Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Reform party

1000 replies

TalkToTheHand123 · 18/04/2025 20:36

Will Reform win any votes at the local elections?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
32
Maitri108 · 22/04/2025 16:27

JasmineAllen · 22/04/2025 16:19

What I said was quite often, but not always it's the left doing the mocking. You can check my post above 🙂

This is my experience, probably because most of the news/entertainment I watch comes from a centre left place because my politics are centre left.

It's a discussion thread. I don't need to directly engage with the OP because I was engaging with one of the other posters and my comments were directed at them 😁

I read widely and am also on social media. I don't see the left mocking the Reform quite so blatantly. If we look at the States, I don't remember the mocking being two way.

You don't need to engage with anyone, nor does anyone else. I didn't say you did, I suggested that you put your money where your mouth is.

boys3 · 22/04/2025 16:52

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/apr/22/extinction-level-event-tories-fear-voters-turning-reform-lincolnshire

interesting article from the Graun

The last Electoral Calculus had Cons holding on in Lincs as largest party. Currently 53 / 70 seats Con, 6 independents, 4 Labour, 3 Lib Dem, 3 Reform, 1 vacant. It looks like the 3 Reform cllrs were all elected standing for other parties and have defected. Mayoral election also for Greater Lincolnshire, seemingly a three way fight - Con Lab & Reform, though six candidates in total.

Lincs does have a Reform MP for Boston and Skeg already. Though it looks like all the Council wards covered by the constituency are currently Cons and one independent.

‘Extinction-level event’: Tories fear voters turning to Reform in Lincolnshire

Conservatives face tough fight in mayoral and council elections as Farage’s anti-net zero message cuts through

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/apr/22/extinction-level-event-tories-fear-voters-turning-reform-lincolnshire

JasmineAllen · 22/04/2025 17:00

Maitri108 · 22/04/2025 16:27

I read widely and am also on social media. I don't see the left mocking the Reform quite so blatantly. If we look at the States, I don't remember the mocking being two way.

You don't need to engage with anyone, nor does anyone else. I didn't say you did, I suggested that you put your money where your mouth is.

But I'm not just talking about the states. If you look at my original post (the point of which was not to write off Reform so quickly because I think that's naive),I referred back to the 1980s Uk as well as Italy, the modern day uk and the US.

I genuinely don't understand why you're getting your knickers in a twist about my posts and being so weird because it sounds like neither of us hold Reform in high regard.

Maitri108 · 22/04/2025 17:11

JasmineAllen · 22/04/2025 17:00

But I'm not just talking about the states. If you look at my original post (the point of which was not to write off Reform so quickly because I think that's naive),I referred back to the 1980s Uk as well as Italy, the modern day uk and the US.

I genuinely don't understand why you're getting your knickers in a twist about my posts and being so weird because it sounds like neither of us hold Reform in high regard.

I'm not getting my knickers in a twist. I'm not just talking about the States. I was responding to your assertion that it's predominantly the left mocking the right. I disagreed with you and gave you the reason why I disagreed.

How am I being 'weird'? You said that people shouldn't dismiss Reform and should engage with them. I suggested that you do exactly that and you refused.

Oasister · 22/04/2025 19:11

TheNuthatch · 21/04/2025 22:59

Wet myself in anticipation? WTF
You clearly didn't understand the context of what was being discussed in those particular comments. No need to be nasty. I'm also not a Reform supporter!

Oh FFS drop the faux pearl clutching. It's just a figure of speech.

Clavinova · 22/04/2025 20:23

StandFirm · 21/04/2025 13:51

Brexit is literally responsible for making childhood cancers less affordable to treat. Slow clap for brexit fanatics.

Not forgetting these complaints in 2014 and 2017:

Feb 2014
Children with cancer being denied life-saving drugs, scientists say.
"We believe the EU regulatory system is badly out of date and has not kept up with modern conceptions in cancer research,"^
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/feb/10/children-cancer-denied-life-saving-drugs-eu-regulations

March 2017
Children and young people are being denied the latest cancer treatments by outdated European regulations.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/mar/14/close-cancer-loophole-now-to-save-childrens-lives

StandFirm · 22/04/2025 20:47

But 11 and 8 years on respectively, the cost of accessing cancer drugs has quadrupled! We have more red tape, not less, to contend with.

