Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Money matters

Find financial and money-saving discussions including debt and pension chat on our Money forum. If you're looking for ways to make your money to go further, sign up to our Moneysaver emails here.

Am I in big trouble??

202 replies

Bigcoat1 · 28/12/2025 23:47

Hi Everyone,

i think I might be in big trouble. My mum passed recently. For the last 4 or 5 years I held power of attorney and handled all of her financial affairs. We never had a formal diagnosis of dementia etc, however she became Increasingly confused so I just took over.
mum was quite well off with around 150k in savings, an income of 2k per month and a mortgage free home. My finances have been difficult since my divorce.
On a few occasions I borrowed from mom’s account when I was desperate. I always paid the money back asap. I never discussed this with mum although I know she she would have consented.
her affairs are now being looked over as part of private etc and I’m terrified that this roll come to light and I’ll be in huge trouble.
I know I can’t undo what’s been done, but what should I expect to happen?

OP posts:
Neveranynamesleft · 29/12/2025 11:50

Have you posted about this before, quite recently??

Sam9769 · 29/12/2025 11:50

It's not theft if you repaid it! Stop worrying!
You paid it back. If questioned, say it was a loan and nothing will come of this!

noidea69 · 29/12/2025 11:50

This exact same thread was definitely posted earlier in the month.

rainbowunicorn · 29/12/2025 11:50

BlackCat14 · 29/12/2025 10:47

No one will know you didn’t ask, dont worry!

Of course they will. The very fact that OP had POA meant that the person that they would have to ask did not have the capacity to understand the question and agree to anything. If it is being investigated as part of probate or by the office of the public guardian then it will most likely be discovered that OP was using her mum's bank account as a personal loan service.

Aluna · 29/12/2025 11:51

It’s definitely against the rules of financial PoA, but if you document everything now on a spreadsheet - all loans and repayment dates - then you’re not likely to get into trouble.

PinkSparklyPussyCat · 29/12/2025 11:52

The very fact that OP had POA meant that the person that they would have to ask did not have the capacity to understand the question and agree to anything.

Not necessarily. I had POA for DM and she had full capacity right up until when she was hospitalised a week before she died. I was still able to manage her accounts

EyeLevelStick · 29/12/2025 11:53

Weekmindedfool · 29/12/2025 11:21

Yes but if a lasting POA was in effect for financial decisions with you as trustee you were ultimately making the decisions irrespective of her input. In that situation if you paid yourself a loan from her account even with her consent you were breaking the law. If she was capable of making decisions then the POA should not have been effected. You cant have it both ways.

Obviously attorneys can’t help themselves to money, even if they pay it back, apart from small gift sums in keeping with the donor’s normal pattern of gift giving. I never said or implied otherwise.

However, I was replying to a PP who said POA only takes effect once someone does not have capacity.

This is not true.

POA can be used at the request of someone who does have capacity but can’t for some reason undertake the necessary financial tasks.

EyeLevelStick · 29/12/2025 11:55

rainbowunicorn · 29/12/2025 11:47

Did you have an official POA? Issued bybthe office of the Public Guardian? POA for financial or welfare matters is for using when the person lacks the capacity to make their own decisions. It dosent sound like that was the case for you?

Yes. You are wrong.

rainbowunicorn · 29/12/2025 11:56

DeftWasp · 29/12/2025 11:12

No,

Firstly a dementia diagnosis does not immediately mean a person lacks capacity - there is no way to prove she didn't OK you borrowing the money

and second, assuming it was all paid back there can be no question of anything untoward.

What they will be looking at is primarily the state of her finances now, and if its a council assessment, taking a cursory look back for any major expenses that could be classed as deprivation of assets.

Assuming the money was put back, you have nothing to worry about.

But in general it's best to be 100% transparent when acting as a POA (as I do for my mum) and keep everything separate and keep a log as to what was spent and why.

It is really simple. If you are the trustee of someones affairs by means of a POA you cannot under any circumstances use it as a loan to yourself unless it was explicitly written into the POA at the time it was written.

Aluna · 29/12/2025 11:57

HelpMeGetThrough · 29/12/2025 11:52

Yes. It’s specifically against the rules. However point:

4 Attorneys must keep detailed records and accounts of all transactions and be able to prove they managed the donor’s property responsibly

Means that if she documents it all clearly now and there is no loss to DM’s estate, she may not get in trouble.

rainbowunicorn · 29/12/2025 11:58

Bigcoat1 · 29/12/2025 11:14

Thanks for posts. I’ll try and answer all questions here….

so I’ve always paid back what I borrowed. At the point of mums passing I had paid back £250 of a £500 loan.

when mum was able, she withdrew regularly lend/ give me money, so I know that she wouldn’t have an issue, even though I know it’s against the rules.

I do have a sibling but I am sole executor as my sibling isn’t very involved

I do feel very guilty but I’ve really struggled

It dosent matter if she regularly gave you money. Once an official POA is in place and you are the trustee you are not allowed to help yourself from tbeir account, even if you do pay it back. It is financial abuse of a vulnerable person.

ParmaVioletTea · 29/12/2025 11:58

Depending on where you are in the world, this could be seen as abuse of your power of attorney.

Was your PoA officially drawn up and notarised?

ParmaVioletTea · 29/12/2025 12:00

Bigcoat1 · 29/12/2025 09:09

I mentioned it to a friend and they thought that it would be viewed as theft, which worries me

Well, yes it is theft! It’s financial abuse.

If I were your sibling, I’d be deeply shocked, and angry.

MatchaTea1 · 29/12/2025 12:01

Bigcoat1 · 29/12/2025 08:12

I think it’s the fact that I did it without asking

How will anyone prove you and your mum didn't have a conversation about this and she agreed?

HelpMeGetThrough · 29/12/2025 12:02

Aluna · 29/12/2025 11:57

Yes. It’s specifically against the rules. However point:

4 Attorneys must keep detailed records and accounts of all transactions and be able to prove they managed the donor’s property responsibly

Means that if she documents it all clearly now and there is no loss to DM’s estate, she may not get in trouble.

Edited

Dunno, I’m a Consultant, not a Solicitor so it’s all ifs, buts and maybes to me.

HeadDeskHeadDesk · 29/12/2025 12:06

So long as you paid the money back I don't see the issue. Of course you should not have done it without asking and getting the required permission, but luckily for you your mum can't either confirm or deny that happened either way now, so if anyone asks you can just say she agreed to lend you the money. The important thing as that it can be shown that you paid it back.

BadgernTheGarden · 29/12/2025 12:06

Did you still owe money to her when she died? If you did tell the executor and pay back the money to the estate. If you didn't owe any money at the time it may not be a problem. I hope you kept really good records of where all her money was spent on things on her behalf and of the loans you took and repaid. It could take a lot of reconciling.

WutheringTights · 29/12/2025 12:07

Weekmindedfool · 29/12/2025 11:21

Yes but if a lasting POA was in effect for financial decisions with you as trustee you were ultimately making the decisions irrespective of her input. In that situation if you paid yourself a loan from her account even with her consent you were breaking the law. If she was capable of making decisions then the POA should not have been effected. You cant have it both ways.

Nonsense. PsOA are affected for all sorts of reasons, not just incapacity. Someone might prefer for someone to act on their behalf and be consulted. I’ve advised on many corporate transactions where a shareholder/director has given POA to sign documents because they’re unavailable to sign (eg in holiday) or because it’s just more convenient for one person to sign on behalf of everyone else. Stop scaring people.

Lotsandlotsandlotsoffun · 29/12/2025 12:08

Upsetbetty · 29/12/2025 08:14

Did you not post this recently already??

Yes, i gave seen this before...

EyeLevelStick · 29/12/2025 12:08

BadgernTheGarden · 29/12/2025 12:06

Did you still owe money to her when she died? If you did tell the executor and pay back the money to the estate. If you didn't owe any money at the time it may not be a problem. I hope you kept really good records of where all her money was spent on things on her behalf and of the loans you took and repaid. It could take a lot of reconciling.

OP is the executor.

PositiveCat · 29/12/2025 12:10

Bigcoat1 · 29/12/2025 11:14

Thanks for posts. I’ll try and answer all questions here….

so I’ve always paid back what I borrowed. At the point of mums passing I had paid back £250 of a £500 loan.

when mum was able, she withdrew regularly lend/ give me money, so I know that she wouldn’t have an issue, even though I know it’s against the rules.

I do have a sibling but I am sole executor as my sibling isn’t very involved

I do feel very guilty but I’ve really struggled

Firstly I don’t see how you could prove or disprove your mother’s consent which could be a verbal agreement.

Secondly you can show repayment.

i would not worry about it. When my mother passed my siblings and I had to show gifts of money made in the previous 7 years because they then formed part of her estate for inheritance tax purposes. One sibling had an outstanding amount left to repay a loan, so that was then treated as a gift and deducted from their portion of the remaining estate. I imagine the outstanding £250 you borrowed will be treated similarly.

Eyeshadow · 29/12/2025 12:11

The bank statements will show that you have paid the money back.
It will at least show you putting money in her account

I would not worry about this at all.

peacefulpeach · 29/12/2025 12:14

DeftWasp · 29/12/2025 11:30

Literally no one is going to probe - as executor you just use the totals of monies, assets etc at the time of death and bung them into the probate form and if over the threshold IHT400 -

No one back tracks through bank statements forensically - it goes off, probate gets granted and you dole out the money.

If the OP has got an accountant involved or something, that's a massive waste of money, but even they won't go back through, its what was in the pot at death that counts.

That’s not true. HMRC can and do sometimes trawl through bank statements / accounts.

’HMRC can access bank account information during the probate process if necessary to assess inheritance tax (IHT) liabilities. While they do not routinely check accounts of deceased individuals, HMRC may investigate financial records, including bank statements, if there are red flags on the IHT return, such as unexplained gifts made within the seven years prior to death, or if the estate is insolvent and a creditor raises concerns. They may scrutinize withdrawals or transfers to determine if funds were used for personal expenses or gifts, which could affect IHT.
HMRC may also request documentation to verify the source and use of funds, particularly if the deceased had significant financial activity or if there are indications of undeclared income, such as rental income. Executors are advised to maintain detailed records, including receipts for expenses paid from the estate, to support the IHT return and avoid disputes.’

nicepotoftea · 29/12/2025 12:21

peacefulpeach · 29/12/2025 12:14

That’s not true. HMRC can and do sometimes trawl through bank statements / accounts.

’HMRC can access bank account information during the probate process if necessary to assess inheritance tax (IHT) liabilities. While they do not routinely check accounts of deceased individuals, HMRC may investigate financial records, including bank statements, if there are red flags on the IHT return, such as unexplained gifts made within the seven years prior to death, or if the estate is insolvent and a creditor raises concerns. They may scrutinize withdrawals or transfers to determine if funds were used for personal expenses or gifts, which could affect IHT.
HMRC may also request documentation to verify the source and use of funds, particularly if the deceased had significant financial activity or if there are indications of undeclared income, such as rental income. Executors are advised to maintain detailed records, including receipts for expenses paid from the estate, to support the IHT return and avoid disputes.’

Because they want to ensure that somebody isn't avoiding tax, not because they are looking for theft.