the ECHR, which includes your right to life and freedom from torture and inhumane treatment, your right to a fair trial, your right to freedom of belief and expression, and your right to a private and family life, than we would be if we could deport a few more foreign criminals.

I have no doubt that Farage and Co would bring back the death penalty as a matter of priority, and I have absolutely no desire to see the UK become the shame of Europe with a justice system as fucked up as the Americans.mp

Edited

Why do you have no doubt he would bring back the death penalty, it seems a form no from Farage when asked this specific question.

The right to a fair trial stands as a fundamental aspect of the rule of law and getting rid of the ECHR would not affect that right

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://youtu.be/N5WZzC0Jd58?si=fcZRwcYa_PU5jl5q

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 09/09/2025 08:23

Newjobnewclothes · 08/09/2025 22:25

Yes of course they'll vote for it.

The level of political education and understanding is low among many people in society and so many are easy to manipulate by people like Farage.

My Brexit-voting town's Facebook group is full of people parroting racist rhetoric about boats and immigrants and sounding like fucking fascists in training, then having the audacity to post things like "this isn't what my grandfather fought for, he'd be turning in his grave.

They seriously think WW2 was about keeping foreigners out, not fighting fascism.

WW2 was largely fought to protect our way of life. Some people try ink our way of life is under threat now.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 09/09/2025 08:41

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 09/09/2025 08:21

Why do you have no doubt he would bring back the death penalty, it seems a form no from Farage when asked this specific question.

The right to a fair trial stands as a fundamental aspect of the rule of law and getting rid of the ECHR would not affect that right

You believe what Farage says?

Wow.

Bringing back the death penalty is a very popular policy among his knuckle dragging supporters.

🤣

ThatWaryOchreQuoter · 09/09/2025 08:50

LarkspurLane · 09/09/2025 08:15

This sums it all up exactly in a concise post.

Articles 8 and 3 definitely do this, which they quite obviously weren’t designed to do. Article 2 didn’t help plurality of education and protect children from the education tax, which it was designed to do. There’s a lot of arguments for replacing ECHR with something that works or re-looking at the existing articles. Phrases like ‘Scrapping human rights’ show a contempt for the intelligence of the electorate.

twistyizzy · 09/09/2025 09:09

ThatWaryOchreQuoter · 09/09/2025 08:50

Articles 8 and 3 definitely do this, which they quite obviously weren’t designed to do. Article 2 didn’t help plurality of education and protect children from the education tax, which it was designed to do. There’s a lot of arguments for replacing ECHR with something that works or re-looking at the existing articles. Phrases like ‘Scrapping human rights’ show a contempt for the intelligence of the electorate.

Exactly!
The courts found that the Education Tax DOES interfere with APT1 and Art 14 of HR Act and DOES discriminate but it's fine so 🤷‍♀️ If the HR act can't protect us from our government then it needs reforming.

Reform to scrap human rights, surely people won't vote for that
ThatWaryOchreQuoter · 09/09/2025 09:21

twistyizzy · 09/09/2025 09:09

Exactly!
The courts found that the Education Tax DOES interfere with APT1 and Art 14 of HR Act and DOES discriminate but it's fine so 🤷‍♀️ If the HR act can't protect us from our government then it needs reforming.

It amazes me that people don’t think any deeper than ‘scrapping our human rights’ and see how it’s actually failing. It’s not blaspheming to suggest there can be alternative. It came into affect in 1953, it’s 72 years old! The world population was 2.5 billion then and it’s now over 8 billion with mass migration seen on scale that couldn’t have been imagined back then. It simply doesn’t reflect the way the modern world is and that’s before we get into the subject of the massive growth of the malign influence of human rights lawyers.

twistyizzy · 09/09/2025 09:23

ThatWaryOchreQuoter · 09/09/2025 09:21

It amazes me that people don’t think any deeper than ‘scrapping our human rights’ and see how it’s actually failing. It’s not blaspheming to suggest there can be alternative. It came into affect in 1953, it’s 72 years old! The world population was 2.5 billion then and it’s now over 8 billion with mass migration seen on scale that couldn’t have been imagined back then. It simply doesn’t reflect the way the modern world is and that’s before we get into the subject of the massive growth of the malign influence of human rights lawyers.

Yes. We are in a situation whereby HR prevents us deporting people and taking action against some criminals but allows the taxing of children's education. Fucking madness!

Whoatethelastchocolate · 09/09/2025 09:33

Here we go again..privileged people complaining about independent schools no longer having protections with regard to tax. I am sure that is at the top of everyone's list when it comes to the problems this country faces at the moment.

Absentosaur · 09/09/2025 09:35

Whoatethelastchocolate · 09/09/2025 09:33

Here we go again..privileged people complaining about independent schools no longer having protections with regard to tax. I am sure that is at the top of everyone's list when it comes to the problems this country faces at the moment.

Tax on children’s education. VAT on education. Of course you understand the implications of this for the future. I won’t patronise you by outlining them.

ThatWaryOchreQuoter · 09/09/2025 09:37

Whoatethelastchocolate · 09/09/2025 09:33

Here we go again..privileged people complaining about independent schools no longer having protections with regard to tax. I am sure that is at the top of everyone's list when it comes to the problems this country faces at the moment.

