Thank you for engaging on a point of policy rather than the usual hyperbolic dross seen on these threads.
I’m going to assume the policy you present in such negative terms is the plan to replace the equalities act. Next to that aim, in the ‘contract’ it is explained that they want to stop positive discrimination on the basis that it is best for the economy if people are hired based on ability and merit, not quotas.
Bluntly, I don’t see a problem with that. Eg I want my doctors to be the best, not selected for their skin colour or other protected characteristic.
Now, perhaps they want to make other changes to it as well - but a spot of googling has not revealed a stated desire to scrap “women’s rights, and protections for gay people, disabled people and ethnic minorities”. In fact various of the contract promises are clear that women’s rights are to be protected far more than the other parties (excluding the shitshow that is the Tories) could even countenance.
I would be very interested to read statements, by farage and reform - not ‘interpretations’ by others - as to what else they would change on the equalities act. If you have any links, please do share.
Unfortunately, most commentators on this site prefer to say ‘go and google it’ - which I note I have done. Often it turns out that they are not basing their opinions on fact, but are instead simply repeating a position that someone fed to them. They then try to hide that lack of foundation by calling anyone who doesn’t fall in line with them a racist, bigot or other names. Which is of course tedious and fails to move the debate on in any meaningful or useful way.
My points stand. If the policies are bad and the intentions poor, they can be defeated via debate. But to have that debate, the other ‘side’ has to engage properly, rather than acting in an arrogant and supercilious manner towards those they clearly see as inferior in many ways.