Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

Should the primary earner have to take time off for sick children?

163 replies

Sunshine231 · 01/05/2026 16:20

I am the “breadwinner” in our household and pay 75% of all our household bills / expenses plus any extras like meals out, family days out and holidays. I have a high pressure job as a senior associate for a consultancy firm. My partner works in a warehouse packing and labelling online orders and earns minimum wage.

We have 2 kids and whenever one of the kids is unwell I am the one who has to take time off work. I was talking to my mum and she said it was always the way when she had young kids, that the mum had to take leave to care for the kids and never the dad but I can’t help but feel this is because traditionally the man was the higher earner therefore their job took priority because that’s the job they relied on to pay most of the bills?

My partner however thinks that because I work from home and he has to go in person, it makes sense that I take the time off. My work has a strict no kids rule regarding working from home and I also have multiple client calls per day.

Today our youngest was sick and I had to tell my boss I needed to take last minute leave. I had to cancel 4 client calls and it went down like a lead balloon. This is the 3rd time I’ve had to do this so far this year alone. I have bad anxiety about losing my job as we rely on it to pay the bills. I’m just trying to get perspective on whether my partner is right about the wfh thing or should my job be more priority as I’m the higher earner and contributing most financially?

OP posts:
WonderingWanda · 01/05/2026 16:46

Shared to reduce the impact on both jobs.

I was part time when my kids were little but dh who was a much higher earner still took days off because he understood that my teaching career was still important and it wasn't always great for me to take the time off.

HeadingforaHundred · 01/05/2026 16:46

We split it. I can’t wfh so I have to take a day off. DH does wfh as our kids are older so will survive if left in front of the tv while he works.

Monty36 · 01/05/2026 16:49

It may depend on two things. Whether the child is wanting ‘mum’. And how the respective employers are when it comes to leave for child related issues. One may be far more accommodating than the other.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

Sunshine231 · 01/05/2026 16:49

Monty36 · 01/05/2026 16:49

It may depend on two things. Whether the child is wanting ‘mum’. And how the respective employers are when it comes to leave for child related issues. One may be far more accommodating than the other.

What if neither employer is accommodating though?

OP posts:
Jk987 · 01/05/2026 16:51

Shared. If your partner doesn’t get family leave he should take holiday.

Quietasamouse3 · 01/05/2026 16:51

Totally agree with you op
He should be taking time of
You are keeping the family afloat

WallaceinAnderland · 01/05/2026 16:52

It should be shared. All parents need time off work sometimes for their children, we all do it.

Iocanepowder · 01/05/2026 16:53

You should both be splitting it.

why are you worried about losing your job? Surely you’re entitled to parental leave like everyone?

BreakingBroken · 01/05/2026 16:53

sounds like you need someone on call for childcare even if you wfh.
ideally if a child is sick while your working you could call this theoretical child care worker to pick up and stay with your child while you both continue working.

do you have family that could fill this void?

MightyGoldBear · 01/05/2026 16:54

It's should be fair 50 50 but as we know life doesn't roll that way. As the lower earner(set shifts no flexibility easily replaceable) whilst I was trying to establish myself in a job my dh did all the sick days and school pick ups I couldn't do. Untill his boss had to take time off for surgery so he was needed on site, couldn't be so flexible. As the higher earner we had to prioritise his job. Unfortunately my child has ebsa/audhd so me working too really just didn't work. The company were not flexible at all. So I had to give up my job. Obviously you don't want that so it just means both of you taking it in turns and keeping on the right side of keeping both your jobs. Ultimately if yours pays the bills then it gets prioritised but your dh working is still important.

ParisianLady · 01/05/2026 16:54

Agree with it being split evenly between you. You are both parents you should both cover it. Earnings and seniority have no impact on this in my mind.

FateAmenableToChange · 01/05/2026 16:58

Sit him down and explain you are close to losing your job due to the amount of last minute time you have had to take off this year, that your boss was visibly annoyed and the situation is not good. That it cannot happen again without serious consequences.

The job market is shocking right now, employers know it, and they know they have all the power. Ask him does he want to step up and do his fair share or take the risk you lose your job and he becomes the sole breadwinner. Explain to him with whats happening in AI the job market in consulting is very bad and likely you would be unemployed for a long time, and may have to retrain. Ask him what scenario he prefers. Be very serious. It is serious.

JLou08 · 01/05/2026 16:59

In my experience, minimum wage jobs are a lot less flexible and less understanding of caring responsibilities. I'm guessing in a role like yours, you will still get the same salary if you pick the kids up as you can make up the hours? If he is on a zero hour contract, or picked up extra shifts on top of his contracted hours, taking time off for sick children will put him at the bottom of the list for hours.
It's really not as simple as the highest earner has priority. You need to both understand how it impacts each of you to take time off and come to a joint decision. If it is really stressful taking time off for the children, maybe consider him being a SAHP and you paying his living expenses and into a pension for him.

