Best Amazon Prime Day deals: Mumsnet favourites

Best Amazon Prime Day deals:
Mumsnet favourites

Shop now

Please or to access all these features

Other subjects

while you are up there ticking your boxes

106 replies

Cappuccino · 13/09/2007 14:07

tick 'include special needs'

OP posts:
Peachy · 13/09/2007 14:12

can I extend that?

tick special needs if you are a nice person

All nice people welcome

MrsScavoEatsJelly · 13/09/2007 14:18

Of course in include special needs. (no SN DC's of my own, .

What made you post this?

VidiVickiVENIQV · 13/09/2007 14:19

I always do.

Why would there be a backlash?

HM

Cappuccino · 13/09/2007 14:27

i post it because I really really disagreed with it being taken out of active convos in the first place

and a poll I did a while ago showed that barely anyone clicked it

and when I post with a problem with my disabled daughter I want the same breadth of support that have for my able-bodied one

and a whole load of other worthy reasons that I went on about at the time

but some mums at the time didn't agree

OP posts:
NoBiggy · 13/09/2007 14:29

Sorry, just thought it wasn't meant for me to read.

I'll include it toot-sweet.

Scoobi6 · 13/09/2007 14:34

you have to tick a box to see SN in active convos? Wouldn't it be a bit more inclusive to have all "opt-out" boxes rather than "opt-in"?

Don't see why anyone would object to SN threads appearing in active convos

Furball · 13/09/2007 14:39

for some reason I thought it said no special needs and have just realised it says include as the other boxes all say no.

southeatsastras · 13/09/2007 14:41

think it would be more user friendly to have opt out rather that in too

ComeOVeneer · 13/09/2007 14:43

I had only just noticed that it is the only one you have to opt in all the rest are opt out.

littlelapin · 13/09/2007 14:43

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Peachy · 13/09/2007 14:45

IIRC there was a time when a few posters were a bit mean to Sn threads and posted quite damning things without being aware (alledgedly) which section they were posting in- so that's why I think it happened, so that people know they have selected Sn and can take that into account.

Not sure whether that's a good or bad thing myself.

Scoobi6 · 13/09/2007 14:45

I think there is a negative connotation having it up there at all

NormaStanleyFletcher · 13/09/2007 15:01

I don't have any DCs with special needs (DS2 was born with club foot, does that count?) but have always ticked it in case there was something that I could help with, or sympathise about.

oliveoil · 13/09/2007 15:07

I always have SN as a lot of my fave MNers are on there

Pollyanna · 13/09/2007 15:08

but alot of the other SN mums still don't agree do they? I was reading a thread on DS a few days ago, which made that clear. (I have a dyspraxic ds btw and have had help from the sn board before).

Peachy · 13/09/2007 15:10

There was a ic of opinions when the selection buton happened, probably still is

MN amde the final decision iirc

Scoobi6 · 13/09/2007 15:18

I don't have any sn children but will tick from now on, as NSF says might still be able to help or offer support.

I was just that you have to tick a box to include this section of MN in the active convos search. Have been here for months and never noticed until Cappuchino brought attention to it.

MarinaLaPasionaria · 13/09/2007 15:19

Have always kept it switched on, want to keep up with all my MN pals

IdrisTheDragon · 13/09/2007 15:22

I always have 'include special needs' ticked .

funnypeculiar · 13/09/2007 15:25

always do (although rarely post)
bumping for anyone who doesn't know about this

lucyellensmum · 13/09/2007 15:50

i dont tend to do the active convo bit, just the last hour thing, but what is it with the SN thing, why wouldnt i want to read about that? I don't have a child with SN, apart from mild speech delay but i have found posts on there really interesting and informative. I can't imagine why people wouldnt want to read them. I am not interested in Style, i am not interested in food, property, recipes, products etc etc, never read the threads, but i dont expect there to be a box so i can discount them - weird

mytwopenceworth · 13/09/2007 15:53

This is why when I want to ask for advice about my kids, I don't go to the sn board, even though they are autistic. Most people don't opt in and it's good to get all parenting tips and perspectives.

I don't see why it should be either, but if it must, I think it should be opt out rather than opt in.

Dropdeadfred · 13/09/2007 15:57

sorry - i never knew you had to actively choose it, is this up for voting on again, why would we disclude that topic from active convos?

tortoisekinnockSHELL · 13/09/2007 15:57

I haven't usually had it ticked, but I will. THe reason for it being there was after a request from some of the posters who have children with SN, because of unhappiness caused by people replying to posts, not noticing which board they were on. A lot of people almost left over the sorts of replies they were getting, but this seemed to sort the problem out.

I think they were particularly worried about people who just joined, not being especially familiar with the board layout, seeing posts such as 'where can I get nappies for a 4 year old' adn replying 'just potty train them'. At least I seem to remember that being the problem.

Peachy · 13/09/2007 16:01

That was pretty much it, in a nutshell, I think.

I'm happy with whatever, I would prefer an opt out, but afaik nobody questioned it before- glad its been raised though so the newbies know (we welcome newbies one and all!)