The same way you seem to "know" that no paedophile could ever be cured probably, doormat.
I read a lot. I'm interested in psychology. I've also read newspaper reports which have been a little more detailed than I would have wanted to read which describes exactly what type of child porn has been hawled in. Simple naked children playing doesn't even register. Quite horrific.
I would imagine child porn is the same as normal porn, with certain psychologies, frequent use would start to lessen any effectiveness and more hard core material sought out. So I believe it is unlikely any photos in that garden that were taken would have a wide distribution.
The truth of the matter is we just don't know about the psychology of paedophila and there are degrees. Some may well have a disorder which has led their sexual "orientation" to be aimed at children. Others have suffered horrific abuse themselves. There's still not much known. To state categorically that there is no chance of rehabilitation just doesn't have any scientific basis.
I find it very disturbing that there are people on the thread who insist that child porn is illegal (which it is, and I want all legal means used to stop it too) and that the book should be thrown at them, but conveniently want to ignore harrassment or extremes as murder laws to apply to themselves. What sort of message is that giving to our children about respect of authority?! I'm so glad I'm not in the police or have any family in the police...
Yes, I agree. Paedophilia is horrific and sick. But it pisses me off something chronic to think that our already overstretched police service has to waste valuable manhours protecting these people from "well meaning" citizens instead of spending that time searching out and convicting unidentified paedophiles.
To get this in perspective, the biggest abuse risk to children is still at the hands of their own families. "Stranger Danger" is thankfully still rare. Not that the tabloids would tell you that - it doesn't sell enough papers.