Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Or have Labour totally lost the plot wrt women’s rights?

451 replies

Lion400 · 13/03/2024 15:28

Does Starmer really underestimate women this much??

‘Would you vote for a party that promised to let men parade around bollock-naked in women’s changing rooms?

Or a party that was alarmingly blasé about gay kids being ‘corrected’ with drugs and surgery?

Or a party that threatened to clamp down on thoughtcriminals who refer to people with penises and testicles – you know, men – as men?

If not, then don’t vote Labour in the upcoming General Election. Because it’s possible it will pursue all of these petty tyrannical policies’

https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/03/13/tyranny-in-drag/

Tyranny in drag

It is high time we dismantled the phoney progressive rhetoric of the woke agenda.

https://www.spiked-online.com/2024/03/13/tyranny-in-drag/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
25
Lion400 · 14/03/2024 09:06

SiobhanSharpe · 13/03/2024 15:58

I'm hoping to be able to vote for the SDP if they put up a candidate in my constituency. It doesn't seem to have been infected by the gender cult.
The 19th century American Feminist Susan B Anthony said 'No self respecting woman should wish or work for the success of a party that ignores her sex. '
As true today as it was then.

Quite. I’d never heard that quote. It really is as true today as it was then. Who would have thought we would need to be fighting for this so many years later. They knew how to use the word ‘sex’ in those days, rather than ‘gender’.

Or have Labour totally lost the plot wrt women’s rights?
OP posts:
ATerrorofLeftovers · 14/03/2024 09:08

AdamRyan · 14/03/2024 08:50

It's not necessarily GC women but the debate is emboldening far right homophobes who love a bit of violence.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/mar/25/whats-behind-the-terrifying-backlash-against-australias-queer-community

https://honisoit.com/2023/03/queer-rights-protesters-attacked-by-far-right-hate-group/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/28/anti-trans-video-los-angeles-protest-wi-spa

There is also violence against GC women too, obviously.

Male violence is the problem, but that male violence is being directed at activists from both sides and its not right to claim the GC side are the only victims.

No, the situation is not equivalent, no matter how much you might like it to be.

GC women are not perpetrators of violence and are not aggressively making threats to denounce people and take away their livelihoods. Any far right or homophobic groups are not in any way associated with GC women.

There are trans rights activists who are being violent and pursuing an aggressive agenda to intimidate and silence women so they shut up and let their rights be taken away, though.

EasternStandard · 14/03/2024 09:10

Lion400 · 14/03/2024 09:06

Quite. I’d never heard that quote. It really is as true today as it was then. Who would have thought we would need to be fighting for this so many years later. They knew how to use the word ‘sex’ in those days, rather than ‘gender’.

Edited

It’s odd to me that posters mock / belittle or attack women speaking up but it really is worth it. For me and my dd, but also all children given where the ideology has taken us with harm.

Tg on the puberty blocker decision, it takes a lot but each small step is something

I think only a few countries Denmark and so on have done the same

Timing this around is not easy, but worth it

EasternStandard · 14/03/2024 09:11

ATerrorofLeftovers · 14/03/2024 09:08

No, the situation is not equivalent, no matter how much you might like it to be.

GC women are not perpetrators of violence and are not aggressively making threats to denounce people and take away their livelihoods. Any far right or homophobic groups are not in any way associated with GC women.

There are trans rights activists who are being violent and pursuing an aggressive agenda to intimidate and silence women so they shut up and let their rights be taken away, though.

Yes to this

Lion400 · 14/03/2024 09:11

ATerrorofLeftovers · 14/03/2024 09:08

No, the situation is not equivalent, no matter how much you might like it to be.

GC women are not perpetrators of violence and are not aggressively making threats to denounce people and take away their livelihoods. Any far right or homophobic groups are not in any way associated with GC women.

There are trans rights activists who are being violent and pursuing an aggressive agenda to intimidate and silence women so they shut up and let their rights be taken away, though.

Absolutely. Everyone knows this it’s just some don’t like to admit it, it doesn’t suit the narrative. That or cognitive dissonance. Or misogyny. Or a mixture of all of the above.

‘Male violence is the problem’

OP posts:
Grapesarenottheonlyfruit · 14/03/2024 09:12

Let’s be honest. No one is going to change the way they vote because of comments on here. They must think we’re stupid if they think they can influence posters to that extent. Most people don’t agree 100% with the policies of the party they vote for but they are pragmatic and can see the bigger picture. I have issues with gender ideology but also recognise that the Tory stance isn’t coming from a position of integrity, it’s just blatant vote chasing. Look at the wider picture aka policies in action/record and they don’t give a jot about most women, particularly poor ones.
Anyway cannot be bothered to give this thread any more attention.
That the OP posted a thread like this days after the misogynistic and racist clap trap spewed by a Tory donor and barely criticised by Tory politicians tells me he/she doesn’t care about women either…

ATerrorofLeftovers · 14/03/2024 09:13

DanielGault · 14/03/2024 00:27

No, I'm quite the ignoramus. Your post is the perfect example of what I'm talking about. A complete inability to have anything approaching a civilised discussion about this issue. It doesn't further the cause, it serves to polarise.

