“I’m basing my view on that held by several prominent early Christian’s.
That's a yes to the gnostic texts then?”
Not exactly, I’m basing this on the teachings of several prominent early Christians The term Gnostic in this context had little meaning at that time, early Christianity comprised of many different groups with different doctrines. It’s an anachronistic term. Iraneaus is largely responsible here, creating a then and is mentality esp with his “against heresies” . We can delves separately into this (again) if you want to, but the fact remains that many early Christians believed in reincarnation.
“reincarnation was a fairly common belief amongst early Christian’s.
Only among the Gnostic believers. Hebrews 9:27 alone rather pours cold water all over the notion of resurrection - "...Just as people are destined to die once, and after that to face judgment..."”
See above re “Gnostic believers”. The passage you quote has nothing to do with reincarnation. This passage is talking about the concept of “second death” which was a commonly held belief in the Middle East at that time. A belief that after the earthly “first death” you would then suffer a second death. Although the actual detail varies it was always linked to judgement. What is being said here is that for those who are saved there will be no “second death”. The idea of a second death is mention several times in Revelation. As I was saying, it’s important to understand the culture and beliefs of the society which gave rise to these writings.
in summart the passage from Hebrews does “pour cold water all over the notion of resurrection” it is talking about something entirely different. It’s so so important to understand the contemporary religious concepts when looking at the Bible if you’re going to understand it.
interestingly I see the concept of a second death quite a bit in the occult world still (which is probably why I’m more aware of it)
im really not sure what you’re saying re numerology, this has not been mentioned or alluded to can you please expand why you think numerology is relevant in the current discussion.
I’ve been very clear we are talking about Gematria this involves “calculation”/reckoning. Gematria takes the relevant number eg in Hebrew Aleph is 1, Beth 2 etc for each letter and add them up. Doing this to Nero Caeser will give you 666 or 616 depending on what language is used. This is literally doing exactly what it tells you to in Revelation.
Are you seriously suggesting a text of nearly 2000 years of age was contemplating barcodes???? It wouldn’t be more sensible to suggest it was alluding to sin and moral slavery and coins bearing the emperors name/image. The covid vaccines didn’t carry a microchip.
Yes that John, as we discussing Revelation I thought it was obvious we were discussing the John who had the er Revelation. Yes the Bible is full of mystics- probably tells you a bit about how it should be interpreted!
I’ll put some links re Jewish Mysticism. It’s very important to understand this. Especially if you’re following Pauline doctrine.
Jesus was a man. Christ is a way of being, a title separate from the man. It’s a way of being/title anyone can reach.
Hope that helps clear up any confusion