Comefromaway · 01/05/2026 17:00

As an employer if I felt that you were taking an unreasonable amount of emergency dependents leave then it would trigger a disciplinary. Reasonable isn’t a set amount of time but is dependent on the circumstances. A single parent with no family support would be treated more sympathetically than a two parent household as we would expect both parents to take turns.

make sure that this time off is logged as emergency dependents leave as this can’t be held against you if the time off is reasonable & is only to deal with the initial emergency so a day or two rather than a whole week off.

canuckup · 01/05/2026 17:01

Does he contribute anything positive to the relationship?

buffor · 01/05/2026 17:02

In my house it is DH, even though he earns significantly more. I teach, so it is difficult to have a day off. It is much easier for DH to arrange to work from home, or catch up in evenings or weekends. I think it should be the parent with the most flexibility regardless of pay.

Catsarestillflumpy · 01/05/2026 17:03

More senior jobs usually come with more flexibility so it depends on both your workplaces attitudes. If he was going to get sacked for being off too much then I can see why you do more.

SummerInSun · 01/05/2026 17:03

Iwanttobeafraser · 01/05/2026 16:24

aah, thi sis what I refer to as the "Tesco worker" demonstration of gendered roles.

Basically, my theory is that if you have a couple who both work for tesco but one in the store on a shift basis as a teller earning less, and the other one in head office earning the main family income. This is the argument depending on which one is which:

Man in HQ, woman as teller: She must take the time off because she is less well paid and her job is not a 'career' so even if things go badly, her job being lost has less impact on the family.

Woman in HQ and man as teller: She must take time off becuase she is in the office and work is more flexible whereas as a shift worker he is a) letting the whole team down if he is out and b) he has a higher chance of losing his job and that would be bad for him and for the family, even if she earns more.

Do your best to nip this one in the bud now. My DH was a SAHD so I think you can understand that he is NOT the kind of man who thinks that childcare is "women's work" and yet.... the above trap is one we 100% fell into when he started picking up more work. And I have resented it a great deal.

It may well be that as a couple you decide that yes, you CAN be a bit more flexible, but that doesn't mean entirely flexible. Nex ttime DC are sick - I believe you have that very important presentation to senior management? If you were to miss that, it would absolutely jeopardise how you are viewed in your organisation wouldn't it? Potentially bonus impacting?

This is a brilliant post and expresses it so well!!

My DH and I share taking time off when the kids are ill, based on who has what in their diary for the day (not who earns more). If one of us had 4 calls with external stakeholders like clients, that would be the person who absolutely would NOT be taking time off that day!

AgnesMcDoo · 01/05/2026 17:03

We split it.

Decision is made made based on work diaries.

I'm the higher earner but he is an equal parent.

cadburyegg · 01/05/2026 17:04

It should be shared and the fact he refuses is even worse BECAUSE he is the lower earner. My exh earns next to nothing yet has taken maybe 2 sick days off with our kids. Since we split he hasn’t done any. Kids are now 11 and 8. I hope you have a good relationship in general otherwise the resentment will kill your relationship.

Sunshine231 · 01/05/2026 17:05

Iocanepowder · 01/05/2026 16:53

You should both be splitting it.

why are you worried about losing your job? Surely you’re entitled to parental leave like everyone?

What is parental leave? I have to take it as annual leave. The company has a policy that annual leave requests have to be put in 1 month in advance. So asking for leave on the day is technically against company policy. Plus the fact I have to cancel important meetings every time. It reflects badly on me and my performance in the role. Other people on the team do not do this. I’m the only one.

OP posts:
cadburyegg · 01/05/2026 17:08

AgnesMcDoo · 01/05/2026 17:03

We split it.

Decision is made made based on work diaries.

I'm the higher earner but he is an equal parent.

This is the only sensible way of doing it

Sunshine231 · 01/05/2026 17:08

Catsarestillflumpy · 01/05/2026 17:03

More senior jobs usually come with more flexibility so it depends on both your workplaces attitudes. If he was going to get sacked for being off too much then I can see why you do more.

I don’t know if it’s because it’s a consultancy firm but there is no additional flexibility from being in a more senior role. Each consultant is their own “manager” if that makes sense. So being a manager does not necessarily mean people management, it means managing projects, budgeting, client management etc. I believe this is similar to how it would be in a law firm.

OP posts:
Comefromaway · 01/05/2026 17:09

Parental leave is different. It’s planned & your employer can defer it to another time.

What you are taking is Emergency Dependents leave. It is a legal right & is for someone to deal with an emergency involving a dependent (not only children could be a parent or spouse).

Grabity · 01/05/2026 17:10

Man’s Big Job takes priority over woman’s job. Man’s Little Job takes priority over woman’s job. Man’s Hobby takes priority. Man’s holidays, football on tv, pub crawl, …

This is the natural order of the world, should you choose to accept it.