Whoah, you think I’m not being civil? Not my intention. Just pointing out that there has been a plethora of information and reports backing up what I’m saying over the years.

If you’re not aware of them, you’re not going to be able to contribute meaningfully to the conversation, so it would be a help to you to get up the speed on what’s been going on if you do want to be part of the discussion. To clarify, this is not an attempt to be rude to you, it is just a fact that to play a useful and credible part in any discussion we need to be informed about what we’re talking about.

Lion400 · 14/03/2024 09:15

@Grapesarenottheonlyfruit ‘That the OP posted a thread like this days after the misogynistic and racist clap trap spewed by a Tory donor and barely criticised by Tory politicians tells me he/she doesn’t care about women either…’

In which case your comprehension and logical thinking facilities require some work.

OP posts:
Runningwildish · 14/03/2024 09:18

Thank goddess the derailleurs are going I'd like to have a proper conversation.

I Think that the Tories are not only say that they support safeguarding vulnerable children. They are also doing the right things. Puberty blockers not on the NHS anymore.
im interested in seeing what happens to Liz Trusses bill which will help protect women.
im extremely interested in seeing what Labour do with it. It will show us what they intend doing with women's rights if they get into power.
we'll see which side of his mouth Keir is talking.

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 14/03/2024 09:18

NoWordForFluffy · 13/03/2024 23:13

Go and do your own research.

Ahhhhh, that favourite phrase of the person who's lost the argument!

@Grapesarenottheonlyfruit, you'd probably get answers about Tory policies and how well they're doing on threads about the Tories, as weird as that may seem. Plus, bearing in mind many of us have said we won't be voting Tory, that should convey our feelings about them to you. Not that we have to justify ourselves or how we vote to you.

Out of interest, @NoWordForFluffy, who will you be voting for?

Grapesarenottheonlyfruit · 14/03/2024 09:23

@Lion400 you’re obsessed. How many threads on trans people have you posted recently ?

NoWordForFluffy · 14/03/2024 09:24

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 14/03/2024 09:18

Out of interest, @NoWordForFluffy, who will you be voting for?

Dunno. We usually only get the 4 main parties here, so nobody at the moment. I have said this over and over and over again on these threads (including up thread).

I've never not voted in a GE, so I'm really annoyed that Labour can't just show a backbone and bring clarity to this issue. If they back Liz Truss' EA amendment, that would go a very long way towards helping. Let's see!

NoWordForFluffy · 14/03/2024 09:25

The Labour canvassers nigh on ran away from me when I brought this issue up on the doorstep the other week!

EasternStandard · 14/03/2024 09:27

NoWordForFluffy · 14/03/2024 09:25

The Labour canvassers nigh on ran away from me when I brought this issue up on the doorstep the other week!

They’ve probably been briefed not to talk about it. So they can say no one’s talking about it.

Lion400 · 14/03/2024 09:30

Grapesarenottheonlyfruit · 14/03/2024 09:23

@Lion400 you’re obsessed. How many threads on trans people have you posted recently ?

Absolutely none. I have posted about women’s sex-based rights a few times.

OP posts:
NoWordForFluffy · 14/03/2024 09:30

I did comment that Keir saying nobody was talking about it wasn't true as here I was doing just that!

Our CLP are very TWAW though. Our local, Labour-led, council had a vote and passed a motion that TWAW and TMAM.

Lion400 · 14/03/2024 09:31

EasternStandard · 14/03/2024 09:27

They’ve probably been briefed not to talk about it. So they can say no one’s talking about it.

Yes!!

OP posts:
MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 14/03/2024 09:32

NoWordForFluffy · 14/03/2024 09:24

Dunno. We usually only get the 4 main parties here, so nobody at the moment. I have said this over and over and over again on these threads (including up thread).

I've never not voted in a GE, so I'm really annoyed that Labour can't just show a backbone and bring clarity to this issue. If they back Liz Truss' EA amendment, that would go a very long way towards helping. Let's see!

Thank you for answering.

I'm not happy with Labour's stance on this issue either, but as far as I can see, there is no viable left leaning party that I can vote for which offers a good alternative. So the way I see it, I have no option but to hold my nose and vote for them anyway.

I do think this issue is important but I honestly can't fathom the idea that this single issue is somehow so overwhelmingly important that it should be allowed to eclipse the many other incredibly pressing issues that are facing our country right now. What good will it do us to know what a woman is if everything else is falling apart around us? I just don't understand it.

