Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Mumsnetters with disabilities

Please see our webguide of suggested organisations for parents to support children with learning difficulties.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
70
MrsKypp · 25/06/2025 17:38

@LadyKenya

Maybe you're right that her friends helped her - I didn't go on holiday with them to Spain so I can't comment on that. They are 20 year olds and I am a middle aged Mum!

Orangesandlemons77 · 25/06/2025 17:39

Yes I think the bit about planning and following journeys relates to doing those things alone, not with support. It doesn't sound like the young person was alone..

OP posts:
TigerRag · 25/06/2025 17:39

MrsKypp · 25/06/2025 17:32

yes @Orangesandlemons77 correct.

The DD blue badge: the mother got it with the high level PIP. There was no test for the blue badge in her case.

Not if she's in England and receives the enhanced rate on planning and following a journey. I scored 12 points and still had to prove I have mobility needs

MrsKypp · 25/06/2025 17:41

PocketSand · 25/06/2025 17:38

@MrsKyppeither contact DWP and report suspected fraud (reports from medical experts may make you look demented) or give it up. Stop suggesting that proposed changes are rational based on your view.

@PocketSand

Read all my posts on this thread before writing such an incorrectly informed post.

Not once have I said the proposed changes are rational; quite the opposite in fact.

LadyKenya · 25/06/2025 17:42

Orangesandlemons77 · 25/06/2025 17:39

Yes I think the bit about planning and following journeys relates to doing those things alone, not with support. It doesn't sound like the young person was alone..

Right. So the person in question perhaps could not do those things, and needs the help to be able to do so. Hence the high award for PIP.

MrsKypp · 25/06/2025 17:42

TigerRag · 25/06/2025 17:39

Not if she's in England and receives the enhanced rate on planning and following a journey. I scored 12 points and still had to prove I have mobility needs

Yes England.

In her case she 100% definitley has no mobility needs at all.

LadyKenya · 25/06/2025 17:44

MrsKypp · 25/06/2025 17:42

Yes England.

In her case she 100% definitley has no mobility needs at all.

But it would come under the need for help planning a journey. Look at the descriptors for PIP, all the information is there. It does not mean that she has trouble walking, etc.

MrsKypp · 25/06/2025 17:45

LadyKenya · 25/06/2025 17:42

Right. So the person in question perhaps could not do those things, and needs the help to be able to do so. Hence the high award for PIP.

So someone who goes on holiday to Spain with a group of 20 year olds, travels alone by bus, goes to parties, cooks, and laughs and jokes is so severely affected by ASD that high award for both is appropriate? And a blue badge?

I won't post more because I truly didn't intend to upset anyone, simply point out that the PIP system needs to change. There are people abusing it. That money needs to go to the genuine applicants.

The govt are going about it the wrong way as I have said many times on this thread.

I am against any cuts until effective support is in place for the people affected.

There will always be some abuse of benefits.

Diagnosis and medical reports should form the majority of the assessment.

Wishing everyone all the best.

PocketSand · 25/06/2025 17:46

Even more evidence that you should report to DLA for benefit fraud if you believe that deception was involved.

MrsKypp · 25/06/2025 17:48

@PocketSand Yes maybe I should. It's not easy though, they are family members.

What I hope is that the DD leaves home and builds a good life for herself away from the mother. Time will tell.

So sorry if anyone was upset by anything I said. Truly not my intention.

PhilippaGeorgiou · 25/06/2025 17:48

I was going to post something but just deleted it due to the current direction of this thread...

@MrsKypp Please stop derailing the thread. This is for people who have disabilities - not people who want to whine about people they claim don't have disabilities. If you think there is fraud going on, report it. No disabled person will complain about reporting fraud. But you are not an assessor and do not have access to peoples personal health information. Nor do you understand what PIP descriptors are. Be very careful before you report someone that you actually are doing so with good cause.

PocketSand · 25/06/2025 17:49

If you think you have evidence that someone you know is defrauding the system you need to speak up. Otherwise you may think all other claimants are fraudulent.

PocketSand · 25/06/2025 17:52

@PhilippaGeorgiou well said

LadyKenya · 25/06/2025 17:52

MrsKypp · 25/06/2025 17:45

So someone who goes on holiday to Spain with a group of 20 year olds, travels alone by bus, goes to parties, cooks, and laughs and jokes is so severely affected by ASD that high award for both is appropriate? And a blue badge?

I won't post more because I truly didn't intend to upset anyone, simply point out that the PIP system needs to change. There are people abusing it. That money needs to go to the genuine applicants.

The govt are going about it the wrong way as I have said many times on this thread.

I am against any cuts until effective support is in place for the people affected.

There will always be some abuse of benefits.

Diagnosis and medical reports should form the majority of the assessment.

