Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

Can a family court judge force my child into nurserh

408 replies

ShyasminW · 05/02/2025 20:32

Please help I would be really grateful
I have a family court final hearing next week and my ex has put forward his position and wants 50/50 shared care and he wants our son to go into a nursery on his days during the week

i only work part time I do one night shift at the weekend when son is with his dad

I provide full time care all week for my son and son goes to dad for tea mid week after he finishes work

my worry is a judge will force me to take him to nursery half the week on dads time when I am available for him

the nursery he wants our son to go to is 30 minutes from my home approximately I know it’s in an area that’s at least this far from me, and I don’t drive so I would have to get a bus to take him to nursery on “dads days” I also don’t know the name of this nursery as he said it’s linked to his work and he gets discount but he hasn’t stated the name of the nursery to his solicitor (or they haven’t told me) so I won’t know this until we are in court (we do not have any communication me and dad so I can’t ask him)
do you think a judge would force my 18 month old son into nursery when I am available to care for him
can they force me to take him even though I am available to care for him

cafcass did not recommend 50/50 either

sorry this long post

OP posts:
Unexpectedlysinglemum · 05/02/2025 22:37

WB205020 · 05/02/2025 21:49

@ShyasminW It will do your DC the world of good to go to nursery. He will learn invaluable skills. It will also enable you to get some independence and work more hours whilst he is there or with his dad.

I disagree. I wish I could stay home with my toddler. The staff are lovely but he is ill constantly, so many viruses, he gets upset when staff change and cries at drop offs. He learnt so much language when he had two weeks just with me at Xmas. It would be much better for a toddler to be with mummy taking him to baby classes and the library and toddler group than being at nursery. From over age 2 they start to need friends but at 18 m he'd be much better off with mum.

ShyasminW · 05/02/2025 22:38

OnceUponASausage · 05/02/2025 22:04

OP I wouldn’t mention in court that you don’t have to work. I would state in court that this would present unnecessary difficulty for you and isn’t in the best interest of your child.

  • The 2255 would restrict your ability to increase your hours of work. It doesn’t matter that you don’t need to work. Don’t mention this. If it comes up - well that’s hearsay. Just because that’s the situation right now doesn’t mean it will always be. We never know what the future holds. Stick to this. If you decided you wanted to, it would limit your options. Ex is seeking to limit your ability to work. However. If your personal circumstances remain as they are
  • Due to your availability it makes sense that school will be near you rather than 30 mins away. You will be available to get him there and pick him up without the need for wraparound care, which will be in the best interest of your child. You will be immediately available to support his education, help with homework, reading, phonics etc. As this is you don’t want nursery to be 30 mins away as ex will seek to continue this with school, wanting a school in his local area, and if he takes it to court they may agree with him if son is already attending nursery in that location.
  • 2255 will also be hard on your son once he starts school. It’s very disruptive given the distance, and small children need consistency, which you would be able to provide due to your personal circumstances.
  • You know full well that due to your ‘current’ circumstances any sick day cover will fall to you - another argument against 5050 and should be a deciding factor of nursery/school being local to you. I expect it will also be the case with school holidays and you will be expected to cover them all.
  • You don’t currently have 5050. There is police involvement. Cafcass don’t recommend 5050. There are no safeguarding concerns related to you. Your son is settled and thriving. Courts don’t like to upset the status quo. You have a handover process in place and it works. It makes no sense to put a child in nursery when his mother is against this and available to look after him.
  • You don’t drive. The location of nursery and the fact you don’t drive, along with the fact you are able to look after your son without the need for nursery just strikes me as a way of your ex continuing his abuse - it’s a deliberate inconvenience to you, and unnecessary because you don’t need to use nursery at all

Good luck

Edited

Thank you

OP posts:
Scentedjasmin · 05/02/2025 22:38

InWalksBarberalla · 05/02/2025 22:34

It's not being unkind to suggest you get proper legal advice for your situation.

The comment was pretty abrupt though. Why shouldn't she ask for other people's experiences? Why assume that she's not already asked or plans to ask a solicitor. The comment was rather patronising to be fair.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

Springsareup · 05/02/2025 22:38

Has he checked nursery has the space? All nurseries around here are full with an 18 month waiting list.

Crackednuts · 05/02/2025 22:40

ShyasminW · 05/02/2025 21:32

Why would I do that?

why do people work more hours ? Because they need more money

i am not in that position that is not my situation

please don’t be rude

Why does Elon Musk work? Footballers earn a 100k a week and when their career is done they end up broke because they stop working. Something to think about in the future. It needs to come in from somewhere. Rich people are risk takers that's why they have money.

