@stairway
Mydogisthebest what is your solution to people having children in this country then, bearing in mind that in this country the fertility rate is well below replacement levels? Do you want other countries to provide trained young people for the UK and be the ones to pay for all the costs involved with raising children l? Why not look at your own environmental impact rather then focus on women’s reproductive choices in this country.
I know we have an ageing population BUT, as I and a couple of other posters have already said, we cannot keep increasing the population in order to care for the elderly. That is just plainly ridiculous. The UK is already overcrowded - we can't keep adding to it.
We need less people so, no, I don't want other countries to provide young people.
Why do I need to look at my own environmental impact? Did you even read my previous post? Me and DH have NO children due to our concerns about over population and climate change. We have been vegetarian for over 30 years, recycle, buy second hand, rarely fly etc etc.
Having children is one of the worst things with regard to environmental impact but so many people are too selfish and/or stupid to accept that.
Comments like "you can have as many children as you like as long as you look after them without any help from the state" are pathetic and untrue. No one should be having lots of children.
Plus, as I said, how many women have a child without any money/help from the state? They conveniently don't think about how much a birth costs the NHS, how much 1 child's education costs the state