Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

News

Expecting 14th child but will have more babies till twins or triplets??? I must be insane

203 replies

Divatheshopaholic · 23/11/2009 10:07

I dont know if anyone started thread already. I just spotted this on DM
39 year old with 13children expecting 14th and there will be more coming.
I love big family, but after having two, we decided two is just enough but this seems abnormal, having twins or triplets is kind of her destiny

Disguss! What do you think? Would you have as many as her? I

OP posts:
EvilTwins · 23/11/2009 10:12

What pisses me off about this is the way that people insist on treating twins/multiples as some kind of novelty act or freak show. I have twins. Yes, it's wonderful, but the number of people who told me when I was pregnant "ooo, I always wanted twins" was laughable. WHY? Why does she want twins so much? Twins are great, but essentially they are two separate children, and it's utterly unfair to treat them as anything but. I bet she'd be the type to dress twins identically and call them matching names.
OK, rant over.

I also think she's bonkers. Two is plenty for me, thank you.

Tambajam · 23/11/2009 10:13

Have
you
seen
her
name
choices?

I would perhaps suggest that having twins or triplets is infact NOT her destiny as destiny is trying very hard to point out to her.

nancy75 · 23/11/2009 10:17

i am more shocked by their names than anything else!

LoveBeingAMummy · 23/11/2009 10:18
Biscuit
NorbertDentressangle · 23/11/2009 10:21

FFs -the names!!

What hope has a child called Rogue...or Blackbird...or Peppermint

girlsyearapart · 23/11/2009 10:21

patrick and stephen must be counting their lucky stars!!

thedollshouse · 23/11/2009 10:22

So she starts us with normal names - Stephen, Patrick, then it all goes a bit wrong.

I think she must have a screw loose. I'm not going to stop until I have twins - she sounds like a spoilt child.

LadyOfTheFlowers · 23/11/2009 10:28
Biscuit
FabHasHadHerSurprise · 23/11/2009 10:31

What annoys me is they get £800 a week in tax credits.

Honeypeckle · 23/11/2009 10:38

I think naming your kids after a character in a horror movie is so wrong!

MaMight · 23/11/2009 10:38

Oh my goodness. What unusual names.

MatthewBellamysMuse · 23/11/2009 10:48

£50,000 a year in benefits!
No-one should have such a large family if they can't afford to pay for them themselves.
And spending £5,000 at Toys R Us on Christmas presents is ridiculous - that's £416 on each child still living at home. We don't spend anywhere near that amount and we're not living on benefits.

Meglet · 23/11/2009 10:53

She's not well is she. Not a bad person, just major issues.

I think peppermint is a cute name, although clearly bonkers.

Divatheshopaholic · 23/11/2009 10:54

yes, she started with normal names and then all gone wrong, names from horror film is not nice is it?
btw, my grandmother never had benefits or wahtsoever
think about people who wants their own child and ttc for years, and many failed ivfs. and here she is wants twins and triplets to ahppen

OP posts:
CommonNortherner · 23/11/2009 11:18

VOORHEES??????

Poohbearsmom · 23/11/2009 11:21

Nothing wrong wit big families, my dh is youngest of 9, sadly 3of his siblings died but big families were normal long ago, there were two brothers living next door to each other in my parents village (rural irl yrs ago) one had 21 children & the other had 19!! But this woman wit her 'destiny' is, as many hav said, 'clearly bonkers'!!

MoreCrackThanHarlem · 23/11/2009 11:24

14 children is too many imo.
Particularly when you are financially unable to support them.

MoreCrackThanHarlem · 23/11/2009 11:28

And Poohbear, big families were normal because of a lack of contraceptive advice and fewer available choices for women.
Lots of situations were more widespread, such as the acceptance of domestic violence and fewer educational choices for girls.
A current situation cannot be justified through the example of the past.

Poohbearsmom · 23/11/2009 11:55

Yes i agree they did not hav the options, education and freedom available to them as we do, we are very lucky... But there are still many ppl in western/developed/modern societies who have large families not through lack of education or contraception choices but by choice... If they are able to take care of them all well, then thats their decision. Although this women is living entirely off benefits Isnt she??

SoupDragon · 23/11/2009 11:58

She is clearly bonkers.

MoreCrackThanHarlem · 23/11/2009 12:03

Her husband is working.

Imvho whilst some parents of 14+ children may well 'take care' of their children, it is impossible for them to offer each child the same level of attention and opportunity they could have, should they have decided to stick to 3.

wannaBe · 23/11/2009 12:07

the woman is mad.

But personally I think there should be a limit on the amount of benefits, incl child benefits, are paid per family.

This family will be claiming hundreds of £s a month in child benefit alone. Is it right that the taxpayer should subsidise this? I think not.

ButtercupWafflehead · 23/11/2009 12:10

Could she not spend some of her £4k Christmas budget on rent in a slightly larger house?

3 bedrooms????

wastingaway · 23/11/2009 12:11

The husband works. They are as entitled to their tax credits as I am to mine, with one DC.
Her children will be paying our pensions.
And although yes, she is clearly bonkers, and the names , I can't see that she's actually hurting anyone.

WhatDidISayRoy · 23/11/2009 12:15

she is barking. end of.