Iwanttoliveonamountain · 05/02/2025 22:41

I think the nursery is a red herring

Goldbar · 05/02/2025 22:45

Crackednuts · 05/02/2025 22:40

Why does Elon Musk work? Footballers earn a 100k a week and when their career is done they end up broke because they stop working. Something to think about in the future. It needs to come in from somewhere. Rich people are risk takers that's why they have money.

Bit bizarre. The OP, like most of us, isn't a footballer or Elon Musk. So long as she's living within her means and not burning through capital, she's probably ok for the time-being and she may want to work more when her DC is older. It's ok not to love your job to the extent that you want to unnecessarily sacrifice time with your DC to it, if actually you can afford to make this choice.

Crackednuts · 05/02/2025 22:45

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

PyongyangKipperbang · 05/02/2025 22:46

CJsGoldfish · 05/02/2025 22:26

Great but is that really all you want to do? Be a "stay at home mum" Or has it become a tactic in this tug of war where your child in the middle?
Stay at home mum does NOT guarantee 'stability', believe me on that.

Obviously, it's not for any of us to decide the issue but I would hope a judge would see past what you are trying to do and decide with your child at heart.

Picks up and drop offs should be shared and neither should be put out more than necessary. So there'd clearly be some things to sort out if he got the extra time but, as adults, you get it done because this is about the child you share and will share forever
It really is just about splitting the time fairly and staying in your own corner when it is not you time 🤷‍♀️

Several issues.....

The child is 18 months, many many women choose to be a SAHM until school age. That usually takes a financial or career sacrifice, usually both, within the family. The OP is fortunate that she doesnt have that issue. I am sure that when her child is older she will then decide the best way forward for her. No one is "JUST" anything.

I hope that the judge would also decide in the childs best interests, which is patently not to spend time in a childcare setting involving a 1.5 hour bus commute to get there and back when his mother is willing and able to care for him herself.

Pick ups and drop offs can not be shared because the police and cafcass have both said that the ex cannot be anywhere near the OP.

His plan is that she isnt "in her corner" (charming turn of phrase...) on his time, its about her spending her child free time, running around doing his bidding. Why? Because his actions have led to the police and cafcass saying that he cannot pick up DS from her as he is a danger to her. And he clearly doesnt want her to have licence to choose how she spends the time without DS, so he engineers this plan so that she cant.

This is not about what is "BEST" for the child but about an abusive man continuing to abuse via other means. Google "Abuse via the family court" its a know phenomenon and a dangerous one at that. Its how abusive men, even when they are abusive to their own children, get forced access to said children and the mothers can do nothing to prevent it.

allthemiddlechildrenoftheworld · 05/02/2025 22:48

@ShyasminW who will put dc into nursery when you ex has them if he has early start?? he surely doesnt expect the dc to stay at your house just for sleeping? why did you not arrange the nursery at your end so your child could get some social enrichment? this could have been done before your ex decided to involve a nursery

JaneAustensHeroine · 05/02/2025 22:51

ShyasminW · 05/02/2025 22:17

I have a lot of anxiety and I like to hear things from more than one person as sometimes people get it wrong
it’s nice to hear from other people and their experiences
please be kind

Hearing things from more than one person is going to increase your anxiety not make it better.

You share a child and you are not necessarily going to be able to control what your child’s father does with your child when he has him.

A few posters have mentioned that you could use the time without your child to develop your interests and work towards your own goals. Work isn’t only about money, it’s about wellbeing, activity, meeting people and being mentally stimulated.

Your stance has little to do with your child’s welfare and a lot to do with what you want and would prefer to happen. That’s fair enough but at least be honest with yourself.

You could see this as a positive thing; your child having more contact with his Dad, your child having learning opportunities and play at nursery but you are so intent on maintaining the status quo that you can’t even consider the possible benefits of any alternatives.

babyproblems · 05/02/2025 22:51

Given you don’t have to see your ex due to the cafcass order I think this would be grounds for you to refuse saying you cannot take him to nursery on dads days as it’s not local to you and you do not drive. Seems odd he wants 50:50 and you’re in court when it’s not recommended. I’d think he won’t be getting his way!!