Clavinova · 22/04/2025 21:05

TopPocketFind · 21/04/2025 12:32

More research here

https://www.durham.ac.uk/departments/academic/law/news-and-events/news/2023/february/new-report-on-small-boat-crossings-launched-by-professor-thom-brooks/

This week Professor Thom Brooks, Professor of Law and Government, launched the most comprehensive report into the issue of asylum seekers using small boats to cross the Channel to Britain. A key finding of the 55 page report is that the Government's Brexit deal is a primary factor.

No small boat arrivals are recorded prior to 2018 when the UK was a part of a returns arrangement with the EU whereby anyone making the crossing could be returned. But the Government's Brexit deal did not include any agreement on a new returns arrangement and so returning migrants became far more difficult - and small boat crossings grew quickly. Other findings of the report are that the Government requires a new returns arrangement if it wants to make substantial progress in reducing numbers. The report calls on the Government to announce an independent investigation into missing children awaiting asylum decisions, provides evidence from the Home Office that it does not expect the Government's plans to work, that small boats are not the cause of the growing asylum application backlog and the plans for sending asylum seekers to Rwanda to have applications decided there lacks evidence of any deterrent effect or value for money.

Professor Brooks has written his report as though we left the Dublin Regulation on 31 January 2020 (”UK’s failure to retain or create a new returns agreement with the EU after 31 January 2020”) – however we did not exit the Dublin Agreement until the end of 2020 (31 December 2020). Indeed, the Home Office submitted more returns requests under the Dublin Agreement in 2020 (over 8,000 requests - but resulting in only 100 returns) than it did in 2019 (Professor Brooks only gives figures for 2019).

He links regulatory changes in 2020 to the rise of small boat arrivals in 2020 (8,466) - however the regulatory changes he refers to did not occur until January 2021. He also notes that the ”biggest dip in non-small boat irregular migration happens in 2020” - particularly by air - but he hasn’t considered that Covid restrictions are the probable cause of the dip. The Brexit transition year and Covid seem to have passed him by – or perhaps he is trying to bend the facts to his conclusion.

In addition, Professor Brooks claimed in June 2016 that, 'if anyone sets foot first in Greece or Italy [where the majority of asylum seekers were arriving] and makes a claim for asylum in Britain later they can be returned to that country'

His reference to Greece in particular was substantially incorrect at the time, as the UK had not sent any Dublin returns to Greece after 2010 – following an ECJ ruling in 2011 which the UK and Irish governments lost - and after the EU had suspended all Dublin returns to Greece. There was a partial resumption by some member states in 2017 - but not by the UK, since conditions in the refugee camps in Greece had not materially improved and the Home Office was still open to legal challenge on any returns.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-16285573

TopPocketFind · 22/04/2025 21:09

Do you have an explanation why the boat crossings increased in 2018 @Clavinova ?

Clavinova · 22/04/2025 21:13

StandFirm · 22/04/2025 20:47

But 11 and 8 years on respectively, the cost of accessing cancer drugs has quadrupled! We have more red tape, not less, to contend with.

I doubt it (or not solely the result of Brexit) - perhaps in extreme examples of one or two trials.

Lonelycrab · 22/04/2025 21:20

StandFirm · 22/04/2025 20:47

But 11 and 8 years on respectively, the cost of accessing cancer drugs has quadrupled! We have more red tape, not less, to contend with.

Well exactly.

And besides, Farage is so in awe of the American way of doing things, and wishes to bring that to the U.K.

Many of us will simply be unable to afford this, and the NHS will simply become carved up into different profit making enterprises.

Any reasonable person will understand the implications with how that’s going to make healthcare far far more expensive, probably impossible for many or most of us.

