Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Money matters

Find financial and money-saving discussions including debt and pension chat on our Money forum. If you're looking for ways to make your money to go further, sign up to our Moneysaver emails here.

Do all 18 years old go on UC if they cannot find a job

1000 replies

Crystalovertherainbow · 01/02/2026 20:52

Do the family needs to show their income or the new adult is considered their own financial unit now , even if they live with the parents and their UC is given them

OP posts:
Playingvideogames · 02/02/2026 16:35

I find the idea of an able bodied school leaver immediately signing on benefits to be disgraceful. It really shouldn’t be allowed.

Bromptotoo · 02/02/2026 16:36

Needmorelego · 02/02/2026 16:33

If the partner doesn't earn enough for the family to live then she would be expected to be also working or seeking work.
At least I believe that's correct.
Or presumably every SAHP would be claiming UC 🤷

Edited

Bit more complicated I think.

Earnings thresholds have been raised significantly in recent years but until recently it was possible to be on light touch one one set of wages.

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 02/02/2026 16:37

Jiwdf · 02/02/2026 15:44

Buy a computer then. It's a worthwhile investment. You can get some for circa £100. I know someone who paid for their computer in monthly installments.

Normal WiFi is enough. If you want you can use mobile data hotspot.

I can program in five languages and work with computers in three operating systems connected to laboratory equipment for my job.

You don't even understand the difference between the fibre outside the house and the wifi inside it. Wifi connected to ADSL can be little better than dialup if you are a long way from the exchange. Generally, places with crap ADSL are also mobile deadzones. Ask me how I know this...

You will not get a computer capable of a business workload for £100.

Needmorelego · 02/02/2026 16:37

Playingvideogames · 02/02/2026 16:35

I find the idea of an able bodied school leaver immediately signing on benefits to be disgraceful. It really shouldn’t be allowed.

Just because they are "able bodied" doesn't mean they don't have to eat and pay bills.
The whole point of this thread is for 18 year olds who haven't found employment.
Able bodied makes no difference.

Playingvideogames · 02/02/2026 16:38

scottishgirl69 · 02/02/2026 16:27

Of course they can. Millions of pounds of benefits go unclaimed every year. If the government taxed the super wealthy then there would be less of an issue. If the UK government can fund wars and sent billions overseas they can fund the benefits bill

Edited

Oh yawn. We can’t be a country of high unemployment and benefit claiming propped up by a couple of highly taxed billionaires. This is so boring now

scottishgirl69 · 02/02/2026 16:38

Playingvideogames · 02/02/2026 16:35

I find the idea of an able bodied school leaver immediately signing on benefits to be disgraceful. It really shouldn’t be allowed.

Why shouldn't it be allowed. It's been allowed for decades. It only seems to provoke outrage now the Internet is here. People have every right to claim UC on leaving school until they find a job

Boomer55 · 02/02/2026 16:39

TeenLifeMum · 01/02/2026 21:25

I’m stunned that it’s seen as the norm by some that dc living at home would claim UC while looking for a job. Benefits are a safety net.

And me. My kids already had “part time jobs” and just increased their hours until they got more “career” jobs.

Living off of the taxpayer wasn’t an option - they’d never paid in anything, no reason they should get out. 🤷‍♀️

scottishgirl69 · 02/02/2026 16:39

Playingvideogames · 02/02/2026 16:38

Oh yawn. We can’t be a country of high unemployment and benefit claiming propped up by a couple of highly taxed billionaires. This is so boring now

Same as you - yawn.

Megifer · 02/02/2026 16:40

Playingvideogames · 02/02/2026 16:35

I find the idea of an able bodied school leaver immediately signing on benefits to be disgraceful. It really shouldn’t be allowed.

Why not? They have bills to pay, clothes needed, (hopefully) interviews to travel to....

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 02/02/2026 16:41

Jiwdf · 02/02/2026 16:22

The main thing is personal responsibility.

You should be responsible for your own life and not rely on the taxpayer and the state. Taxation is implicitly taken under force and threat of state violence.

Oh. An "all tax is theft" libertarian. I should have guessed.

I hope you don't use any of the roads my taxes paid for to get to and from work. You would be a massive hypocrite if you did.

scottishgirl69 · 02/02/2026 16:41

It's ok for disabled young people to claim benefits but not able bodied ones - why don't we just bring back national service and be done with it eh. Or have folk sweep the streets?

Some poorer families need that extra income. How many times does this need to be said?

Playingvideogames · 02/02/2026 16:42

Needmorelego · 02/02/2026 16:37

Just because they are "able bodied" doesn't mean they don't have to eat and pay bills.
The whole point of this thread is for 18 year olds who haven't found employment.
Able bodied makes no difference.

Let me tell you about a pattern I see time, and time, and time again at work (where people explain their financial circumstances and background history on a regular basis).

18 year old leaves school
They might work for a bit - usually something part time, or low paid. They’re still living at home.
They get fired or quit.
They sign on benefits.
They’re still at home so it’s £350 a month to doss about with.
They spend it on takeaways, vapes, weed, alcohol, whatever.
They spend months abusing the above, lying in bed and having no proper routine.
They become lazy, addicted and entitled.
After a few years they’re basically unemployable and the path to addling their brains has started.
A few years after that they get diagnosed with a ton of MH and addiction related conditions, because they haven’t done a single healthy ir productive thing in years.
They claim PIP, and then try to claim carer’s for each other (if in a relationship at that point).
They have kids, more benefits.
Kids get SEN diagnosis - DLA
They’re quids in. And they’ve never worked.

What would’ve happened had we never gave them benefits to start with?

Playingvideogames · 02/02/2026 16:43

scottishgirl69 · 02/02/2026 16:41

It's ok for disabled young people to claim benefits but not able bodied ones - why don't we just bring back national service and be done with it eh. Or have folk sweep the streets?

Some poorer families need that extra income. How many times does this need to be said?

‘Why not make people work for their money!’ You said hysterically, like it’s not… just basic logic and not at all a human rights infringement

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 02/02/2026 16:43

Playingvideogames · 02/02/2026 16:38

Oh yawn. We can’t be a country of high unemployment and benefit claiming propped up by a couple of highly taxed billionaires. This is so boring now

Land value tax is the only fair tax. And the rich can't dodge it, because land cannot be taken overseas.

scottishgirl69 · 02/02/2026 16:43

Boomer55 · 02/02/2026 16:39

And me. My kids already had “part time jobs” and just increased their hours until they got more “career” jobs.

Living off of the taxpayer wasn’t an option - they’d never paid in anything, no reason they should get out. 🤷‍♀️

Some people aren't in that position at 18. They don't have a part time job - are people supposed to claim nothing just because they haven't paid taxes yet?

Playingvideogames · 02/02/2026 16:44

selffellatingouroborosofhate · 02/02/2026 16:43

Land value tax is the only fair tax. And the rich can't dodge it, because land cannot be taken overseas.

Why should people have to pay tax on their already taxed land to pay for the feckless and lazy?

scottishgirl69 · 02/02/2026 16:44

Playingvideogames · 02/02/2026 16:43

‘Why not make people work for their money!’ You said hysterically, like it’s not… just basic logic and not at all a human rights infringement

I actually really pity you with those views - seriously.

Playingvideogames · 02/02/2026 16:44

scottishgirl69 · 02/02/2026 16:43

Some people aren't in that position at 18. They don't have a part time job - are people supposed to claim nothing just because they haven't paid taxes yet?

Yes.

Playingvideogames · 02/02/2026 16:45

scottishgirl69 · 02/02/2026 16:44

I actually really pity you with those views - seriously.

Pity me all you like, I don’t care

scottishgirl69 · 02/02/2026 16:45

Playingvideogames · 02/02/2026 16:44

Why should people have to pay tax on their already taxed land to pay for the feckless and lazy?

And there we have it. You think all people on benefits are feckless and lazy - bingo!

scottishgirl69 · 02/02/2026 16:46

Playingvideogames · 02/02/2026 16:45

Pity me all you like, I don’t care

I do pity you. I would pity anyone who thinks all people who claim benefits are feckless

Dgll · 02/02/2026 16:47

scottishgirl69 · 02/02/2026 16:27

Of course they can. Millions of pounds of benefits go unclaimed every year. If the government taxed the super wealthy then there would be less of an issue. If the UK government can fund wars and sent billions overseas they can fund the benefits bill

Edited

You do realise there isn't a big pot of money sitting around full of unclaimed benefits. There is however a massive national debt that currently costs tax payers £121billion pounds a year just to pay the interest on. That amount gets keeps getting bigger every year.

To put it into context, overseas aid is about £7billion. The welfare bill is around £260 billion, or £350 billion if you include state pensions. That is before we get started on the NHS.

Meanwhile, the number of billionaires living in the country is steadily declining.

Playingvideogames · 02/02/2026 16:47

scottishgirl69 · 02/02/2026 16:46

I do pity you. I would pity anyone who thinks all people who claim benefits are feckless

I didn’t say all people. But a significant minority/majority are.

scottishgirl69 · 02/02/2026 16:48

Dgll · 02/02/2026 16:47

You do realise there isn't a big pot of money sitting around full of unclaimed benefits. There is however a massive national debt that currently costs tax payers £121billion pounds a year just to pay the interest on. That amount gets keeps getting bigger every year.

To put it into context, overseas aid is about £7billion. The welfare bill is around £260 billion, or £350 billion if you include state pensions. That is before we get started on the NHS.

Meanwhile, the number of billionaires living in the country is steadily declining.

Thanks for the stats

Playingvideogames · 02/02/2026 16:48

Dgll · 02/02/2026 16:47

You do realise there isn't a big pot of money sitting around full of unclaimed benefits. There is however a massive national debt that currently costs tax payers £121billion pounds a year just to pay the interest on. That amount gets keeps getting bigger every year.

To put it into context, overseas aid is about £7billion. The welfare bill is around £260 billion, or £350 billion if you include state pensions. That is before we get started on the NHS.

Meanwhile, the number of billionaires living in the country is steadily declining.

They live in fantasyland. I admire your efforts but they’ll just trot out about ‘billionaires’

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.