Annie65 In theory, all commision payments are automatically calculated on how much product adherents have bought (by value) directly from 'FLP,' or from other 'FLP' adherents, the previous month. Whilst the adherents' percentage of commission depends (again in theory) on what level they have achieved, and maintained, in the hierarchy.
Although 'FLP' has had published 'Amway'-style smokescreen 'rules' which appear to make it obligatory for adherents to sell on a large majority of the products they have bought from 'FLP' and its adherents to 'customers', before they can qualify for commission payments, in reality, these 'rules' have not been not enforced and the vague term 'customers' can be taken to mean other adherents, rather than members of the general public.
Thus, 'MLM' commission payments systems are always presented as being based on the value of products adherents buy and then sell-on to real customers each month, but because the adherents are taught not to seel, but to buy a significant quota of the products each month and recruit others to duplicate the same system etc., ad infinitum (as a means of achieving financial freedom), in 'MLM' rackets, rewards have actually been unlawfully based on the number of further obedient contributing recruits an existing, obedient contributing recruit, can sign up and maintain.
This type of dissimulated pyramid scheme based on perpetual payment and perpetual recruitment, is forbidden by (ill-written) UK trading schemes laws, but it's also forbidden by criminal laws which clearly define, and prohibit, fraud.
Since 'MLM' products have not being generally sold to members of the general public outside of a closed-market (based on value and demand), from all rational economic points of view, the 'MLM' products might as well not exist. 'MLM' rackets have all been variations of essentially the same absurd illusion based on blinding casual observers with thought-stopping jargon and mathematics, whilst maintaining an absolute monopoly of information. Thus, and all accurate data about what has really been occuring behind the impenetrable 'MLM' facade, has been withheld from the public and from the regulators.
Presumeably, even though 'FLP' commission payments are worked out an executed by computers, the computers must be operated by junior 'FLP' staff, and the payments authorised by senior staff.
I don't know if you were following earlier threads, but a MN member briefly appeared and explained that her husband had been sub-contracted to do IT work at 'FLP' HQ in the UK. Even though no names were given, the disclosing of this banal information was probably in breach of her husband's employment contract with 'FLP.'