Just like the US, and that’s what reform want despite all the mealy mouthed, poorly conceived ideas Farage claims.

dubsie · 22/04/2025 21:22

Stop the discussion on immigration and let's start a conversation with reform about workers rights and the NHS. Let's hear the truth about there plans because I will bet hardly any of them will like what reform stand for.

The boat crossings are just noise to get votes but once they are in expect a ruthless regime for working classes especially those on crap money.

Why the conservatives and Labour get sucked into the Farage rabbit hole is beyond me....I'd be asking him what are his plans for workers rights....let's hear it Farage. Let's hear the truth. Let's hear about your Insurance based health care system.... according to Farage it will be no more than a Netflix subscription.... please tell us who is underwriting that insurance because you won't find a single insurance company out there that will offer the same cover as the NHS for ten pounds a month.

The guy is a liar and he needs calling out for it... anyone on here who votes for Farage you are an absolute idiot because the guy is a liar and you are falling for it.

Clavinova · 22/04/2025 21:24

TopPocketFind · 22/04/2025 21:09

Do you have an explanation why the boat crossings increased in 2018 @Clavinova ?

Several suggestions:

September 2016
Construction of a UK-funded wall near Calais' so-called Jungle migrant camp will begin soon, the Home Office says.
Dubbed the "Great Wall of Calais", external by some media, the 4m (13ft) wall will run for 1km (0.6 miles) along both sides of the main road to Calais port.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37294187

Increasing fines for lorry drivers caught carrying migrants (even unwittingly) -

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/record-fines-for-lorry-drivers-carrying-calais-migrants-pmjnxzwcw

Maitri108 · 22/04/2025 21:32

@dubsie

The guy is a liar and he needs calling out for it... anyone on here who votes for Farage you are an absolute idiot because the guy is a liar and you are falling for it.

We're not allowed to call him out because it will make voters want to vote for him more. We're supposed to talk endlessly about "small boats" while Rome burns.

TopPocketFind · 22/04/2025 21:51

No Reform policies have been mantioned on this thread, it's all about the 'small boats'

TalkToTheHand123 · 22/04/2025 22:58

TopPocketFind · 22/04/2025 21:51

No Reform policies have been mantioned on this thread, it's all about the 'small boats'

Do you not mean no other policies?, as the small boats is a Reform policy on immigration.

They would scrap net zero and re-nationalise a few bits and bobs, so some more top notch policies to make Britain great again.

I'd say anger should be more towards Labour and Conservstive incompetence rather than to be directed and Reform.

OP posts:
TopPocketFind · 22/04/2025 23:16

They are using the 'Reform will fix it' slogan, very jimmy saville, if you choose to believe them.

Any details about those top notch policies and how they will be funded?

Lonelycrab · 22/04/2025 23:19

make Britain great again

TopPocketFind · 22/04/2025 23:22

They can get MBGA caps printed in China......

Lonelycrab · 22/04/2025 23:24

As I said previously:

Joker is this one.

Lonelycrab · 22/04/2025 23:35

re-nationalise a few bits and bobs

Which bits and bobs would they be?

TalkToTheHand123 · 22/04/2025 23:52

Lonelycrab · 22/04/2025 23:35

re-nationalise a few bits and bobs

Which bits and bobs would they be?

Steel, gas and electric, maybe a bit of coal for the craic.

OP posts:
Lonelycrab · 22/04/2025 23:53

TalkToTheHand123 · 22/04/2025 23:52

Steel, gas and electric, maybe a bit of coal for the craic.

Edited

Fracking too Shirley!!!!! Do keep up

TalkToTheHand123 · 22/04/2025 23:53

TopPocketFind · 22/04/2025 23:16

They are using the 'Reform will fix it' slogan, very jimmy saville, if you choose to believe them.

Any details about those top notch policies and how they will be funded?

Funded by money saved on the boats.

OP posts:
Lonelycrab · 22/04/2025 23:55

TalkToTheHand123 · 22/04/2025 23:53

Funded by money saved on the boats.

Sod this for a game of soldiers

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.