As spacecadet says, the well written diary is invaluable. Good use of words in her example. ie loud music, shouting obscenities aggressive
Through working with asbo I've learned what can and can't be used.
example - if a neighbour makes a statement as follows - I heard the sound of breaking glass so I looked outside and saw that my greenhouse was broken. I saw 3 youths walking away but it was dark so i couldn't see their faces. I knew it was X Y and Z because they are always here causing trouble and breaking things.
This will not be used. It will not even reach court as a witness statement and if it does will be thrown out. Very frustrating, because we all know it was X Y and Z but the statement is too vague and does not identify them.
Instead the statement should say - I looked outside and saw 3 youths. Although it was dark, there was street lighting close by which enabled me to recognise them as x y and z.
another example - they were shouting obscenities - not as good as - as I entered my house they were shouting obscenities, swearing and making threatening remarks regarding breaking my windows. As I looked back at them they were staring at me and so I knew these remarks were directed at me. I felt extremely vulnerable on this occasion and fearful. I rushed inside my house and locked my door.
If you cannot hand on heart possitively identify them then don't. A witness in my case made this mistake and it turns out the boy she claimed was doing blah was with the social worker who can make a statement saying so. This puts the rest of your statement into question.
some rules - ignor hearsay, use fact. If your hear in the local shop that they have just shot 127 people in the park you cannot use this in your statement. It's hearsay. It will upset you but it's hearsay. If they have done it, someone else will deal with it.
A closing footnote to your finished statement could contain ' I feel extremely fearful for my safety as I am aware that they have alledgedly killed 127 people. The keyword here is still could
It all revolves around fact. A judge may have sympathy if you tell him you are ill because of this but he can't act on it. If your doctor says you are ill, he can (same applies to housing)
Basically (as I said to you) your arms could fall off but they can't believe it unless a doctor has confirmed it.
facts = time, date, witnesses, written evidence, identify, exactly where they are, direction they are going, coming from etc etc