ATerrorofLeftovers · 14/03/2024 09:32

EasternStandard · 14/03/2024 09:27

They’ve probably been briefed not to talk about it. So they can say no one’s talking about it.

Yes, they’re terrified of it. I told the ones that knocked on me to make sure they reported back that I had raised it, so the lie that nobody raises it could be squashed once and for all.

The ones I spoke to were like rabbits in the headlights. The best they could do was to bleat uncomfortably about the local party being different to the national, the candidate not agreeing with self-ID etc. When asked why the candidate hadn’t been clear about that themselves and gone on the record, then, they had no answer.

C8H10N4O2 · 14/03/2024 09:33

AdamRyan · 14/03/2024 08:50

It's not necessarily GC women but the debate is emboldening far right homophobes who love a bit of violence.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/mar/25/whats-behind-the-terrifying-backlash-against-australias-queer-community

https://honisoit.com/2023/03/queer-rights-protesters-attacked-by-far-right-hate-group/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/28/anti-trans-video-los-angeles-protest-wi-spa

There is also violence against GC women too, obviously.

Male violence is the problem, but that male violence is being directed at activists from both sides and its not right to claim the GC side are the only victims.

Really? You want to hold GC women responsible for the behaviour of violent men piggy backing on their campaign?

Women should shut up because of the behaviour of men - where have I heard that before?

NoWordForFluffy · 14/03/2024 09:39

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 14/03/2024 09:32

Thank you for answering.

I'm not happy with Labour's stance on this issue either, but as far as I can see, there is no viable left leaning party that I can vote for which offers a good alternative. So the way I see it, I have no option but to hold my nose and vote for them anyway.

I do think this issue is important but I honestly can't fathom the idea that this single issue is somehow so overwhelmingly important that it should be allowed to eclipse the many other incredibly pressing issues that are facing our country right now. What good will it do us to know what a woman is if everything else is falling apart around us? I just don't understand it.

The problem is, once you get rid of what a woman is, all of the other things which are concerning are affected by it.

Woman who's experienced DV? No guarantee of a women-only refuge. Raped? No guarantee of women-only groups. Woman who needs inpatient care in hospital? No guarantee of women-only wards. Woman who needs intimate care? No guarantee of a woman providing that care. And so on and so forth. That's why it's not as single an issue as people think it is.

Regardless of what most of us think of them, the Tories have clicked that they've been asleep at the wheel on this issue and now seem to get it / be looking to turn the tanker. It's not enough to make me vote for them, but looking at Angela Eagle's announcement last week, I sure as hell don't trust Labour with this issue. Which really fucks me off, frankly! I'm so annoyed about it.

Grapesarenottheonlyfruit · 14/03/2024 09:42

@MrsBennetsPoorNerves i agree much with what you are saying and can never ever bring myself to vote for the tories having seen what they’ve done to the
UK. I like Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves . They seem pretty sensible.

EasternStandard · 14/03/2024 09:47

ATerrorofLeftovers · 14/03/2024 09:32

Yes, they’re terrified of it. I told the ones that knocked on me to make sure they reported back that I had raised it, so the lie that nobody raises it could be squashed once and for all.

The ones I spoke to were like rabbits in the headlights. The best they could do was to bleat uncomfortably about the local party being different to the national, the candidate not agreeing with self-ID etc. When asked why the candidate hadn’t been clear about that themselves and gone on the record, then, they had no answer.

It’s likely they haven’t been equipped to deal with it and have been asked to move on to other topics if it comes up.

Reiterating you are raising the topic and report back that you are is brilliant. Everyone should get them to take note when it is raised.

ATerrorofLeftovers · 14/03/2024 09:50

NoWordForFluffy · 14/03/2024 09:39

The problem is, once you get rid of what a woman is, all of the other things which are concerning are affected by it.

Woman who's experienced DV? No guarantee of a women-only refuge. Raped? No guarantee of women-only groups. Woman who needs inpatient care in hospital? No guarantee of women-only wards. Woman who needs intimate care? No guarantee of a woman providing that care. And so on and so forth. That's why it's not as single an issue as people think it is.

Regardless of what most of us think of them, the Tories have clicked that they've been asleep at the wheel on this issue and now seem to get it / be looking to turn the tanker. It's not enough to make me vote for them, but looking at Angela Eagle's announcement last week, I sure as hell don't trust Labour with this issue. Which really fucks me off, frankly! I'm so annoyed about it.

Exactly. It’s not a single issue. It is foundational and intertwined with all the other big issues and without it, policies in those areas won’t work for women.

Many of us on this board are left-leaning and disgusted and furious with Labour that they’re making themselves into a party that we can’t vote for anymore. They need to grow a backbone and Keir needs to remove the splinters from his arse. Frankly, If he’s not able to do this, if he’s incapable of being bold and decisive and standing for what’s right, he’s not fit to be PM anyway.