Wishing everyone all the best.

Any system is open to an element of fraud, that is true. But as people have pointed out, in this case the reasons that this young lady could have qualified, have been outlined. There seems to be an element of believing that because she can walk with no issues, that she should not have the Mobility element, or Blue Badge, even though it has been explained that there is more than one criteria for being awarded one. What I think is irrelevant about who I think should be awarded, or not. But I am just saying that there is sometimes more than meets the eye, with peoples circumstances.

Orangesandlemons77 · 25/06/2025 18:04

Does anyone know what might happen with this amendment, please?

OP posts:
cloudytime · 25/06/2025 18:11

MrsKypp · 25/06/2025 17:08

@Pocketsand I know someone personally. Actually it was her mother who claimed it for her and got high rate for both plus then a blue badge. The DD is apparently according to the Mum diagnosed ASD but evidently extremely mild. She went on holiday with friends to Spain last year, travels by bus alone / with friends, enjoys parties, etc etc I doubt many people would ever guess the DD has autism at all.

Some people lie, unfortunately. And some are very, very clever with it and know how to extort.

But I do belive the vast majority of people receiving PIP need and deserve it. There will always be a few who trick their way to get benefits, it can never be 100% watertight. And the govt should never base cut backs that will affect genuine claimants on those who are dishonest and succeed in abusing PIP.

PIP needs changing but not how they are doing it.

Edited

What country within the UK are they in?

PandoraSocks · 25/06/2025 18:30

@Mrskypp, please start a separate thead on whether or not people are scamming the system/get pip for mild autism or whatever. AIBU would be the right place.

This thread is in the section for Mumsnetters with disabilities and is aimed at those who are worried and want to share info on the progress of the bill.

Everyone, let's not let the thread be derailed. ❤️

PandoraSocks · 25/06/2025 18:33

Orangesandlemons77 · 25/06/2025 18:04

Does anyone know what might happen with this amendment, please?

If the speaker accepts the amendment, it will be debated, probably on Tuesday.

PandoraSocks · 25/06/2025 18:36

TheAutumnCrow · 25/06/2025 10:11

The other overarching thing that is worrying about PIP and the DWP is the huge extent to which policy is being driven, and has been driven for nearly fifteen years, by civil servants not ministers.

And civil servants are currently demonstrating they care not a jot about women, women with disabilities & differences, and women’s rights.

This is not true. I was a Whitehall civil servant up until recently and this really is not how things work. This reform of PIP has ministers' finger prints all over it.

But that is a discussion for another thread, not this one.

Orangesandlemons77 · 25/06/2025 18:40

PandoraSocks · 25/06/2025 18:33

If the speaker accepts the amendment, it will be debated, probably on Tuesday.

Edited

Thanks, I think the vote is also scheduled for Tuesday.

OP posts:
PandoraSocks · 25/06/2025 18:44

Orangesandlemons77 · 25/06/2025 18:40

Thanks, I think the vote is also scheduled for Tuesday.

This sets it out clearly.

guidetoprocedure.parliament.uk/collections/P4elVoYq/reasoned-amendments-to-second-or-third-reading

Orangesandlemons77 · 25/06/2025 19:00

I'm a bit confused. Why would they do the vote and the debate of the amendment all on the same day?

Would it not make more sense to look at the amendment first, as it might mean the vote doesn't go ahead?

Or have I missed something

OP posts:
PandoraSocks · 25/06/2025 19:25

Orangesandlemons77 · 25/06/2025 19:00

I'm a bit confused. Why would they do the vote and the debate of the amendment all on the same day?

Would it not make more sense to look at the amendment first, as it might mean the vote doesn't go ahead?

Or have I missed something

As I understand it, the reasoned amendments are put forward after the debate of the bill. And if voted for, the bill then can make no further progress.

I suppose it makes sense in a way in that MPs can put their views forward before a vote on whether to kill the bill or not.

PandoraSocks · 25/06/2025 19:39

Actually I should have said the reasoned amendment is voted on after the debate. The amendment is put forward as a motion at the start and then voted on after the debate. I found this on wiki which is quite helpful:

PIP cuts- what happens next?
MrsKypp · 25/06/2025 20:23

PocketSand · 25/06/2025 17:49

If you think you have evidence that someone you know is defrauding the system you need to speak up. Otherwise you may think all other claimants are fraudulent.

Yes, in all honesty ideally I would speak up yes. I did on this thread, but accept it was not the right thread to do so after reading people's advice regarding that here.

No, your second sentence is incorrect: I do have critical thinking skills.

I was going to stop posting on this thread but your post really annoyed me: the second sentence was just too ludicrous for words.

Good luck to all genuine PIP applicants and recipients. I wish you all the best.

@cloudytime England - Surrey.