Once again, thanks so much for all the replies. This has definitely been an interesting threat to read through! I have read every single comment. The insults, I expected, and am not in the slightest ruffled by this. But to the people commenting and explaining the reality of what can go wrong I truly appreciate it. There was one specific comment that I wanted to highlight from @Nafotdbs s who sums up really nicely.
"While a baby obviously cannot give consent, in an era where ‘the absence of a no does not mean yes’, perhaps we should assume that until they can actively consent, we do not have it, and should refrain from sharing content whose effects we cannot control. Again, not pertaining to actions equating to personal hygiene, nutrition and person safety, but certainly to things which are superfluous, like posting pictures on the internet."
I may as well clarify to satisfy any curiosity.
I watched my in laws 2 minutes after meeting her for the first time, taking a picture and sending it to a friend of theirs, someone we don't even know. We have explained to them that we do not wish for our child to have an internet presence and they repeated to do it.
And as well as that my own mother point blank after being asked to not to share online etc put her picture online.
We have sent images to the in laws. However they have shown zero interest in her despite us trying. I can only surmise that images are more important than say, video calls, or even coming to see her which I can say categorically we want to happen.
Anyway didn't need to explain but I can see how curious everyone is. Not interested in changing anyone's opinions. But thank you to anyone who understands and resonates with our
concerns.