Many people have answered why they think there is a prevalence of bottle feeding - to think of a few myself:
The mother can’t breastfeed because of medical reasons (such as premature birth)
The mother doesn’t wish to breastfeed (her decision at the end of the day).
The baby is unable to breastfeed and thrive.
Poor education around breastfeeding and little/no support for this after having a baby.
Extremely painful experience putting mothers off trying again.
Severe anxiety from the mother that she isn’t able to provide enough milk naturally to sustain her baby. Or running herself into the ground attempting to keep breastfeeding going to detriment of her own health.
From as neutral perspective as I can muster, I think formula comes with a certain level of assurance for most people, that it will include the right balance of nutrients where we can’t guarantee our own diets, therefore our own breast milk is as balanced. There is a lot of contradictory advice online between what does and doesn’t impact breast milk and the last thing new mothers want when feeding their baby is uncertainty.
Or maybe the mum is so dependent on her morning coffee during those early days and can’t quite figure out if the caffeine will impact her baby negatively. It’s one of those questions that has no easily defined answer, but posting on MN with a strong view on FF affecting bonds and the like is quite likely to ensure a backlash from mothers who are simply doing their best and hate to think their decision (or lack thereof in my case) to not breastfeed means the bond with their baby was adversely and irrevocably altered.
I also don’t know why suggesting the idea that FF is an unhealthy choice and then acting amazed that people disagree quite verbosely is a way to have a genuine conversation on the matter.