I want to clarify my arguments here...as I am obviously in a minority and gven that I am a particulrly modest person I was prepared at the start of his thread to accept other opinions but....
When an adult has his or her genitalia handled or looked at by a medical professional, they are proteced by a chaperone...as is the doctor or nurse.
Fine...good....regardless of anyone's sex this is a good thing.
When an elderly patient who is female and my be very modest does not want a male carer, people respect that. It's thought of as fine and reasonable.
But when a child....boy or girl...is helped to go to the toilet they have no such chaperone...no protection and neither does the carer.
How is this ok?? I honestly cannot see why this is ok.
People speak of 3 year old's being "different" to elderly women with dementia...WHY? WHY can't a three year old have privacy or be protected because she or he is just as vulnerable as an elderly woman.
I am not a suspicious person...I don't look at all men and think they're perverts...but I DO think that people disregard children a lot.
Also, the people who say "Well nurseies can't afford extra staff"
f it was law then they would have to.