Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Other subjects

REALLY EMBARRASSING q about waxing "bits"

130 replies

sillysally · 31/01/2005 15:36

I've changed my name I'm so embarrassed but I am a regular on here, honest!

Anyway, my inner labia protude about half an inch or so from the outer. I am so ashamed of this I can't bear to get a wax, which I would really like, particularly for the birth of my first baby. I would want the poor waxer to get right in to all my nooks and crannies down there ideally including, to be really gross and even more , between my buttocks

Has anyone here been in this predicament? What would/did you do?

I know there is similarly themed thread on here today, and that's what's got me thinking about it again.

OP posts:
cariad21 · 01/02/2005 14:44

Silly sally, I think you're asking some very pertinent questions. I had an elective c-section so I had to do a bit of shaving but managed it pretty well without help, I didn't bother too much with the surrounding foliage as I didn't think there'd be much examination of those bits.

CosmeticJunkie · 01/02/2005 14:49

I should clarify, the aforementioned 'drips' were all my own making

welshmum · 01/02/2005 14:50

Now when dd asks me what the hair there is for I'll have another reason to give her - apart from 'it keeps mummy's fanny warm.....'

happymerryberries · 01/02/2005 14:55

I'm a biology teacher and do you know, I have no idea why humans have pubic hair? Anyone know? I'm too frightened to put it into a serch engine!

sillysally · 01/02/2005 14:56

ROLF CosmeticJunkie I wasn't even thinking of that actually!!

Gosh Welshmum - that's a very sensible (and practical) reply to that particular question (well, your original one anyway...)

Cariad - it's good to know shaving yourself is possible prior to the birth, I guess I'll have stretch a bit further than you did to get at the undergrowth, as it were {grin]

OP posts:
misdee · 01/02/2005 14:56

HMb yyou should be telling us that!

CosmeticJunkie · 01/02/2005 14:57

lmao yeah Welshie, I had no idea pubes were that useful before I got rid of them either

Uh oh Sally, I thought that's what you were giggling at, just my dirty mind!

sillysally · 01/02/2005 14:59

HMB, I did hear (god knows where) that it acts as a kind of lubricant (like under your arms) to stop your skin chafing. I suppose this would apply to your "mound" when "bd-ing"

OP posts:
happymerryberries · 01/02/2005 14:59

Nope! No idea!! It isn't on the national curriculum, I know that much

I'm about to teach sex ed to my year 10s soon. I bet one of them will ask me too!

Anyone on MN know why????

happymerryberries · 01/02/2005 14:59

Blimey, I don't bonk enough to chafe these days

Bozza · 01/02/2005 15:04

HunkerMunker - I was thinking the same thing about the piles TBH. Which is why (with an 8 mo DD) I wouldn't have my arse waxed although it could probably do with it (see I've admitted it with my real username). Also agree that during the birth process your anatomy is somewhat changed. I opted to get DH to trim my pubes with his hair clippers (complete with guard) but that too was to prevent the matting. If you are anything like me you bleed a lot afterwards. Like Kate I wore a gown first time but had DD at home so wore a nightie. Only had a two minute second stage so didn't bleed that much at the time but then cuddled DD who was fairly manky - covered in various substances.

happymerryberries · 01/02/2005 15:12

OK I was brave/odd enough to googe and found this

Apparently, your friends have stumbled upon one of the eternal mysteries of the human body. After reviewing some theories on why pubic hair exists, it appears there's no definitive answer. It seems as though the prevailing theory relates to pheromones ? scents that the body produces that can be sexually stimulating to others.

It's thought that the tufts of hair that grow around the genitals, as well as under the arms, capture these erotic scents. Pheromones get trapped in the pubic 'do when apocrine glands release an odorless secretion on the surface of the skin that combines with bacteria decomposed by the secretions of the sebaceous glands. Believe it or not, humans have the same number of hair follicles as apes, except our body hair is generally very fine or barely visible in comparison. So, while pubic hair and underarm hair might be considered the primary scent traps, they're by no means the only ones. For some people, scents from these areas are noticeable and consciously increase sexual arousal. For others, pheromones might not be obvious but may be detected subconsciously.

A few hypotheses also exist about why we have hair on our pubic places. Some people believe that it keeps our genitals warm. In prehistoric times, when only a loincloth was worn to cover the penis or vulva, this might have held true. However, the idea that a pubic mane exists for warmth doesn't make much sense in today's world since our genitals are kept toasty by clothing. In order for this theory to be true, it would seem that our bodies would probably have evolved to the point where we would have lost the need for pubic hair, which is not the case. Also, if it were intended for generating heat, wouldn't we have much more pubic hair? If this were so, men would probably have hair on the shaft of their penis and more hair on the scrotum to insulate the testicles; women would have hair on the skin of their lower torso to insulate the internal reproductive organs. Others believe that the purpose of women's pubic tresses is similar to that of cilia in the nose (a.k.a., nose hair), in that it prevents dirt from entering the vagina. Okay, this makes some sense... but why wouldn't men have similar protective locks around the opening of their urethra?

Other theories regarding the purpose of pubic hair probably exist, but currently, the pheromone theory seems to be the most logical. As far as non-functional use goes, pubic hair can be decorative or attractive to their owners or to others. Some of the related Q&As below explore the many aesthetic possibilities of pubic hairdos.

For more information about pheromones and their effect(s) on sexuality, look for James Vaughn Kohl and Robert T. Francoeur's book, The Scent of Eros: Mysteries of Odor in Human Sexuality.

From go Ask Alice. Well now I know what to say when my y10s ask me

aloha · 01/02/2005 15:35

Can I just say sillysally (whoever you really are!), and at risk of sounding patronising, what a pleasure it is to have someone posting who never takes offence! I think some people would have gone through the roof at being taken the piss out of, but you seem gloriously immune to it all. Btw I think you sound totally normal as well, even with a hairy bum

sillysally · 01/02/2005 16:54

CosmeticJunkie - my mind must be dirtier (probably not what you might me now thinking however)

He He bozza - I bet quite a large percentage of ladies have a more "backwardsly extended" hairline than they'd care to admit I'd love to know how common it really is!

Wow HMB - your kids are in for a treat - I hope you make them discuss your argument

Aloha - I was kind of prepared for a variety of reactions to this thread. In the whole context of things, it is all a bit ridiculous to be concerned with such trite things, but I do sometimes (most of the time actually ) revel in little human dilemmas and idiosyncracies and I'm more than prepared to admit to being embarrassed and concerned by these things sometimes.

That's why no way I could be offended by anyone who may have tried to take the piss x

OP posts:
happymerryberries · 01/02/2005 16:56

You would have to define it carefully, are we talking hair all round the exit point?

sillysally · 01/02/2005 17:08

more perineal s'pose

OP posts:
mears · 01/02/2005 17:33

remingtonshaver

mears · 01/02/2005 17:35

Depends how close a shave you wnat really. Close enough for me

leahbump · 01/02/2005 21:09

anyone sill about?? Just wanted to hijack and ask...as someone who has not had a wax down there before (I used to wax my legs myself before ds..since i've been too scared!!) will it really hurt..esp as i am 13 weeks pregnant. Is it more painless with a professional?? (i.e would leg waxing be less painful in a salon?) not that i'd ever atempt to wax down there myself!
AND...how long does it last...(trying to time it right to get it done for birth also...I think dealing with postnatal piles, possibile stitches and the mess etc will be better with v little hair!!

thanks

Branster · 01/02/2005 21:24

leahbump I would not reccomend testing such activities (at home or salon) when pregnant as you might be oversensitive to pain and it would put you off trying it again after the baby arrives.
I often do it myself (legs and everything) and it doesn't hurt but when I do go to a salon for waxing I find it hurts a fair bit and am also edgy in case they get it wrong (which they wouldn't I know, but I'm stupid like that).

So I'd say stick to shaving until after the baby unless you're naturally courageous.

sillysally · 01/02/2005 21:25

Hi Leah

Have a look at my link earlier today (11.30 am), as I don't have experience myself

Thanks for the link Mears! I'll get one of those

OP posts:
Tanzie · 01/02/2005 21:36

Don't do it yourself. I did and ended up with a Mexican Hairless rather than a Brazilian!

maretta · 01/02/2005 21:39

Also, I want to know from people who've had immaculate bikini lines in labour - how did you know when to get it done. No use being a perfect brazilian at 38 weeks but a mass of in growing spikes when you go to be induced.

maretta · 01/02/2005 21:39

And what's a Mexican?

sillysally · 01/02/2005 21:42

LOL! a mexican hairless is a hairless dog, a bit like a chihuahua, from mexico

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread