Please or to access all these features

Money matters

Find financial and money-saving discussions including debt and pension chat on our Money forum. If you're looking for ways to make your money to go further, sign up to our Moneysaver emails here.

One in six PIP claimants have no extra costs linked to their disability

1000 replies

Allseeingallknowing · 15/10/2026 14:39

https://www.thesun.co.uk/money/40693771/pip-claimants-disability-benefit/
So, can money be saved here?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
Kirbert2 · 16/10/2026 10:57

ExpectMore · 16/10/2026 10:35

I think they’d be missing the point as it would presumably open up full time jobs to people that currently are restricted to PT through lack of appropriate wraparound care, thus generating an overall positive return (additional tax returns, societal contribution, mental health and well being, etc etc).

Need society to realise that some costs are good costs.

I still think you are vastly underestimating just how expensive it would be.

As I said, there's a reason parents like me get carers allowance and aren't expected to work.

BugJuice · 16/10/2026 10:59

ExpectMore · 16/10/2026 09:28

ok sorry I didn’t explicitly mean it needs to be one session combined. Charity if that appropriate then can have separate for kids that need some extra help. With that work?

My son would need specially trained 1:1 care at after school club/holiday club. I have no idea how much that would cost, as I’m yet to find a single provider who can offer it in my area.

Moonbourbon · 16/10/2026 11:02

AnswerIsNo · 16/10/2026 09:22

lol any sentence that starts with "I thought I’d ask chatGPT" usually indicates the person themselves has zero expertise in the subject matter and has limited ability to QA the outputs of a piece of internet-bolt on code...

that, due to market interests, was deliberately released into the wild before addressing the fundamental issue that it hallucinates in attempt to interpolate missing information, references completely irrelevant sources with absolute conviction, or often mangles raw input data

have you sense-checked the outputs?

or are you trusting the graph because it looks nice?

and all the above assumes you've not mistakenly fed it bad data...

and the obvious follow up is please provide a link to the official sources of input data used

The source is at the foot of the graph.

Chatgpt is a really useful tool to quickly create graphs using accurate data. It’s a tool that helps the masses to make sense of complex information. It is also a serious tool used by a range of experts in various fields.

To put it on a par with reading information in tabloid newspapers shows that person doesn’t understand statistical validity, significance, data science, coding or perhaps the whole world of computing science.

Moonbourbon · 16/10/2026 11:04

AnswerIsNo · 16/10/2026 10:08

here's the thing, the steep red line for PIP looks nice and all

yet you've not provided any commentary, including the simultaneous drop in DLA, due to on-going phase-out via transfer over

also, the overall spend rate increased from 2020, what major global health event that left many with long-term complications happened between 2020-21?

it began with C and no, I don't mean the UK's rising cocaine epidemic

An explanation for a trend is not proof that a trend ought to continue unabated

ExpectMore · 16/10/2026 11:06

Kirbert2 · 16/10/2026 10:57

I still think you are vastly underestimating just how expensive it would be.

As I said, there's a reason parents like me get carers allowance and aren't expected to work.

Possibly. I guess the logic I’m using is that if you’re able to look after your child (ie 1 person) then presumably the cost would be equivalent to 1 person for the duration of the session? So say £50/hour for the duration of the session. Clearly there’s be the cost of any necessary adaptations (but presumably they’d already be there if in school setting?) and consumables.

Constantrunner · 16/10/2026 11:06

emuloc · 16/10/2026 09:38

How do you know that they are not trying to get help? Did they explicitly say that?Do you have any idea how difficult it is to access MH services? The waiting list alone, is a barrier to getting any actual help. People get sicker, just waiting for treatment.

Personality disorders are not treatable

ExpectMore · 16/10/2026 11:08

BugJuice · 16/10/2026 10:59

My son would need specially trained 1:1 care at after school club/holiday club. I have no idea how much that would cost, as I’m yet to find a single provider who can offer it in my area.

so I’d apply the same logic per my PP which your post seems to validate, he’d need 1 person full time.

The market will respond and more services providers will materialise as the need becomes established.

AmberTigerEyes · 16/10/2026 11:10

Moonbourbon · 16/10/2026 11:04

An explanation for a trend is not proof that a trend ought to continue unabated

Most of what they posted shows that there is no steep upward trend.

ExpectMore · 16/10/2026 11:10

FalseSpring · 16/10/2026 10:56

That's the point. Those that can work should, but rather than a cash benefit they should be given tax relief amounting to the same in cash terms.

The ability to work is unrelated to mobility. Those that can work should, but in recognition of the extra costs they incur, they should get extra tax allowances. In theory it should incentivise the disabled to find jobs that suit them and build careers.

I appreciate that not everyone can work, and in my view cash benefits should be limited to those that really can't even do a few hours a week from home. I suspect that is a much smaller number than those currently claiming PIP. I think we would also see improvements in MH if sufferers felt they were contributing in some way to society and not being a drain on it. It is very depressing in itself to be looking at a life on benefits.

