Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Money matters

Find financial and money-saving discussions including debt and pension chat on our Money forum. If you're looking for ways to make your money to go further, sign up to our Moneysaver emails here.

Do all 18 years old go on UC if they cannot find a job

1000 replies

Crystalovertherainbow · 01/02/2026 20:52

Do the family needs to show their income or the new adult is considered their own financial unit now , even if they live with the parents and their UC is given them

OP posts:
Antiquerosegold · 05/02/2026 11:26

gamerchick · 05/02/2026 10:41

The state pension makes up most of the welfare bill.

So if you did away with UC, we would still have a bloated welfare bill that would have to be paid for.

So morally, nobody should claim state pension either. It's being paid for by taxpayers. It's not coming out of a savings pot.

Edited

OK. So you want state pension and all other benefits phased out.

in that scenario the tax payer would save money and could put the saving into a private pension. Is that morally ok.

Littlegreenbauble · 05/02/2026 11:36

I think it makes them take responsibility. Off you go to the job centre then. Work with the work coach. It's society. They need to join it. You risk colluding with their worklessness if you fund their staying at home no work no education.

1apenny2apenny · 05/02/2026 11:50

The state pension is paid for by NI contributions, lack of proper planning by successive governments has meant the current amount paid out is large compared to those paying tax. If you do away with the state pension for those within even the smallest funds it will almost certainly be worth living your life and retiring with nothing to get pension credit AB’s the associated benefits.

There is not an expectation or law that states parents should support their children once they reach 18. The fact they have to when they go to uni is another grad tax in effect.

Most parents with means will support their children, we are, but they would definitely claim if we weren’t as well off. I read somewhere that paying your child’s uni fees was classed as a gift and could be taxed as such. I wonder when we’ll find out that supporting your child/children is a taxable gift. Nothing would surprise me with this bunch.

Bromptotoo · 05/02/2026 11:51

Antiquerosegold · 05/02/2026 10:35

The difference is state pension is based on your working life contribution, universal credit isn't.

I would be supportive of universal credit only for those who have contributed. Giving an 18 year universal credit so they can go to interviews is ridiculous. Previous generations managed and also those in between jobs.

How long ago did previous generations 'manage'?

I claimed Supp Ben between leaving school in summer 1978 and taking up employment the following October.

Jiwdf · 05/02/2026 11:54

scottishgirl69 · 05/02/2026 10:55

For the same reason that if your eldest lost their job they would be entitled to claim benefits. I really don't think you see how offensive it is that you are calling people who claim UC thieves

My eldest is financially responsible and has £20k plus saved up. If he'd lost this job he'd try damn damn hard to find employment again. We'd help him as well. In the meantime he'd return to tutoring.

Bromptotoo · 05/02/2026 11:57

Jiwdf · 05/02/2026 11:54

My eldest is financially responsible and has £20k plus saved up. If he'd lost this job he'd try damn damn hard to find employment again. We'd help him as well. In the meantime he'd return to tutoring.

And would he claim Job Seekers while looking for work?

scottishgirl69 · 05/02/2026 11:58

That's not the position many people are in. Not everyone can save 20k when they are in employment. Lots of people try hard to get work - it doesn't mean they get a job quickly. You really seem to hate the thought of anyone claiming benefits on any level.

You would help him - some families can't help their adult kids

scottishgirl69 · 05/02/2026 11:59

Bromptotoo · 05/02/2026 11:57

And would he claim Job Seekers while looking for work?

He wouldn't qualify with 20k in the bank

Playingvideogames · 05/02/2026 12:08

scottishgirl69 · 05/02/2026 11:58

That's not the position many people are in. Not everyone can save 20k when they are in employment. Lots of people try hard to get work - it doesn't mean they get a job quickly. You really seem to hate the thought of anyone claiming benefits on any level.

You would help him - some families can't help their adult kids

Benefits are money taken from working people to give to those who cannot work

Not a rainy day fund to assist people’s convenience, divorces and ‘mental health breaks’

scottishgirl69 · 05/02/2026 12:15

Playingvideogames · 05/02/2026 12:08

Benefits are money taken from working people to give to those who cannot work

Not a rainy day fund to assist people’s convenience, divorces and ‘mental health breaks’

None of those scenarios apply to the post that I was responding to - what was being discussed was someone who might lose their job. What does that have to do with divorces. Mental health breaks and "convenience"..

Living on 316 - 400 pounds a month hardly translates to a rainy day fund

Ps. I worked full time for over 25 years - I do know how the system works

Benefits are for people who are unemployed. If people cannot work due to health reasons they can claim disability benefits

Bromptotoo · 05/02/2026 12:15

scottishgirl69 · 05/02/2026 11:59

He wouldn't qualify with 20k in the bank

Was waiting for a bite on that!!

He would.

New Style Job Seekers is not means tested. It does however require claimants to have paid, or been credited with, National Insurance Contributions in two qualifying years. Those are currently 2023/4 and 2024/5.

Bromptotoo · 05/02/2026 12:16

Playingvideogames · 05/02/2026 12:08

Benefits are money taken from working people to give to those who cannot work

Not a rainy day fund to assist people’s convenience, divorces and ‘mental health breaks’

You do know haw many people claim Universal Credit while working don't you.

scottishgirl69 · 05/02/2026 12:18

Bromptotoo · 05/02/2026 12:15

Was waiting for a bite on that!!

He would.

New Style Job Seekers is not means tested. It does however require claimants to have paid, or been credited with, National Insurance Contributions in two qualifying years. Those are currently 2023/4 and 2024/5.

I wasnt trying to bite. I had forgotten about contribution based JSA

scottishgirl69 · 05/02/2026 12:18

Bromptotoo · 05/02/2026 12:16

You do know haw many people claim Universal Credit while working don't you.

2.2 million as far as I'm aware

Playingvideogames · 05/02/2026 12:24

Bromptotoo · 05/02/2026 12:16

You do know haw many people claim Universal Credit while working don't you.

Yes - less than half. Most don’t work.

Playingvideogames · 05/02/2026 12:24

scottishgirl69 · 05/02/2026 12:15

None of those scenarios apply to the post that I was responding to - what was being discussed was someone who might lose their job. What does that have to do with divorces. Mental health breaks and "convenience"..

Living on 316 - 400 pounds a month hardly translates to a rainy day fund

Ps. I worked full time for over 25 years - I do know how the system works

Benefits are for people who are unemployed. If people cannot work due to health reasons they can claim disability benefits

Edited

When you’re lazing around at mum and dad’s all day it’s just spending money.

I see this IRL all the time

user405927 · 05/02/2026 12:26

user405927 · 01/02/2026 21:28

Mine did and it was actually really useful. She had to add every job she applied for on her online diary so it pushed her into looking for more jobs. It’s quite relentless just applying and applying and being rejected so at least there was some structure and accountability as she had to tell her ‘coach’ what she had been doing that week.

Also she had sessions with a woman from the National Careers service who helped her with her CV and gave her loads of advice.

I posted this right at the beginning of this thread and I've just had a text from my dd to say that she has had a job offer this morning.
Using the CV the National Careers service helped her with and the interview techniques from her coach. It's the job of her dreams.

Bromptotoo · 05/02/2026 12:26

scottishgirl69 · 05/02/2026 12:18

I wasnt trying to bite. I had forgotten about contribution based JSA

I meant I was waiting for a bit on my baited hook!!

scottishgirl69 · 05/02/2026 12:26

Playingvideogames · 05/02/2026 12:24

When you’re lazing around at mum and dad’s all day it’s just spending money.

I see this IRL all the time

Knowing a few people who laze around on UC doesn't represent an entire population of benefits claimants

Playingvideogames · 05/02/2026 12:27

scottishgirl69 · 05/02/2026 12:26

Knowing a few people who laze around on UC doesn't represent an entire population of benefits claimants

I rarely see a person on benefits that isn’t on them long term and lives a chaotic lifestyle.

Needmorelego · 05/02/2026 12:31

Playingvideogames · 05/02/2026 12:27

I rarely see a person on benefits that isn’t on them long term and lives a chaotic lifestyle.

That will be a different set of benefits to the £300 a school leaver can get.
If a person is on long term benefits they will be more than just a "job seeker".

Playingvideogames · 05/02/2026 12:31

Needmorelego · 05/02/2026 12:31

That will be a different set of benefits to the £300 a school leaver can get.
If a person is on long term benefits they will be more than just a "job seeker".

No, they’re on UC long term and ‘looking for work’. Alongside PIP, of course - always PIP, for ADHD and autism.

scottishgirl69 · 05/02/2026 12:32

Do you mean young people or anyone? I know lots of people who are on UC and who are studying. I also know people who have kids who claim UC because they aren't in work and their partner does and claim either to get NI credits - none of these people live a chaotic lifestyle.

I have worked with plenty of young people who do live chaotic lifestyles - but there are multiple reasons for that - not just being on benefits

scottishgirl69 · 05/02/2026 12:34

Playingvideogames · 05/02/2026 12:31

No, they’re on UC long term and ‘looking for work’. Alongside PIP, of course - always PIP, for ADHD and autism.

Does that bother you? If I were someone in a professional job working with people on benefits and had the attitudes you seem to have about benefit claimants, I would consider doing something else

nearlylovemyusername · 05/02/2026 12:34

Bromptotoo · 05/02/2026 12:16

You do know haw many people claim Universal Credit while working don't you.

37% of the people on Universal Credit were in employment in December 2024

Universal Credit statistics, 29 April 2013 to 9 January 2025 - GOV.UK

ETA: 42% of UC claimants have ‘no work requirements’, leaving at least 58% of claimants with work requirements, means 21% of claimants are unemployed with no legitimate reason, which is just under 1.6m people. Of those 37% who were in employment we don't know if it's full time or 16/30 hours.

Even assuming this 21% "only" get £300/month and not a penny in other benefits (no childcare support, free prescriptions, housing support etc), just bare £300/months, it costs taxpayer just under £5.7b pa. These are £5.7b which could have been spend on education, police etc.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread