Okay, so under your proposal
If you are an owner, but at leaseholder, what happens?
Also, I am currently in a shared freehold flat. It doesn't make any sense that the land all the flats are built on get valued and the price set accordingly. It would then be a nightmare because we'd have to find a way to pay on behalf of all the freeholders and why should we all pay the same? Just because of the value of the land the block is built on? So you're proposing that from my small one bed I pay the same amount as someone in a three bed.
At the moment we all have an individual bill for council tax and it is calculated on the basis of the size of our flat. Which makes a lot of sense.
I also would be in favour of a per person charge. People keep pointing to the poll tax riots. However, that was so many years ago - I mean I was a child - politically speaking it's a lifetime ago
I think people have moved round to the idea that you maybe pay per person if you're paying for council services.
i'm also quite suspicious of the land tax thing because it would create a huge amount more gravy train jobs and a pretty much constant source of them given the fluctuation in land values.
I'm aware of people who are still in the same council tax band in in spite of having extended their houses, mum knows a couple of these. But surely that's on councils being crap for not doing an assessment.
Couple of people in my building had to go to tribunal with the council - as a new build you can't relate to prices from 1994 or whatever it is and there were a couple of flats that were priced really oddly. They got changed though.
I suppose no one wants to go to the council and say "why am I paying the same as number nine when number nine has had a full extension to the side and the back".