@Organictangerine
I don’t understand this. You would rather a dubious safeguarding risk went ahead than risk being seen to be agreeing with right wing Americans? It isn’t difficult, you can agree with them on one topic but not another 999 topics.
I didn't say I would rather a safeguarding risk would go ahead.
I think sending rational, fact-based, factually correct protests and challenges is more effective and less easily dismissed.
The CitizenGo petition says "The Family Show website contains a glossary of terms that they want young children to become acquainted with and includes definitions of 'BDSM', 'frottage', 'hand job' and 'squirting'. ". I don't believe that to be true. The clumsily and badly put together website offers the glossary for the podcasts as well as the show, and that until clarified, I doubt these terms appear in the show.
"There is no difference between taking children to the Family Sex Show and taking them to a seedy peep show or strip club! It raises precisely the same safeguarding concerns". Again, I don't believe this to be true. The intention of a strip club is to create sexual arousal. However dubious the Family Sex Show, nowhere does it say that it intends to provoke sexual arousal.
Repeated: That doesn't mean I support the show.
I just won't put my name to unfounded interpretations rather than the facts - which are in any case serious enough.
And actually it seems I have put more effort into my protest than just signing a petition.