Changing the subject, where I grew up, there were extra tax allowances for families with children etc. I think this is a much better approach than providing UC for working families that in my view just suppresses wages. We need to allow people wherever possible to pull themselves out of poverty through hard work, not through the current benefit system.

This is very similar to the French model which I think works well (perhaps you even grew up there!).

gamerchick · 16/10/2026 11:11

Moonbourbon · 16/10/2026 08:25

I think this calls trend calls a few things into question

From around 2022, has there suddenly been an increase in disability?

Given there are posters here saying they would be suicidal or their lives would be ruined if they didn’t get pip, what was happening to the same sets of people back in the 70s and 80s? There were periods back then when the cost of living was dire, such as when interest rates and mortgage rates skyrocketed.

I would argue the current trend is unsustainable. We’re looking at massive tax increases on ordinary working people (the argument about taxing the rich doesn’t add up because there are relatively few of them) at the same time as reductions in spending on infrastructure like roads, schools, defence.

I would hypothesise it’s the trend that people worry about, rather than the spend right now. Where does it end? How far will the ordinary taxpayer’s taxes need to rise to pay for this? The fact that the government is committed to continuing with the status quo means the inevitable will happen - taxpayers crushed under an unbelievable burden of tax. The prospect is frightening for the ordinary working mums posting on here. No amount of special pleading will take away their fear of the impending misery of seeing increasingly more wages confiscated when they desperately wanted to spend time with their children anyway.

Back.in the 70s/80s families had more of a village to divvy the shit. It was also very common for only one member of the household needing to work. Usually the men. Households could survive on one Income.

Comparing life now to back then can make a person look quite ignorant tbh.

emuloc · 16/10/2026 11:12

Constantrunner · 16/10/2026 11:06

Personality disorders are not treatable

Ok, I have learnt something, I hope the poster I was replying too, reads your post, seeing as they are assuming a lot, about some posters with MH difficulties.

AmberTigerEyes · 16/10/2026 11:12

Constantrunner · 16/10/2026 11:06

Personality disorders are not treatable

They are not curable, but some PDs can be treated for improvement in quality of life. For example, EUPD can be treated with DBT and bespoke CBT plus psycho-social interventions.

BugJuice · 16/10/2026 11:14

ExpectMore · 16/10/2026 11:08

so I’d apply the same logic per my PP which your post seems to validate, he’d need 1 person full time.

The market will respond and more services providers will materialise as the need becomes established.

That would be absolutely brilliant. I was earning £90k per year before being forced to leave work to care for my child and take a 2 hour a day, term time only job. If the market could respond before he reaches adulthood that would be great, although he will still need full time 1:1 care as an adult too. He also only sleeps 3 hours a night (meaning that I do too), so I’d need some overnight 1:1 care to be able to go back to my previous demanding role, but I’d absolutely love to!

roaringdragon · 16/10/2026 11:15

SEN sessions don’t work for all DC with SEN.

Assuming the ratio of care would be 1:1 because parents care for DC alone is flawed. Social care/ICBs regularly expect parents to manage with 1:1 (or a lower ratio of care if they have other DC) yet acknowledge carers/PAs/school staff need a higher ratio. DS1&3 both have 2:1 care as part of their EOTIS packages and social care/ICB funded care, except we are expected to manage without. We aren’t rare in that regard.

Kirbert2 · 16/10/2026 11:21

ExpectMore · 16/10/2026 11:06

Possibly. I guess the logic I’m using is that if you’re able to look after your child (ie 1 person) then presumably the cost would be equivalent to 1 person for the duration of the session? So say £50/hour for the duration of the session. Clearly there’s be the cost of any necessary adaptations (but presumably they’d already be there if in school setting?) and consumables.

My son actually has 2:1 at school. They would also need some medical training in my son's case. He's complex.

I look after him by myself because I'm his parent and that's just what you have to do as a parent to a child with complex needs.

fridaynightzzz · 16/10/2026 11:21

DH had an aunt who had Down’s syndrome and lived with her mother then siblings (whose life and health was ruined) before ending up in supportive housing. They helped apply for full PIP for her. Her relatives lived in poverty and didn’t know about benefits etc when they were introduced.
She got healthcare a generation before she wouldn’t have gotten and would have died much earlier than her mid 60s.
This isn’t a type of society we should go back to. Her relatives became disabled herself from the strain and the poverty.

Moonbourbon · 16/10/2026 11:26

AnswerIsNo · 16/10/2026 10:36

yes and what do you think is the standard procedure when dealing with a large sample size of data where the true associated variables are unknown and impractical to obtain?

assumptions
averages
coefficients
scaling factors

depending on which you choose and how you go about it, can be wildly inaccurate, unless someone bothers to do the hard yards and calibrates their table of condition-specific adjustments against a reliable sample size of real families

Have you read the report or looked into the citations? The data is from the Department for Work and Pensions, NatCen Social Research. (2021). Family Resources Survey. It’s a survey of 20k households.

Also, the fact that everyone here is quibbling about the fact that teenagers don’t know their disability costs ignores the fact that a large proportion of adults also reported no extra costs.

If we look at the table presented in the report and focus on adults aged 35-44, we can see those reporting no extra costs are 17% + 4% of that age group. That’s roughly 1 in 5 recipients in that age group.

One in six PIP claimants have no extra costs linked to their disability
Moonbourbon · 16/10/2026 11:28

gamerchick · 16/10/2026 11:11

Back.in the 70s/80s families had more of a village to divvy the shit. It was also very common for only one member of the household needing to work. Usually the men. Households could survive on one Income.

Comparing life now to back then can make a person look quite ignorant tbh.

I take your comments. All valid and noted. Except the one at the end where you say I’m ignorant.

Moonbourbon · 16/10/2026 11:30

The report itself is an interesting and balanced read. Of note, it cites that a large proportion of recipients cite the use of PIP for the general cost of living, something the report rightly states was not the purpose of the benefit.

Kirbert2 · 16/10/2026 11:31

gamerchick · 16/10/2026 11:11

Back.in the 70s/80s families had more of a village to divvy the shit. It was also very common for only one member of the household needing to work. Usually the men. Households could survive on one Income.

Comparing life now to back then can make a person look quite ignorant tbh.

Not to mention the fact that more people are also surviving now due to things like medical advancements.

Back in the 70s/80s, my son very likely wouldn't have survived in the first place.

gamerchick · 16/10/2026 11:33

Moonbourbon · 16/10/2026 11:28

I take your comments. All valid and noted. Except the one at the end where you say I’m ignorant.

I didn't say you were.

BallerinaFall · 16/10/2026 11:35

Mine goes on private physio for something I was signed off the nhs from 2 years ago but actually needs preventative work on twice monthly, I also pay for the mental health support I need because I am autistic and the NHS give me neurotypical therapy for 10 sessions based on a mental health profile I dont have and then wonder why im in crisis months later and referred back - so I use a neurodiversity therapist/coach which has been beneficial. I cant drive so I have to pay £6 for a return ticket to my nearby town if I have a gp appointment. When im in autistic burnout I physically cant do anything so I use some of this to pay for a tesco whoosh delivery. I have been able to buy loops for my ears - and other adjustments like that sunglasses because I cant bear the light - not expensive ones £6 pants from Tesco. I can pay for my prescriptions and also use the money for fitness, I pay a local fitness person in my village as a pt because it would cost me £6 a trip to get to the local gym so I price adjust to make it to somewhere I can walk to in my village, personal gym so I can work out, I can leave my house.

I live alone as an autistic woman with adhd. Is this OK? If I have any spare money I put it aside in case of an unexpected bill or save it towards another thing that would support or benefit me. Ie I did a webinar about autism and learnt new skills. I might buy a book on how to deal with the disability better.

gamerchick · 16/10/2026 11:35

Kirbert2 · 16/10/2026 11:31

Not to mention the fact that more people are also surviving now due to things like medical advancements.

Back in the 70s/80s, my son very likely wouldn't have survived in the first place.

Edited

Mine would have been put in an institution because of infant psychosis. Which is what autism was called back in the day.

AnswerIsNo · 16/10/2026 12:12

Moonbourbon · 16/10/2026 11:02

The source is at the foot of the graph.

Chatgpt is a really useful tool to quickly create graphs using accurate data. It’s a tool that helps the masses to make sense of complex information. It is also a serious tool used by a range of experts in various fields.

To put it on a par with reading information in tabloid newspapers shows that person doesn’t understand statistical validity, significance, data science, coding or perhaps the whole world of computing science.

You've made no commentary on what drove the rise in PIP, commensurate with the reduction in DLA, or the fact the further rate of change in PIP costs occurred during and after the pandemic - due to direct impacts of COVID itself on a sub-population of 70 million and/or existing claimants, where it may have exacerbated existing conditions, along with the psychological impact

To put it on a par with reading information in tabloid newspapers shows that person doesn’t understand statistical validity, significance, data science, coding or perhaps the whole world of computing science.

Epic. You could not be more mistaken if you tried and if you think I am going to out myself here, you're sorely mistaken.

Lesson 1: Never underestimate your opponent

As for to put it on par with reading information in tabloid newspapers, that's you being disingenuous, or seeing things that aren't there...and therefore that person can no longer be trusted to parse and present the information in a trustworthy manner 😎

plasticplate · 16/10/2026 12:22

ExpectMore · 16/10/2026 11:08

so I’d apply the same logic per my PP which your post seems to validate, he’d need 1 person full time.

The market will respond and more services providers will materialise as the need becomes established.

My son requires 3:1 with specialist training. The market wouldn't respond to this as many children with this level of need don't even have a school place nevermind any social care provision. Many children requiring 2:1 support now struggle to get provision.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.