It’s a thread about ECHR. Article 2 is supposed to protect education choice. It didn’t. This is a relevant and recent example of a basic human right (including yours and you children) being eroded due to the ECHR not being fit for purpose.

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 09/09/2025 09:38

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 09/09/2025 08:41

You believe what Farage says?

Wow.

Bringing back the death penalty is a very popular policy among his knuckle dragging supporters.

🤣

Oh dear! So now we have evidence of what Farage thinks, you resort to derogatory language about the wide variety of supporters.

im afraid, once you resort to that level of comment it is clear you actually have no argument beyond, “I don’t like it and hate everyone who thinks differently to me”. Come back when you have a coherent argument based on evidence or at least a well argued philosophical position.

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 09/09/2025 09:48

So we have a 72 year plus old document which sets out rights designed to protect people two generations ago? Coming out the Second World War. The world has changed since then.

This is the problem with positive right. A bit like the US constitution giving people the right to carry arms. At the time that was enacted there is no way that they could have envisaged the society now, the types of weapons available. People with bad intent lean on that right and it causes a lot of problems, legislation should be fit for purpose, having to align to a Treaty drafted for an entirely different world causes issues. Human Rights legislation needs to be reviewed to ensure it is fit for purpose in the current climate? Like all laws HR legislation should move and react to the society it’s trying to govern

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 09/09/2025 10:03

MyHeartyCoralSnail · 09/09/2025 09:38

Oh dear! So now we have evidence of what Farage thinks, you resort to derogatory language about the wide variety of supporters.

im afraid, once you resort to that level of comment it is clear you actually have no argument beyond, “I don’t like it and hate everyone who thinks differently to me”. Come back when you have a coherent argument based on evidence or at least a well argued philosophical position.

People who think Farage is the answer to any problem aren't worth debating with.

dottiehens · 09/09/2025 10:14

As like with Brexit I won’t vote for Reform. However, plenty of people would for sure. Unfortunately, the rights have been abused over and over. We literally are inundated with criminals and low levels of educated immigration that brought their culture with them. It does not look good. Some truly had enough some of us are leaving. Not matter how many threads discussing Farage and the perils of Reform. it is futile.

twistyizzy · 09/09/2025 10:17

Whoatethelastchocolate · 09/09/2025 09:33

Here we go again..privileged people complaining about independent schools no longer having protections with regard to tax. I am sure that is at the top of everyone's list when it comes to the problems this country faces at the moment.

ODFOD

This is a thread about HR + ECHR. Labour breached both of those with the Education Tax. So it's a completely pertinent and relevant contribution and illustrates that in its current form it isn't fit for purpose!

NorfolkandBad · 09/09/2025 10:20

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 09/09/2025 10:03

People who think Farage is the answer to any problem aren't worth debating with.

That's a great argument - you've convinced me now.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 09/09/2025 10:26

NorfolkandBad · 09/09/2025 10:20

That's a great argument - you've convinced me now.

It's not an argument at all.

Playing chess with a pigeon would be a better use of my time.

ThatWaryOchreQuoter · 09/09/2025 10:32

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 09/09/2025 10:26

It's not an argument at all.

Playing chess with a pigeon would be a better use of my time.

It's not an argument at all.

EasternStandard · 09/09/2025 10:37

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 09/09/2025 10:26

It's not an argument at all.

Playing chess with a pigeon would be a better use of my time.

You’re right there’s no cogent argument. There also seems to be a tendency for some who vote for Labour / left just to insult over much else.

joanofaardvark · 09/09/2025 10:44

So how would Farage and his party (private limited company) improve life for the c.70 million citizens of the UK?

ThatWaryOchreQuoter · 09/09/2025 10:56

joanofaardvark · 09/09/2025 10:44

So how would Farage and his party (private limited company) improve life for the c.70 million citizens of the UK?

Control immigration
Reduce ballooning benefit bill
Reduce fiscal drag from income tax rate freezing
Get rid of discriminatory employment practices
Stop attempting to stifle free speech

BabyBadaBing · 09/09/2025 10:59

If you had said that Trump would be elected president 20 years ago you would have been laughed out of the room - and then say he gets convicted and then REelected.... you'd be committed!

sashh · 09/09/2025 11:08

OP Gender is not a 'protected characteristic' under the Equality Act.

People voted for Brexit 'To stop foreigners coming here' and no further thought.

Never underestimate how stupid some people are.

FarFutures · 09/09/2025 11:25

ThatWaryOchreQuoter · 09/09/2025 09:21

It amazes me that people don’t think any deeper than ‘scrapping our human rights’ and see how it’s actually failing. It’s not blaspheming to suggest there can be alternative. It came into affect in 1953, it’s 72 years old! The world population was 2.5 billion then and it’s now over 8 billion with mass migration seen on scale that couldn’t have been imagined back then. It simply doesn’t reflect the way the modern world is and that’s before we get into the subject of the massive growth of the malign influence of human rights lawyers.

We really need to know what the alternative under Reform would look like, preferably before a general election

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread