Welcome becca and strubi. Sorry you find yourselves here. I hope you find some support here from these lovely ladies.
sasha, so sorry to see you back here and that you are in the awful limbo. We all know what that's like and it's just the pits. Hope time goes quickly until the next scan.
I'm just on my way back from Coventry and feeling very positive indeed. Prof brosens was lovely and v funny too. Things in addition to what others have reported are as follows.
He confirmed my suspicion that he thinks the reason I didn't get pg first month of trying (I usually do) and also potentially the reason for the very early loss last time is likely to have been because i was on progesterone from 7dpo and this has made my (usually overly receptive) uterus more selective and made it reject sub standard eggs. Whilst it makes me sad that something I did potentially made me mc, to my mind this was absolutely the right thing to do as it avoided an inevitable later loss.
I had misunderstood the immune response thing. I thought it was that an increased immune response was causing rejection of the foetus, but I think from what prof brosens says that it is actually like this. In a normal pg with a properly prepared lining, cells around the developing foetus block the signal that says there is an invader from being sent to the brain, so that the foetus can develop workout being attacked. In a lining that is not properly prepared, this signal is not properly blocked,so the normal immune response that you would get to a foreign body occurs and mc results. So it's not an overactive immune response but more a lack of immune suppression. I hope I've got that right!
I asked him about the response trial and he was completely supportive of me joining if I don't get high nk results. He says it's the most exciting research in years but wishes they were giving it from before bfp as he thinks it would be more effective.
My lining looked fine (they didn't tell me the thickness but said it was ok), they said there wasn't much blood in the biopsy sample which they seemed to suggest was good?!? Bit ouchy but fine now. Feeling positive that I've got either Coventry protocol or response trial for next time.
cloud, I certainly wouldn't say you've no reason/excuse to go. Their research is all about people implanting unsuitable eggs,which would fit your circumstance too and the scratch may help conception for several months. I'm not saying you should go,of course that's up to you, but the impression I got was that chromosomally abnormal foetuses might be expected in the group that they are researching/treating. Food for thought anyway.
Sorry for the epic post everyone. Just wanted to get it down in words!