PyongyangKipperbang · 05/02/2025 22:52

Crackednuts · 05/02/2025 22:40

Why does Elon Musk work? Footballers earn a 100k a week and when their career is done they end up broke because they stop working. Something to think about in the future. It needs to come in from somewhere. Rich people are risk takers that's why they have money.

Elon Musk doesnt work, you dear sweet naive fool!

Most top rankers in football dont end up broke, the ones that do have addiction issues. As do the very poorest in society, often becoming addicts because of poverty rather than the other way around.

And what the hell has this to do with anything that the OP asked?!

babyproblems · 05/02/2025 22:52

PyongyangKipperbang · 05/02/2025 22:46

Several issues.....

The child is 18 months, many many women choose to be a SAHM until school age. That usually takes a financial or career sacrifice, usually both, within the family. The OP is fortunate that she doesnt have that issue. I am sure that when her child is older she will then decide the best way forward for her. No one is "JUST" anything.

I hope that the judge would also decide in the childs best interests, which is patently not to spend time in a childcare setting involving a 1.5 hour bus commute to get there and back when his mother is willing and able to care for him herself.

Pick ups and drop offs can not be shared because the police and cafcass have both said that the ex cannot be anywhere near the OP.

His plan is that she isnt "in her corner" (charming turn of phrase...) on his time, its about her spending her child free time, running around doing his bidding. Why? Because his actions have led to the police and cafcass saying that he cannot pick up DS from her as he is a danger to her. And he clearly doesnt want her to have licence to choose how she spends the time without DS, so he engineers this plan so that she cant.

This is not about what is "BEST" for the child but about an abusive man continuing to abuse via other means. Google "Abuse via the family court" its a know phenomenon and a dangerous one at that. Its how abusive men, even when they are abusive to their own children, get forced access to said children and the mothers can do nothing to prevent it.

Agree with all of this!!

starlight26 · 05/02/2025 22:53

I would argue the impact of a nursery start on your ds with the current situation he's getting used to.
Babies can take weeks/ months to settle and I'm not convinced a new setting is ideal at this time.

If you say you don't want nursery you need a back up of reason's.

MumblesParty · 05/02/2025 22:54

CJsGoldfish · 05/02/2025 22:26

Great but is that really all you want to do? Be a "stay at home mum" Or has it become a tactic in this tug of war where your child in the middle?
Stay at home mum does NOT guarantee 'stability', believe me on that.

Obviously, it's not for any of us to decide the issue but I would hope a judge would see past what you are trying to do and decide with your child at heart.

Picks up and drop offs should be shared and neither should be put out more than necessary. So there'd clearly be some things to sort out if he got the extra time but, as adults, you get it done because this is about the child you share and will share forever
It really is just about splitting the time fairly and staying in your own corner when it is not you time 🤷‍♀️

@CJsGoldfish I think you need to read OP’s posts. She’s clearly inherited a lot of money, she lives comfortably, and she has an 18 month old. Who in their right mind would want to go to work and pay for child care when they didn’t have to? She has stability because she has money. If she wants to retrain and work when her son is older, she can. But right now, she wants to make the most of her son’s pre school years. If you can’t understand that then I feel sad for you.

Codlingmoths · 05/02/2025 22:57

Also op, find a great nursery right near you, and in your court statement say I am more than happy right now to spend all my time with my son. If I wanted to send him to a nursery id send him to one near me, I don’t drive and his dad does, while moving him to a nursery near his dad is a 45 minute bus ride for me and a 4yo, which doesn’t make sense. There are a couple of great nurseries near me. Also, I would like my son to go to <name a school>, I’m planning to be around for volunteering, reading etc at school and drop him and collect him, I can’t do that volunteering if his school is 45 mins by bus also and if it’s nearby I can be an active parent for him there, his dad isn’t planning on doing that and could easily drive himself there if he were.

MumblesParty · 05/02/2025 22:57

OP it would be completely impractical for you to travel on public transport to drop your son at nursery, just so he’s there for your ex to collect, while you spend the day on your own. I just wouldn’t do it. Even if it was court ordered - which I doubt it would be - I simply wouldn’t take him. Every day I’d say he was ill, or I was ill, or the bus didn’t come. Then when your ex finished work I’d take him to a contact point to collect him. The time spent with his Dad would be exactly the same.

Fluffyowl00 · 05/02/2025 22:58

Keep your chin up! You can do this.

I think you need to have a list:
I absolutely support the idea of 50/50 if that is what his father wants. I want my child to be happy.
It is in my child’s best interest for that to be regular days. Maybe Monday-Weds with you Thursday Fri with him. Alternate weekends (whatever works for you)
I support the idea of nursery 2 days a week (dad’s days). It will need to be inbetween us both. Examples could be x,y,z (look at childcare.co.uk for potentials and maybe visit). Or if one near him he will need to drop off close to my location. Fine with that. However would prefer to make friends nearby as when school age comes it will not be fair on my child to travel long distances on the bus every day, so would prefer somewhere inbetween us both.
My child will not be going to nursery on my days as we have a busy schedule of swimming/parks etc. vital for development. So important father finds a nursery that will accept part time.
I care about my child and want to ensure they have a great childhood and want to ensure that the time they spend with me is quality time and not spent travelling
needlessly.

Play the game and be strong. It probably won’t last anyway.

I would like to apologise for some of the negativity on here. Very unfair to you.

Good luck.

ShyasminW · 05/02/2025 22:59

JaneAustensHeroine · 05/02/2025 22:51

Hearing things from more than one person is going to increase your anxiety not make it better.

You share a child and you are not necessarily going to be able to control what your child’s father does with your child when he has him.

A few posters have mentioned that you could use the time without your child to develop your interests and work towards your own goals. Work isn’t only about money, it’s about wellbeing, activity, meeting people and being mentally stimulated.

Your stance has little to do with your child’s welfare and a lot to do with what you want and would prefer to happen. That’s fair enough but at least be honest with yourself.

You could see this as a positive thing; your child having more contact with his Dad, your child having learning opportunities and play at nursery but you are so intent on maintaining the status quo that you can’t even consider the possible benefits of any alternatives.

he isn’t spending more time with his dad is he at nursery

hearing other peoples stories is good for me

thank you

OP posts:
Bannedontherun · 05/02/2025 22:59

@ShyasminW Put this on the legal board seems to me here that there are a bunch of judgemental fuckwits on here who know nothing.

It is obvious to anyone with half a brain that if you are available to look after your child and the other parent is not then that care will be allotted to you especially as this is an 18 month old.

Please repost on legal

Silvertulips · 05/02/2025 23:00

Some of your thinking comes across as argumentative, don’t do this.

You need to be factual and practical.

Dont put the ball in his park - for example don’t say ‘well how is that going to work?’ Say that wouldn’t be in x best interest because in means - I am too far away should there be an accident, I don’t drive, I can not arrange transport to collect or drop off, it makes X day longer, school holidays could be spent with a parent rather than a nursery setting, X has a routine near me, baby groups, friends, meet ups, he would have less contact with your sister, parents, family support - close to doctors or what ever

Again think of your advantages, not what he does in his time, not how you enrich your sines existence with how things are now.

Sunshine1500 · 05/02/2025 23:00

ShyasminW · 05/02/2025 21:00

we do not have direct contact so on the days that son wakes up with me it would then be dads day so I would have to take him to nursery but I would rather just keep my son with me as I don’t need him to attend nursery

try not worry he’s just trying to scare you , men like this don’t want 50/50 they just don’t want to pay maintenance.

Crackednuts · 05/02/2025 23:06

PyongyangKipperbang · 05/02/2025 22:52

Elon Musk doesnt work, you dear sweet naive fool!

Most top rankers in football dont end up broke, the ones that do have addiction issues. As do the very poorest in society, often becoming addicts because of poverty rather than the other way around.

And what the hell has this to do with anything that the OP asked?!

Elon invests his money he takes risks so he can fatten his account even more. He is a business man. It's true about footballers. Even if they are not addicts keeping up with the same lifestyle as if they had that money coming in every week is a different ask. I knew a footballer his mother was investing his money in businesses. She wasn't having her son and herself go back to nothing and eating rubbish.

My post has nothing to do with her question I'm not a solicitor. Something to think about in the future.

Burntt · 05/02/2025 23:07

Short answer yes a judge could order this.

My abusive ex didn't know where I was living. Because of this I was expected to transport kids to handover that suited him. Contact had to work around his shifts as I "wasn't working". I was in maternity leave and the fact contact in shifts fucked my ability to return to work was meaningless to the judge.

My barrister said we had a really bad judge and was shocked at the outcome. So likelihood is it won't go so bad for you. But family court judges have a lot of power and no oversight. Most family court is closed so their terrible judgment cannot be held up to scrutiny by the public. It's a terrible system

Swipe left for the next trending thread